Accountability and Public Interest in Government Institutions

References

• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411–423.
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P., & Heintzanan, R. (2000). The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform. International Review of Administration. doi:10.1177/0020852300661005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awal, M. H. M. (2010). Does the Judiciary matter for accountability of administration in Bangladesh? International Journal of Law and Management, 52(4), 309–331. doi:10.1108/17542431011059331
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1999). Assembling constituent validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. doi:10.2307/2393203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R. (2011). Congressional and presidential effects on the demand for lobbying. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 3–16. doi:10.1177/1065912909343578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, P. (1996). Stewardship: Choosing science over self-interest. San Francisco, CA: Berrett – Koehler Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Value for money and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Sarewitz, D. (2005). Public failure in science policy. Science and Public Policy, 32(2), 119–136. doi:10.3152/147154305781779588
   Google Scholar
• Chaffe, P. (1997). Accountable leadership: A resource guide for sustaining legal, financial and ethical integrity in today’s congregations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399–403. doi:10.3844/jssp.2010.399.403
   Google Scholar
• Conners, R., Smith, T., & Hickman, C. (1994). The Oz Principle: Getting results through individual and organizational accountability. Paramus NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Expanded Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49–65. doi:10.1177/031289629101600103
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L, & Davis, J. H. (1993). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1962). An economic theory of democracy. New York Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dutzik, T., Imus, B., & Baxandall, P. (2009). Privatization and the public interest: The need for transparency and accountability in Chicago’s public asset lease deals (Report, Illinois PIRG Action Fund). Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, J. D. (2001). How block scheduling reform effects classroom practice. The High School Journal. JSTOR. (4), 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. O. (2003). Liberal education and the public interest. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgiov, A. D. (2002). The effect of Accountability on pastoral stress and burnout among select Hungarian Baptist pastors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. (UMI to No. 3046675).
   Google Scholar
• Halqachmi, A. (2012). Charter schools in the USA: A strategy to increase responsiveness, service quality and stretch resources. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62 (4), 420–435.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, L., & Longva, F. (2014). Contracting accountability in network governance structures. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11(2), 92–110. doi: 10.1108/qra
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J. L. (2007). Accountability and Assessment: Is public interest in K – 12 Education being served?
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, M. (2007). Promoting stewardship behavior in organizations: A leadership model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 121.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, M. (2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37 (2), 172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (2009). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, structural equation modeling. A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Igbo, J. N., Onu, V. C., & Obiyo, N. O. (2015). Impact of gender stereotype on secondary school students’ self-concept and academic achievement. SAGE Open, 5(1), 215824401557393. doi: 10.1177/2158244015573934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbra, J.G., & Dwivedi, O.P. (1988). Public service accountability: A comparative perspective. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., Wood, & Bruce, E. W. (2007). Development of three scales to measure leader accountability. Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA: Regent University, School of Global Leadership and Entrepreneurship.
   Google Scholar
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1993). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people demand IT. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z.(2002). The Leadership Challenge(3rd ed.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.m-04-2014–0032
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S., & Klein, K. (2000). A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), A multi-level approach to theory and research methods in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kraines, G. A. (2001). Accountability leadership: How to strengthen productivity through sound managerial leadership. Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krejicie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610. doi:10.1177/001316447003000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, L., Bolman, C., & Van Dijke, M. (2006). Factors related to misperception of physical activity in The Netherlands and implications for health promotion programmes. Health Promotion International, 21(2), 104–112. doi:10.1093/heapro/dal011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leif, L. (1991). Self-interest and public interest in western politics. comparative european politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255–275. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. W. (2006). In Pursuit of the Public Interest. Public Administration Review, 66(5). doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York:Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Mandeville, B. (1732), The fable of the bees. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924. Critical edition in two volumes.
   Google Scholar
• Manwaring, P. A. (1997). Building trust in educational leadership, and a new instrument to measure subordinates’ trust: A study conducted in the church educational system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Brigham Young University, Provo, UT. (UMI to No. 9717112).
   Google Scholar
• Mark, P. (2012), Accountability representation and Legitimacy: Corporation and the World Bank. Politics and International Relations. University of Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Markman, K. D., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). I couldn’t have known’: Accountability, foreseeability and counterfactual denials of responsibility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 313–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mbago, M., Ntayi, M. J., & Muhwezi, M. (2016). Compliances : Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Public Procurements, 16, 374–405. doi:10.1108/JOPP-16-03-2016-B006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MDG. (2015). Final Millennium Development Goals Report for Uganda 2015: Results, Reflections and the Way Forward.
   Google Scholar
• (1993). Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (10th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam – Webster.
   Google Scholar
• MoE. (2016). Ministry of Education and Sports Report, Background to the Budget 2015-2016 Fiscal year. Kampala, Uganda.
   Google Scholar
• MoH. (2016). Ministry of Health Ministerial Statement on Ugandan Health Performance 2015-2016.
   Google Scholar
• MoH. (2017). Ministry of Health Report to the Parliament of the Republic of Uganda 2015-2016.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, P. M. (1989). The Man in the Mirror. Brentwood, TN: Wolgemuth & Hyatt.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, D. E., & Svennevig, M. (2002). The Public Interest, the Media and Pvway Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Moyers, B. (2007). For America’s sake, The Nation.
   Google Scholar
• Ntayi. (2012). Emotional outcomes of Uganda SME buyer-supplier contractual conflicts. Faculty of computing and management science. Kampala, Uganda: MUBS.
   Google Scholar
• Nunally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: MCGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Okoh, L., & Ohwoyibo, O. (2009). Public accountability: vehicle for socio-economic development of Nigeria. International Journal of Investment and Finance, 3(1 & 2), 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), (2014). Recommendation of the Council on OECD Guidelines for managing conflict of interest in public service.
   Google Scholar
• Petrick, J. A., & Quinn, J. F. (2001). The challenge of leadership accountability for integrity capacity as a strategic asset. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 331–344. doi:10.1023/A:1012597201948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 13(2), 531–544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., Brendan, J. C., & Lowery, D. (2014). Representatives of the public? Public opinion and interest group activity. European Journal of Political Research. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (1988). Introduction in the power of Public ideas. Cambridge, MA: Bllinger.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. S. (2012). The consequential list scale: Elucidating the Rule of Deontological and Utilitarian Beliefs in Moral Judgments’ Master of Arts, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B., & Dubnick, M. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47 (3), 223.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, Z. (2016). Personal accountability in Education. Measure development and validation. 55(1), 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, E. V. (2015). Holding employees accountable for the accomplishment of organizational goals: The case of the U.S. federal government. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 18(1), 75–104.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M. N. (2011). Research methods for business students (5/e). India: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schattscheider, E. E. (1960). The Seniovereign people. A realistic view of democracy in America. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. (2013). Beyond individualism/collectivism. New cultural dimensions of values. Individualism and collectivism. theory, method and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Sekarana, U. (2000). Research methods for business: A skill-building (4th edn.) approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Siege-Jacobs, K., & Yates, J. F. (1996). Effects of procedural and outcomes accountability on judgment quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 1, 1–17. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2005). Opinion Policy dynamics: Public preferences and public expenditure in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 665–689. doi:10.1017/S0007123405000347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, E. P. (1999). Theory-driven reasoning about plausible pasts and probable futures in world politics: Are we prisoners of our preconceptions? American Journal of Political Science. 43(2), 335–336.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., & Brendan, O. (2005). Theorizing accountability for NGO advocacy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(3), 379–376.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2014). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation Annual Report on Education 2013–2014.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (2015). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation Annual Report on Education 2014-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Van Puyvelde, D. (2013). Intelligence accountability and the role of public interest groups in the United States. Intelligence and National Security, 28, 139–158. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.735078
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, M. (2006). Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to understand the government – Non-profit social service contracting relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 157–187. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2015). World Health Organisation Annual Report on health 2014-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. A. (2006), Development of three scales to measure leader accountability (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Regent University School of Leadership Studies, Virginia Beach, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. A., & Winston, B. E. (2005). Toward a new understanding of leadership accountability: Defining a critical construct. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11, 84–94. doi:10.1177/107179190501100307
   Google Scholar
• World Bank.(2017a). Development Report 2016/2017. NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2017b). World development indicators. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar