A Literature Review of E-government Services with Gamification Elements

References

• Accenture. (2004). eGovernment leadership: Engaging the customer (Technical report).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Yafi, K., & El-Masri, M. (2016). Gamification of e-Government services: A discussion of potential transformation. Gamification of e-Government Services: A Potential Transformation. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2016/eGov/Presentations/8/
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, C., & Di Maio, A. (2000). Gartner’s four phases of e-government model. Gartner Group, 12. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/317292/gartner-s-four-phases-of-e-government-model
   Google Scholar
• Bista, S. K., Nepal, S., Colineau, N., & Paris, C. (2012). Using gamification in an online community, 8th international conference on collaborative computing: Networking, applications and worksharing (collaborateCom) (pp. 611–618). Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bista, S. K., Nepal, S., & Paris, C. (2013). Data abstraction and visualisation in next step: Experiences from a government services delivery trial. Proceedings - 2013 IEEE international congress on Big Data, BigData 2013 (pp. 263–270). Santa Clara, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Blazhko, O., Luhova, T., Melnik, S., & Ruvinska, V. (2017). Communication model of open government data gamification based on Ukrainian websites. Proceedings of 2017 4th experiment at international conference: Online experimentation, exp.at 2017. IEEE (pp. 181–186). Faro, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, Y.-K. (2015). Actionable gamification, beyond points, badges, and leaderboards. Octalysis Media.
   Google Scholar
• Coronado Escobar, J. E., & Vasquez Urriago, A. R. (2014). Gamification: An effective mechanism to promote civic engagement and generate trust? Proceedings of the 8th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 514–515). New York, NY: ICEGOV ’14, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte Consulting. (2000). At the Dawn of e-GOVERNMENT. The citizen as customer.
   Google Scholar
• Économie et territoire. (2015). Nextsuisse: Au plus près des aspirations de la population. economiesuisse.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Fadel, L. M., Ulbricht, V. R., Batista, C. R., & Tarcísio, V. (2014). Gamificação na Educação. Pimenta Cultural.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, F. T., & Junior, P. T. A. (2016). Gamification aspects in the context of electronic government and education: A case study. In International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organization (pp.140–150). Springer, Cham. . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_14
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, L. S., Walz, S. P., & Greuter, S. (2013). Towards personalised, gamified systems: An investigation into game design, personality and player typologies. Proceedings of the 9th Australasian conference on interactive entertainment: Matters of life and death, IE ’13. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., Gauld, R., & Herbison, P. (2009). The participation divide? political participation, trust in government, and E-government in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00643.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodspeed, R. (2011). From public records to open government: Access to Massachusetts municipal geographic data. URISA Journal, 23(2), 21–32. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~rgoodspe/papers/Goodspeed23_2_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., & Tuunanen, J. (2014). Player types: A meta-synthesis. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 1(2), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v1i2.13
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2008). User experience (UX). Proceedings of the 20th international conference of the association francophone d’interaction homme-machine on - IHM ’08 (p. 11). Metz France.
   Google Scholar
• Hiller, J. S., & Bélanger, F. (2001). Privacy Strategies for Electronic Government. E- Government Series, PwC Endowment for the Business of Government. PricewaterhouseCoopers.
   Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L. (2011). Exploring customer brand engagement: Definition and themes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(7), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2011.599493
   Google Scholar
• Hun. (2014). HunchBuzz: A crowdsourcing startup helps. https://hunchbuzz.com/
   Google Scholar
• Hunicke, R., Leblanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). Mda: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the challenges in games AI workshop, nineteenth national conference of artificial intelligence (pp. 1–5). San Jose, CA: Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, K., Füller, J., & Koch, G. (2011). Why citizens engage in open government platforms? GI-Jahrestagung. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, S. (2013). Gamification Model Canvas. GECON.es.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. T., Lee, W.-H., Tae, K. J., & Lee, W.-H. (2015). Dynamical model for gamification of learning (DMGL). Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(19), 8483–8493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1612-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical report). Keele University and Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. M., Tan, X., & Trimi, S. (2005). Current practices of leading e-government countries. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/1089107.1089112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marczewski, A. (2013). Gamification: A simple introduction. Andrzej Marczewski.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, H. (2001). e-Government across the globe: How will “ e ” change government ? Government Finance Review, 17(4), 6–9. https://www.academia.edu/2259802/e_Government_Across_the_Globe_How_Will_e_Change_Government
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. A., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in human behavior. Contemporary Sociology, 17(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2070638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of E-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepal, S., Bista, S., Colineau, N., & Paris, C. (2013). Using gamification in an online community. 8th international conference on collaborative computing: Networking, applications and worksharing (CollaborateCom) (611–618). Pittsburgh: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2015). A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Opromolla, A., Ingrosso, A., Volpi, V., Medaglia, C. M., Palatucci, M., & Pazzola, M. (2015). Gamification in a smart city context. An analysis and a proposal for its application in co-design processes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9221: 73–82. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, W., Lin, J. H., Pfeiffer, K. A., & Winn, B. (2012). Need satisfaction supportive game features as motivational determinants: An experimental study of a self- determination theory guided exergame. Media Psychology, 15(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.673850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakhmawati, N. A., & Fibrianto, B. (2017). Designing a gamification for monitoring Surabaya City development. Proceedings of 2016 international conference on information and communication technology and systems, ICTS 2016 pp. 262–265. Surabaya, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. G. (2004). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2003.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M., Monteiro, V., Fernandes, B., Silva, F., Analide, C., & Santos, R. (2019a). A gamification framework for getting residents closer to public institutions. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11, 4569–4581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01586-7
   Google Scholar
• Ronaghan, S. A. (2002). Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective (Technical report). United Nations. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54142-6_9
   Google Scholar
• Supendi, K., & Prihatmanto, A. S. (2016). Design and implementation of the assesment of publik officers web base with gamification method. Proceedings of the 2015 4th international conference on interactive digital media, ICIDM 2015. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050917329587.
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, S.-K. (2017). Let’s play urban planner: The use of game elements in public participation platforms. plaNext - Next Generation Planning, 4(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2017.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, S. K., & Frohlich, P. (2017). Gamification as motivation to engage in location- based public participation? Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (pp. 399–421). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47289-8_20
   Google Scholar
• Toda, A. M., Klock, A. C. T., Oliveira, W., Palomino, P. T., Rodrigues, L., Shi, L., Bittencourt, I., Gasparini, I., Isotani, S., & Cristea, A. I. (2019). Analysing gamification elements in educational environments using an existing Gamification taxonomy. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0106-1
   Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. Handbook of Self-determination Research, 128, 37–63. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-01702-002
   Google Scholar
• Veeckman, C., & Van Der Graaf, S. (2018). The city as living laboratory: Empowering citizens with the citadel toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(3), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/877
   Google Scholar
• Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. https://www.amazon.com/Win-Game-Thinking-Revolutionize-Business/dp/1613630239
   Google Scholar
• Wescott, C. G. (2001). E-Government in the Asia-pacific region. Asian Journal of Political Science, 9(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185370108434189
   Google Scholar
• West, D. M. (2004). E-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., & Kuhn, J. (2015). Open government objectives and participation motivations. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., & Göttel, V. (2016). Technology acceptance in social media: Review, synthesis and directions for future empirical research. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 17(2), 97–115. http://web.csulb.edu/journals/jecr/issues/20162/Paper1.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Rösch, M. (2018). Citizen and open government: An empirical analysis of antecedents of open government data. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1263659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2002). The world bank new-economy sector study electronic government and governance: Lessons for Argentina (Technical report).
   Google Scholar
• Wukich, C., & Mergel, I. (2015). Closing the citizen-government communication gap: Content, audience, and network analysis of government tweets. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 12(3), 707–735. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: {ProQuest} tech books. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar