From Motives to Actions: A Study of Citizen Engagement in Health and Human Service Contracts

References

• Adams, B. (2004). Public meetings and the democratic process. Public Administration Review, 64, 43–54. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00345.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirkhanyan, A. A., & Lambright, K. (2017). Citizen participation in the age of contracting: When service delivery trumps democracy. New York, NY: Routledge Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65, 547–558. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67, 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryer, T. A. (2010). Living democracy in theory and practice: Getting dirty in a local government incorporation process. Public Administration and Management, 15, 259–304.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes: Theory to practice. Public Administration Review, 73, 23–34. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 33–49. doi:10.1080/01944360308976292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, K. (2007). Elements of effective governance: Measurement, accountability and participation. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. (2010). Is constituent feedback living up to its promise? Provider perceptions of feedback in nonprofit human service organizations. Families in Society, 91, 313–320. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. L. (2005). Civic engagement in the twenty-first century: Toward a scholarly and practical agenda. Public Administration Review, 65, 534–535. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66, 76–88. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00668.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creighton, J. L. (2005). The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, D. A., & Stevens, J. R. (2012). Citizen engagement in local environmental policy. In H. L. Schachter & K. Yang (Eds.), The state of citizen participation in America (pp. 131–162). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (1973). Citizen participation in a bureaucratic society: Some questions and skeptical notes. In H. G. Frederickson (Ed.), Neighborhood control in the 1970s (pp. 59–72). New York, NY: Chandler Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The new public service: Steering, not serving. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, L. A. (2007–2008). Public participation/private contract. Social Justice, 34(3–4), 148–172.
   Google Scholar
• Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. L. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66, 437–447. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75, 513–522. doi:10.1111/puar.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., & Holzer, M. (2010). Citizen participation and performance measurement: Operationalizing democracy through better accountability. Public Administration Quarterly, 34, 378–399. doi:10.2307/41288353
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, K. E. (2003). Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administration Review, 63, 535–543. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homsy, G. C., & Hart, S. (2019). Sustainability backfire: The unintended consequences of failing to engage neighborhood residents in policymaking. Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1080/07352166.2019.1607746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64, 55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopetzky, A. (2012). The Benson-Ames Alliance: An exercise in urban planning. In H. L. Schachter & K. Yang (Eds.), The state of citizen participation in America (pp. pp. 283–308). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K. (2009). Paternalistic or participatory governance? Examining opportunities for client participation in nonprofit social service organizations. Public Administration Review, 69, 504–517. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01996.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikesell, J. L. (2014). Fiscal administration. Boston, MA: Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, DC. The American Review of Public Administration, 33, 164–188. doi:10.1177/0275074003251379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40, 376–399. doi:10.1177/0275074009356467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72, 699–708. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02544.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31, 272–290. doi:10.1177/0739456X11410979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 34, 315–353. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30, 251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, H. L. (2012). Introduction: American civic participation in the 21st century. In H. L. Schachter & K. Yang (Eds.), The state of citizen participation in America (pp. 3–20). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T., Nabatchi, T., & Brand, D. (2016). Introduction: Special issue on the coproduction of public services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 3–7. doi:10.1177/0020852315618187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2001). Assessing public participation in U.S. cities. Public Performance & Management Review, 24, 322–336. doi:10.2307/3381222
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2005). Assessing citizen involvement efforts by local governments. Public Performance and Management Review, 29, 191–216.
   Google Scholar