On Higher Education’s Complexities and the Potential of Network Governance. A Case Study

References

• Adcroft, A., & Willis, R. (2005). The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(5), 386–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510608859
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 171–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732731
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. C. (2008). The impact of public management reforms on student performance in Danish schools. Public Administration, 86(2), 541–558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or Chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9–10), 749–765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-200067320
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J R. M.O. Pritchard & A. Pausits & J. Williams (Eds.),(2007). If you can’t measure it, how can you manage it? Management and governance in higher educational institutions. Public Money & Management, 27(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00579.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broucker, B., & De Wit, K. (2015). New public management in higher education. In J. Huisman, H. de Boer, D. Dill & M. Souto-Otero (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of higher education policy and governance (pp. 57–75). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Broucker, B., De Wit, K., & Leisyte, L. (2016). Higher education reform. In R. M.O. Pritchard & A. Pausits & J. Williams (Eds.), Positioning higher education institutions (pp. 19–40). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Broucker, B., De Wit, K., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2017). Higher education research: Looking beyond new public management. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 21–38). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Broucker, B., Huisman, J., Verhoeven, J., & De Wit, K. (2018). The state of the art of higher education research on Flanders. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 225–241). Emerald Publishing Limited. 4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220180000004014 Open Access.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2007). Transcending new public management: The transformation of public sector reforms. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. (2012). Post-NPM and changing public governance. Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics, 1(1), 1–11. http://153.122.154.161/articles/files/01-01/01-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dal Molin, M., Turri, M., & Agasisti, T. (2017). New public management reforms in the Italian universities: Managerial tools, accountability mechanisms or simply compliance? International Journal of Public Administration, 40(3), 256–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1107737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Leysite, L. (2007). Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2008). Comparing higher education governance systems in four European countries N.C. Soguel & P. Jaccard, (Eds.) . In Governance and performance of education systems(pp. 35-54). Springer 35–54 .
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, H., & File, J. (2009). Higher education governance reforms across Europe. Brussels: ESMU.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M., & Nemec, J. (2013). Public sector reform: An overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293408
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education, 62(5), 665–683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9412-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, A., & Laville, J. (Eds.). (2004). The third sector in Europe. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frølich, N. (2011). Implementation of new public management in Norwegian Universities. European Journal of Education, 40(2), 223–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2005.00221.x
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. (2007). Reintegrating Government in Third Generation Reforms of Australia and New Zealand. Public Policy and Administration, 22(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076707075899
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Healey-Etten, V., & Sharp, S. (2010). Teaching undergraduates how to do an in-depth interview: A teaching note with 12 handy tips. Teaching Sociology, 38(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X10364010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B.W.A. (2005). Characteristics of the higher education system. Supporting the contribution of higher education institutes to regional development. In I., Sijgers, M. Hammer, W. ter Horst, P. Nieuwenhuis, and P. van der Sijde, (Eds.), Self-evaluation report of Twente (p. 11–22). OECD/IMHE.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B. (2015). Universities as hybrid organizations: Trends, drivers, and challenges for the European university. International Studies of Management & Organization, 45(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2015.1006027
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. M., & Stensaker, B. Eds. (2009). University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education (pp. VII–XIX). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Louise Barriball, K., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi‐structured interview: A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(2), 328–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01088.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maassen, P. (2017). The university’s governance paradox. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maassen, P. (2012). System diversity in European higher education. In M. Kwiek & A. Kurkiewicz (Eds.), The modernisation of European universities (pp. 79–96). Peter Lang Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713–739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergoni, A., & De Witte, K. (2021). Policy evaluation and efficiency: A systematic literature review. In International transactions in operational research. In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2017). Creating public value: Tightening connections between policy design and public management. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 170–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, H. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world class excellence. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 741–742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.617636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyters, G., Quanten, E., Broucker, B., De Witte, K., & Martens, P. (2018). Governancemodellen voor lerarenopleidingen met meerdere aanbieders. Tijdschrift Voor Onderwijsrecht En Onderwijsbeleid, 2018(1), 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Nõmm, K., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2012). Performance measurement and performance information in new democracies. A study of the Estonian central government. Public Management Review, 14(7), 859–879. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.657835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance?
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: An international comparison. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2013.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, & Wright, G. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting. Role of the Delphi technique. In Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting: A handbook of researchers and practitioners. Kluwer Academic Publishers 125–144 .
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A., & Rabovsky, T. (2014). Evaluating impacts of performance funding policies on student outcomes in higher education. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 655(1), 185–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214541048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattock, M. (2008). The change from private to public governance of British higher education: Its consequences for higher education policy making 1980–2006. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(3), 181–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00392.x
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. (2014). Case study research: In-depth understanding in context. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, M. (2001). Reinserting the ‘public good’ into higher education transformation. Kagisano Higher Education Discussion Series, 1, 8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Tahar, S., Niemeyer, C., & Boutellier, R. (2011). Transferral of business management concepts to universities as ambidextrous organisations. Tertiary Education and Management, 17(4), 289–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.589536
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (2008a). Competing public values and performance. In KPMG, CAPM, IPAA and IPAC Holy grail or achievable quest—International perspectives on public sector performance management. KPMG 141–152 .
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (2008b). Measuring public value—a competing values approach. The Work Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2009). Strengthening the link between performance measurement and decision-making. Public Administration, 87(4), 853–871. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01788.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/210361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2013). What’s in a name? Grasping new public governance as a political-administrative system. International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 9–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2013.10805250
   Google Scholar
• Try, D., & Radnor, Z. (2007). Developing an understanding of results-based management through public value theory. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(7), 655–673. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550710823542
   Google Scholar
• van der Wal, Z., van Hout, E., & Th, J. (2009). Is public value pluralism paramount? The intrinsic multiplicity and hybridity of public values. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 220–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732681
   Google Scholar
• van Vught, F., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2012). Multidimensional ranking: A new transparency tool for higher education and research. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-22-5km32wkjhf24
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Sage.
   Google Scholar