Designing Administrative Reforms for Maintaining Trust

References

• Alm Andreassen, T. (2012). Betingelser og beskrankninger for effektivisering. Belyst gjennom organisering av spesialiserte enheter for saksbehandling [Conditions for and hindrances to effectiveness]. Nordiske organisasjonsstudier, 14(3), 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Alm Andreassen, T., & Fossestøl, K. (2009). Å utvikle en helhetlig og brukerrettet forvaltning – Oppdragsstyring eller samstyring? [Developing a holistic and user centered employment and welfare service]. Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning, 12(3), 168–179.
   Google Scholar
• Alm Andreassen, T., & Fossestøl, K. (2011). NAV ved et veiskille. Organisasjonsendring som velferdsreform [NAV at the crossroads: Organizational change as welfare reform]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Alm Andreassen, T., & Fossestøl, K. (2014). ‘Utfordrende inkluderingspolitikk: Samstyring for omforming av institusjonell logikk i arbeidslivet, helsetjenesten og NAV [Governance for transformation of institutional logic in work life, health services and NAV]’. Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning, 55(2), 174–202.
   Google Scholar
• Alm Andreassen, T., Fossestøl, K., & Klemsdal, L. (2011). Gjør organisering en forskjell i praksis? Variasjoner i de lokale NAV‐kontorenes organisering og konsekvenser for reformens måloppnåelse [Variations in the organization of the local NAV offices]. Nordiske organisasjonsstudier, 13(3), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasson, U. (2017). Trust—The Nordic gold. Copenhagen. doi: 10.6027/ANP2017-737
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstrøm, V. H., & Svare, H. (2017). Significance of monitoring and control for employees’ felt trust, motivation, and mastery. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 7(4). doi:10.18291/njwls.v7i4.102356
   Google Scholar
• Bianco, W. T. (1994). Trust: Representatives and constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumberg, P. (1989). The predatory society: Deception in the American marketplace. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. doi:10.2307/2088165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breit, E. (2014). Discursive practices of remedial organizational identity work: A study of the Norwegian labor and welfare administration. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(2), 231–241. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. G. (1994). Restoring the public trust. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Caiden, G. E. (1999). Administrative reform—Proceed with caution. International Journal of Public Administration, 22(6), 815–832. doi:10.1080/01900699908525406
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Fimreite, A. L., & Lægreid, P. (2014). Joined-up government for welfare administration reform in Norway. Public Organization Review, 14(4), 439–456. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0237-8
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2013). Welfare administration reform between coordination and specialization. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(8), 556–566. doi:10.1080/01900692.2013.772628
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lise Fimreite, A., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Reform of the employment and welfare administrations— He challenges of co-coordinating diverse public organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 389–408. doi:10.1177/0020852307081149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. C., & Payne, R. L. (1997). The nature and structure of workers’ trust in management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(3), 205–224. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199705)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, J., & Wang, K. Y. (2009). Feeling trusted and loyalty: Modeling supervisor-subordinate interaction from a trustee perspective. The International Employment Relations Review, 15(1), 16–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• duGay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber, organization, ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, A., & Kosfeld, M. (2006). The hidden costs of control. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1611–1630. doi:10.1257/aer.96.5.1611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldheim, M. A. (2007). Public sector downsizing and employee trust. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(3), 249–270. doi:10.1080/01900690601117739
   Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., Andreassen, T. A., & Klemsdal, L. (2015). Managing institutional complexity in public sector reform: Hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 290–306. doi:10.1111/padm.12144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of ‘leadership’. Human Relations, 58(11), 1467–1494. doi:10.1177/0018726705061314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, P. G. (1974). Socio-technical design: Strategies in multidisciplinary research. London, UK: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Economics and Finance 4(59), 285–300.
   Google Scholar
• Klemsdal, L. (2009). Utviklingsprosessen på de lokale Nav-kontorene: Veien fra reform til ny praksis. Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning, 12(3), 180–191.
   Google Scholar
• Klemsdal, L. (2011). Navet i reformprosessen: Den lokale NAV-lederen som utviklingsleder. In T. A. Andreassen & K. Fossestøl (Eds.), NAV ved et veiskille. Organisasjonsendring som velferdsreform (pp. 236–252). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Klemsdal, L. (2013). From bureaucracy to learning organization: Critical minimum specification design as space for sensemaking. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(1), 39–52. doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9267-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemsdal, L., Ravn, J. E., Amble, N., & Finne, H. (2017). The organization theories of the industrial democracy experiments meet contemporary organizational realities. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 7(S2), 1–15. doi:10.18291/njwls.v7iS2.96687
   Google Scholar
• Knack, S., & Zak, P. J. (2003). Building trust: Public policy, interpersonal trust, and economic development. Supreme Court Economic Review, 10, 91–107. doi:10.1086/scer.10.1147139
   Google Scholar
• Lau, D. C., Lam, L. W., & Wen, S. S. (2014). Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self‐evaluative perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 112–127. doi:10.1002/job.1861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985. doi:10.2307/2578601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1988). Familarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alterantives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). New York, NY: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J. (1992). Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D., & Zeffane, R. (2003). Employee involvement, organizational change and trust in management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 55–75. doi:10.1080/09585190210158510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organizations. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (pp. 295–336). Greenwitch, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1996). Trust-based forms of governance. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 51–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government. Chigago: The University of Chigago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organizational Science, 4(3), 367–392. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, O. H., Hasle, P., & Pejtersen, J. H. (2011). Trust relations in management of change. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(4), 405–417. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørhaug, T. (2004). Managementalitet og autoritetens forvandling : Ledelse i en kunnskapsøkonomi. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforl.
   Google Scholar
• St.prp. ( 46 2004-2005). Ny arbeids og velferdsforvaltning. Oslo: The Norwegian Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Dawes, R. (1993). Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In B. Mellers & J. N. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications (pp. 87–108). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960283-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin, A. F. (1992). Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust. Applied Ergonomics, 23(1), 35–42. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(92)90008-
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 453–502. doi:10.1086/467284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar