References
- Ahn, M. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2011). Politics of e‐government: E‐government and the political control of bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 414–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02225.x
- Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
- Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
- Baum, C., Schaffer, M., & Stillman, S. (2003). Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata Journal, 3(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0300300101
- Bellanca, S., & Vandernoot, J. (2014). International public sector accounting standards (IPSAS) implementation in the European Union (EU) member states. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 10(3), 257–269. http://www.davidpublisher.org/index.php/Home/Article/index?id=1299.html
- Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
- Biondi, Y. (2014). Harmonising European public sector accounting standards (EPSAS): Issues and perspectives for Europe’s economy and society. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 4(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2014-0015
- Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., Cohen, S., & Manes-Rossi, F. (2015). Comparing accounting systems in Europe. In I. Brusca, E. Caperchione, S. Cohen, & F. Manes-Rossi (Eds.), Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe (pp. 235–251). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Brusca, I., Montesinos, V., & Chow, D. S. (2013). Legitimating international public sector accounting standards (IPSAS): The case of Spain. Public Money & Management, 33(6), 437–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2013.836006
- Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e‐Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00216
- Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2019). Determinants of E-government adoption: Testing the mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 850–865. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989
- Christiaens, J., Vanhee, C., Manes-Rossi, F., Aversano, N., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: An international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), 158–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314546580
- Cruz, C., Keefer, P., & Scartascini, C. (2018). The database of political institutions 2015 (DPI2015). Inter-American Development Bank.
- Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Citro, F., & Bisogno, M. (2020). The role of public-sector accounting in controlling corruption: An assessment of organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(4), 729–748. h ttps:// doi.org/0020852318819756
- Da Costa Marques, M. D. C. (2018). Public accounting and IPSAS in Portugal: The accounting standardization system for public administrations. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 14(4), 153–164. http://www.davidpublisher.org/index.php/Home/Article/index?id=35533.html
- Dahlberg, S., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Alvarado-Pachon, N., & Svensson, R. (2018). The quality of government basic dataset, version Jan18. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. (Retrieved 25 Feb 2018).
- Dawes, S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003
- Demchak, C. C., Friis, C., & La Porte, T. M. (2000). Webbing governance: National differences in constructing the public face. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Handbook of public information systems (pp. 179–196). Marcel Dekker.
- Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014, May). E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: An empirical investigation. World Development, 57, 114–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.005
- European Commission. (2013). Report from the commission to the council and the European Parliament, towards implementing harmonised public sector accounting standards in Member States. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52013DC0114
- Fang, Z. (2002). E-government in digital era: Concept, practice, and development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 10(2), 1–22. http://www.ijcim.th.org/past_editions/2002V10N2/article1.pdf
- Gallego-Álvarez, I., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2010). Are determining factors of municipal E-government common to a worldwide municipal view? An intra-country comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 423–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.011
- García-Sánchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frías-Aceituno, J. V. (2012). Determinants of e-government development: Some methodological issues. Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(3), 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v3n3p11
- Gil-Garcia, R. J., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
- Hardy, C. A., & Williams, S. P. (2011). Assembling e‐government research designs: A transdisciplinary view and interactive approach. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 405–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02361.x
- Holzer, M., & Manoharan, A. P. (2016). Digital governance in municipalities worldwide (2015-16). Seventh global e-governance survey: A longitudinal assessment of municipal websites throughout the world (pp. 1–86). National Center for Public Performance, Rutgers University-Newark. ISBN: 978-1537555966
- IFAC. (2000). Study 11-government financial reporting: Accounting issues and practices. [Retrieved 27 March, 2020, from] https://tinyurl.com/slqqxcd
- IFAC. (2008). Handbook of international public sector accounting pronouncements. 2018 Edition. International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved 27 March, 2020, from https://tinyurl.com/revjrv9
- IMF (2012). Data quality assessment framework. International Monetary Fund. [Retrieved 27 March, 2020, from] https://dsbb.imf.org/dqrs/DQAF
- Ingrams, A., Manoharan, A., Schmidthuber, L., & Holzer, M. (2020). Stages and determinants of e-government development: A twelve-year longitudinal study of global cities. International Public Management Journal, 23(6), 731–769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1467987
- Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 371–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003
- Justice, J. B., Melitski, J., & Smith, D. L. (2006). E-government as an instrument of fiscal accountability and responsiveness: do the best practitioners employ the best practices? American Review of Public Administration, 36(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005283797
- Laswad, F., & Redmayne, N. B. (2015). IPSAS or IFRS as the framework for public sector financial reporting? New Zealand preparers’ perspectives. Australian Accounting Review, 25(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12052
- Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
- Lee, C. P., Chang, K., & Berry, F. S. (2011). Testing the development and diffusion of E-government and E-democracy: A global perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.x
- Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to wegovernment: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
- Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-García, J. R. (2011). Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.007
- Manoharan, A. (2013). A study of the determinants of county E-government in the United States. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012437876
- Manoharan, A., & Ingrams, A. (2018). Conceptualizing E-government from local government perspectives. State and Local Government Review, 50(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X18763964
- Manoharan, A. P., Ingrams, A., Kang, D., & Zhao, H. (2020). Globalization and worldwide best practices in E-Government. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729182
- Marche, S., & McNiven, J. D. (2003). E‐government and e‐governance: The future isn’t what it used to be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De l’Administration, 20(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00306.x
- Meijer, A., & Bekkers, V. (2015). A metatheory of e-government: Creating some order in a fragmented research field. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.006
- Mensah, I. K. (2020). Impact of government capacity and E-government performance on the adoption of E-Government services. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1628059
- Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of E-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
- Moon, M. J., Lee, J., & Roh, C.-Y. (2014). The evolution of internal IT applications and E-Government studies in public administration: Research themes and methods. Administration & Society, 46(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712459723
- Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of E-government use. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006
- Norris, D. F., & Jae Moon, M. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x
- OECD. (2003). The e-government imperative: Main findings. http://www.oecd.org/mena/governance/36853121.pdf
- OECD. (2005). Good practice paper on ICTs for economic growth and poverty reduction. The DAC Journal, 6(3), 27–95. ISSN: 15633152
- OECD/IFAC. (2017). Accrual practices and reform experiences in OECD countries. OECD Publishing.
- Oulasvirta, L. (2014). The reluctance of a developed country to choose international public sector accounting standards of the IFAC: A critical case study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.12.001
- Park, S., Choi, Y. T., & Bok, H. S. (2013). Does better e-readiness induce more use of e-government? Evidence from the Korean central e-government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 767–789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313501247
- Pina, V., Torres, L., & Acerete, B. (2007). Are ICTs promoting government accountability? A comparative analysis of e-governance developments in 19 OECD countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18(5), 583–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2006.01.012
- Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2010). Is e-government promoting convergence towards more accountable local governments? International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 350–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2010.524834
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (Ed.). (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford University Press.
- PwC. (2013). Towards a new era in government accounting and reporting. (Retrieved 6 June, 2018, from) https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/psrc/publications/assets/pwc-global–ipsas-survey-government-accounting-and-reporting-pdf.pdf
- PwC. (2014) Collection of information related to the potential impact, including costs, of implementing accrual accounting in the public sector and technical analysis of the suitability of individual IPSAS standards - 2013/S 107-182395. (Retrieved 6 June, 2018, from) http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/1015035/4261806/EPSAS-study-final-PwC-report.pdf
- Reddick, C. G., Abdelsalam, H. M., & Elkadi, H. (2011). The influence of E‐Government on administrative discretion: The case of local governments in Egypt. Public Administration and Development, 31(5), 390–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.615
- Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age (1nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2011). Determining factors of E-government development: A worldwide national approach. International Public Management Journal, 14(2), 218–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2011.597152
- Schelin, S. H. (2003). E-government: An overview. Hershey (Vol. 10, pp. 978). PA: Idea Group Publishing.
- Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 298–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701590553
- Stier, S. (2015). Political determinants of e-government performance revisited: Comparing democracies and autocracies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 270–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.004
- Thorsten, B., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.1.165
- Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E‐Governance Developments in European Union Cities: Reshaping Government’s Relationship with Citizens. Governance, 19(2), 277–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2006.00315.x
- UN. (2018). 2018 E-Government survey. Department of economic and social affairs, United Nations. (Retrieved 27 March, 2020, from) https://tinyurl.com/qu4qrdx
- UN Development Program. (2006). Fighting corruption with e-government applications. APDIP e-note 8. (Retrieved 1 October, 2013, from) http://www.unapcict.org/ecohub/resources/apdip-e-note-8-fighting-corruptionwith-e
- UN Development Program. (2008). Tackling corruption, transforming lives: Accelerating human development in Asia and the Pacific. Macmillan Publishers.
- Wong, W., & Welch, E. (2004). Does e-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of website openness and government accountability. Governance, 17(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00246.x
- Wooldridge, J. M. (Ed.). (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press.
- Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002