Perceived Barriers to Decision Quality in Three Swedish Public Authorities

References

• ÄFL. (1971:290). Äldre Förvaltningslag [Former administrative procedure act], 3§. Government Offices of Sweden, Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, C. M., & Hedelin, L. (2005). Adjusting new initiatives to the social environment: Organizational decision making as learning, commitment creating and behavior regulation. In H. Montgomery, R. Lipshitz & B. Brehmer (Eds.), How professionals make decisions, (pp. 223–232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, C.M, & Salo, I. (2014). Conceptions of decision quality and effectiveness in decision processes according to administrative officers and investigators making decisions for others in three swedish public authorities. Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership & Governance, 38(3), 271-282. doi: 10.1080/23303131.2014.893277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthon, P., Pitt, L. F., & Ewing, M. T. (2001). Corollaries of the collective: The influence of organizational culture and memory development on perceived decision-making context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/jcr.1998.25.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710726136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2010). Things to do today: A daily diary study on task completion at work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59(2), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.2010.59.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, D. A. (1991). The effect of decision-making styles and contextual experience on executives’ descriptions of organizational problem formulation. Journal of Management Studies, 28(5), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.1991.28.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiori, S. (2008). Herbert A. Simon and contemporary theories of bounded rationality. Dipartimento di Economia “S. Cognetti de Martiis”, Centro di Studi sulla Storia e i Metodi dell’Economia Politica, “Claudio Napoleoni”, Università di Torino. Department of Economics. Research Paper No. 2/2008-CESMEP. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1367091
   Google Scholar
• FL. (1986:223). Förvaltningslagen (The 1986 Administrative Procedure Act (including subsequent amendments)). Government Offices of Sweden, Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ganster, D. C., & Schaubroeck, J. (1991). Work stress and employee health. Journal of Management, 17(2), 235–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellners, T., & Malmqvist, B. (2007). Förvaltningslagen: Med kommentarer [Administrative procedure act: With comments] (2nd ed.). Norstedts Juridik AB.
   Google Scholar
• Justitieombudsmannen -JO. (2016). Justitieombudsmännens Ämbetsberättelse, 2016/17:JO1 (The swedish parliamentary ombudsmen, Annual report 2016/2017). Riksdagens ombudsmän (JO). Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://www.jo.se/Global/Ämbetsberättelser/JOsämbetsberättelse2016-17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administration Science Quarterly, 24 (2), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, D. J., & Schwartz, B. (2007). “Leaky” rationality: How research on behavioral decision making challenges normative standards of rationality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2 (2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00035.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koolhaas, J. M., Bartolomucci, A., Buwalda, B., de Boer, S. F., Flügge, G., Korte, S. M., Meerlo, P., Murison, R., Olivier, B., Palanza, P., Richter-Levin, G., Sgoifo, A., Steimer, T., Stiedl, O., van Dijk, G., Wöhr, M., & Fuchs, E. (2011). Stress revisited: A critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35 (5), 1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, P., & Pool, J. (1991). Organizational decision making: Models, contingencies, and strategies. In J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer, & J. Leplat (Eds.), Distributed decision making: Cognitive models for cooperative work (pp. 19–46). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Korunka, C., Scharitzer, D., Carayon, P., & Sainfort, F. (2003). Employee strain and job satisfaction related to an implementation of quality in a public service organization: A longitudinal study. Work & Stress, 17(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267837031000109526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (2001). The creative destruction of decision research. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1086/323738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1997). Understanding how decisions happen in organizations. In Z. Shapira Ed., Organizational decision making. Cambridge series on judgement and decision making (pp. 9–32). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). How can decision making be improved? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4 (4), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (2), 246–275. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2014). Scarcity The true cost of not having enough. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Narbón-Perpiñá, I., & De Witte, K. (2018). Local governments’ efficiency: A systematic literature review-part I. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2), 431–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C. (1984). Types of organizational decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (3), 414–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke, M. R., Weinhardt, J. M., Brodsky, A., Tangirala, S., & DeVoe, S. E. (2018). When daily planning improves employee performance: The importance of planning type, engagement, and interruptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perski, A., Grossi, G., Evengård, B., Blomkvist, V., Yilbar, B., & Ort-Gomér, K. (2002). Emotionell utmattning vanlig bland kvinnor i offentlig sektor [Emotional exhaustion common among women in the public sector]. Läkartidningen, 99(18), 2047–2052. http://lakartidningen.se/OldPdfFiles/2002/24739.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Salo, I, & Allwood, C.M. (2014). Decision-making context and stress: administrative officers and investigators in three swedish public authorities. Journal Of Workplace Behavioral Health, 29(2), 175–193. doi: 10.1080/15555240.2014.897918
   Google Scholar
• Shafir, E. (2007). Decisions constructed locally: Some fundamental principles of the psychology of decision making. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 334–352). The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 491–517. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1816653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorstensson, C. A., Mathiasson, J., Arvidsson, B., Heide, A., & Petersson, I. F. (2008). Cooperation between gatekeepers in sickness insurance—the perspective of social insurance officers. A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 8, 231. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., Vachon, F., Lanfond, D., & Kramer, C. (2012). Dealing with task interruptions in complex dynamic environments: Are two heads better than one? Human Factors, 54(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811424896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. L. G., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2010). Cognitive activation theory of stress (CATS). Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(6), 877–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Luitgaarden, G. M. J. (2009). Evidence-based practice in social work: Lessons from judgment and decision making theory. British Journal of Social Work, 39(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar