References
- Altfeld, M. F., & Miller, G. J. (1984). Sources of bureaucratic influence: Expertise and agenda control. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28(4), 701–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002784028004006
- Andrews, C. W. (2013). Policy analysis styles in Brazil. In J. Vaitsman, L. Lobato, J. M. Ribeiro (Eds.), Policy analysis in Brazil (1st ed., pp. 27–38). Policy Press at University of Bristol.
- Ariely, G. (2013). Public administration and citizen satisfaction with democracy: Cross national evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 747–766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313501432
- Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800106
- Brinkerhoff, D. W. (1985). Managerial roles for social development management. Public Administration and Development, 5(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230050205
- Camões, P. J., & Mendes, S. M. (2019). Do citizens trust the civil service differently? Comparing the determinants of confidence in political-administrative institutions. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(14), 1234–1244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1592187
- Capano, G. (2009). Understanding policy change as an epistemological and theoretical problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802648284
- Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928 (Vol. 78). Princeton University Press.
- Cavalcante, P., & Carvalho, P. (2017). Profissionalização da Burocracia Federal Brasileira (1995-2014): Avanços e dilemas. Revista De Administração Pública, 51(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612144002
- Cavalcante, P. O., & Lotta, G. (Org.). (2015). Burocracia de Médio Escalão: perfil, trajetória e atuação (1. ed., Vol. 1, p. 308). Escola Nacional de Administração Pública - Enap.
- Cloutier, C., Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Lamothe, L. (2015). Agency at the managerial interface: Public sector reform as institutional work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv009
- Colebatch, H. K., & Radin, B. A. (2006). Mapping the work of policy. In H. K. Colebatch (Ed.), The work of policy: An international survey (pp. 217). Lexington Books.
- Cortázar Velarde, J. C., Fuenzalida, J., & Lafuente, M. (2016), Merit-based selection of public managers: Better public sector performance?: An exploratory study. Inter-American Development Bank.
- Durant, R. F. (1991). Whither bureaucratic influence?: A cautionary note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037103
- Feldman, M. S., & Khademian, A. M. (2007). The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance, 20(2), 305–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00358.x
- Freire, A. O. G., Viana, R. R., & Palotti, P. (2015). Influência sobre o processo decisório: O que explica o protagonismo da burocracia federal de médio escalão? In P. Cavalcante & G. Lotta (Eds.), Burocracia de médio escalão: Perfil, trajetória e atuação (pp. 91–114). ENAP.
- Fuenzalida, J., & Riccucci, N. M. (2018). The effects of politicization on performance: The mediating role of HRM practices (IDB Technical Note 1054, pp. 1–34). https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Merit-based-Selection-of-Public-Managers-Better-Public-Sector-Performance-An-Exploratory-Study.pdf
- Gilad, S., & Alon‐Barkat, S. (2018). Enhancing democracy via bureaucracy: Senior managers’ social identities and motivation for policy change. Governance, 31(2), 359–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12300
- Graef, A. (2010). Origens e fundamentos da carreira de gestor governamental. Revista De Políticas Públicas E Gestão Governamental, 9(1), 7–24. https://repositorio.enap.gov.br/bitstream/1/1724/2/Origens_e_fundamentos_da_carreira_de_gestor_gov_graef.pdf
- Hales, C. (1999). Why do managers do what they do? Reconciling evidence and theory in accounts of managerial work. British Journal of Management, 10(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00143
- Harris, J. P. (1964). Congressional control of administration. The Brookings Institution.
- Heifetz, R., & Riley, S. (1990). Political leadership: Managing the public’s problem solving. In R. Reich (Ed.), The power of public ideas (pp. 179–204). Harvard University Press.
- Hicklin, A., & Godwin, E. (2009). Agents of change: The role of public managers in public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00292.x
- Howlett, M. (2011). Public managers as the missing variable in policy studies: An empirical investigation using Canadian data. Review of Policy Research, 28(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00494.x
- Howlett, M., & Lindquist, E. (2004). Policy analysis and governance: Analytical and policy styles in Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 6(3), 225–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1387698042000305194
- Howlett, M., & Walker, R. M. (2012). Public managers in the policy process: More evidence on the missing variable? Policy Studies Journal, 40(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00450.x
- Jeffares, S., & Skelcher, C. (2011). Democratic subjectivities in network governance: AQ methodology study of english and dutch public managers. Public Administration, 89(4), 1253–1273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01888.x
- Johnson, B., & Dobni, D. (2016). Is managerial work in the public and private sectors really “different”? A comparative study of managerial work activities. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(6), 459–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1021423
- Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little Brown.
- Knill, C., Bayerlein, L., Enkler, J., & Grohs, S. (2019). Bureaucratic influence and administrative styles in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 14(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9303-x
- Korica, M., Nicolini, D., & Johnson, B. (2017). In search of ‘managerial work’: Past, present and future of an analytical category. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12090
- Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 215). Sage Publications.
- Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge university press.
- Lopez, F., & Praça, S. (2015). Critérios e lógicas de nomeação para o alto escalão da burocracia federal brasileira. In F. Lopez (Ed.), Cargos de confiança no presidencialismo de coalizão brasileiro (pp. 107–138). IPEA.
- Lopez, F., Bugarin, M., & Bugarin, K. (2015). Mudanças político-partidárias e rotatividade dos cargos de confiança (1999-2013). In F. Lopez (Ed.), Cargos de confiança no presidencialismo de coalizão brasileiro (pp. 33–70). IPEA.
- Lotta, G. S., Pires, R., & Oliveira, V. E. (2015). Burocratas de médio escalão: Novos olhares sobre velhos atores da produção de políticas públicas. In P. Cavalcante & G. Lotta (Eds.), Burocracia de médio e scalão: Perfil, trajetória e atuação. (pp. 23–56). ENAP.
- Meier, K. J. (2009). Policy theory, policy theory everywhere: Ravings of a deranged policy scholar. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00291.x
- Meltsner, A. J. (1976). Policy analysts in the bureaucracy. University of California Press.
- Migone, A., & Howlett, M. (2013). Searching for substance: Externalization, politicization and the work of Canadian policy consultants 2006-2013. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7(1), 112–133. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=39939
- Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x
- Mintzberg, H. (1971). Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Management Science, 18(2), B-97-B-110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.18.2.B97
- Nay, O. (2012). How do policy ideas spread among international administrations? Policy entrepreneurs and bureaucratic influence in the UN response to AIDS. Journal of Public Policy, 32(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X11000183
- Newman, J., Cherney, A., & Head, B. W. (2016). Do policy makers use academic research? Reexamining the “two communities” theory of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12464
- OECD. (2010). Reviews of human resource management in government.
- Page, E. (2012). Policy without politicians: Bureaucratic influence in comparative perspective. Oxford University Press.
- Page, E. C. (2007). Middle level bureaucrats: Policy, discretion and control. In J. C. N. Raadschelders, T. A. J. Toonen, & F. M. Van der Meer (Eds.), The civil service in the 21st century (pp. 152–168). Springer.
- Palotti, P., & Freire, A. O. G. (2015). Servidores públicos federais: Novos olhares e perspectivas. ENAP.
- Pavett, C. M., & Lau, A. W. (1983). Managerial work: The influence of hierarchical level and functional specialty. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/256144
- Pedersen, M. J., Favero, N., Nielsen, V. L., & Meier, K. J. (2017). Public management on the ground: Clustering managers based on their behavior. International Public Management Journal, 22(2), 1–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2017.1396273
- Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2001). Civil servants and politicians: The changing balance. In Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. Politicians, bureaucrats and administrative reform (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
- Rourke, F. E. (1986). Bureaucratic power in national policymaking (4th ed.). Little, Brown and Company.
- Rourke, F. E. (1991). American bureaucracy in a changing political setting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 1(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037079
- Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
- Saguin, K., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2018). Policy work and capacities in a developing country: Evidence from the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2018.1436427
- Saint-Martin, D. (1998). Management consultants, the state, and the politics of administrative reform in Britain and Canada. Administration & Society, 30(5), 533–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399798305003
- Shingler, J., Van Loon, M. E., Alter, T. R., & Bridger, J. C. (2008). The importance of subjective data for public agency performance evaluation. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1101–1111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-6
- Tengblad, S. (2006). Is there a ‘new managerial work’? A comparison with Henry Mintzberg’s classic study 30 years later. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1437–1461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00651.x
- Veselý, A., Ochrana, F., & Nekola, M. (2018). When Evidence is not taken for granted: The use and perception of “evidence” in the Czech republic ministries. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 11(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0020
- Williams, M. J. (2017). The political economy of unfinished development projects: Corruption, clientelism, or collective choice? American Political Science Review, 111(4), 705–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000351
- Wolf, P. J. (1993). A case survey of bureaucratic effectiveness in US cabinet agencies: Preliminary results. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037165
- Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1991). The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85(3), 801–828. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1963851