Hybridity in Nordic Higher Education

References

• Antonowicz, D., Geschwind, L., & Pinheiro, R. (2021). The Footballisation of European Higher Education: Different fields, similar ball games? In J. Branch & B. Christiansen (Eds.), The Marketisation Of Higher Education: concepts, cases, and criticisms. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, L., & Pinheiro, R. (2016). Handling different institutional logics in the public sector: Comparing management in Norwegian universities and hospitals. In R. Pinheiro, F. Ramirez, K. Vrabæk, & L. Geschwind (Eds.), Towards a comparative institutionalism: Forms, dynamics and logics across health care and higher education fields (pp. 145–168). Emerald, Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Billis, D. (2010). Towards a theory of hybrid organisations. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., & Lepori, B. (2017). Setting the stage: Theory and research questions. In I. Bleiklie, J. Enders, & B. Lepori (Eds.), Managing universities: Policy and organisational change from a western comparative perspective (pp. 3–30). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. (2007). The academic profession and increasing expectations of relevance. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession. UNESCO forum on higher education research and knowledge. IN HER-Kassel. International center for Higher education research Kassel.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruckmann, S., & Carvalho, T. (2018). Understanding change in higher education: An archetypal approach. Higher Education, 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0229-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., & Kivistö, J. (2013). Tuition fees for international students in Finland: Where to go from here? Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311429001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. (2011). Japanese university reform: Hybridity in governance and management. Higher Education Policy, 24(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organisation in cross-national perspective. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response. Tertiary Education & Management, 4(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.1998.9966941
   Google Scholar
• Conrath-Hargreaves, A., & Wüstemann, S. (2018). Multiple institutional logics and their impact on accounting in higher education: The case of a German foundation university. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(3), 782–810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2017-3095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, R. (2005). Wicked problems revisited. Design studies, 26 (1), 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, R. The knowledge worker, the manager-academic and the contemporary UK university: New and old forms of public management? (2004). Financial Accountability & Management, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00189.x
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J. L., Ferlie, E., & Van Gestel, N. (2015). Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘mode 2ʹ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2000), 109–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. & Zhou, C. (2018). The triple helix. University – industry – government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. London and New York
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. Technology and Society Magazine, 20(2), 18–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/44.948843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and new public management: Changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8, 247–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156913309X421655
   Google Scholar
• Frølich, N. (2005). Implementation of new public management in Norwegian universities. European journal of education, 40(2), 223–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221853
   Google Scholar
• Geschwind, L., Aarrevaara, T., Berg, L. N., & Lind, J. K. (2019). The changing roles of academic leaders: Decision-making, power, and performance. In R. Pinheiro, L. Geschwind, H. Foss Hansen, & K. Pulkkinen (Eds.), Reforms, organizational change and performance in higher education (pp. 181–2010). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Geschwind, L., Kekäle, J., Pinheiro, R., & Sorensen, M. P. (2019). Responsible universities in context. In M. P. Sørensen, L. Geschwind, J. Kekäle, & R. Pinheiro (Eds.), The responsible university: Exploring the Nordic context and beyond (pp. 3–30). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. In The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, R. Globalization, university transformation and economic regeneration: A UK case study of public/private sector partnership. (2002). International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(3), 204–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550210423370
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., Coates, H., & McCormick, A. C. (2018). Quality, performance and accountability: Emergent challenges in the global era. In Research handbook on quality, performance and accountability in higher education. Edward Elgar Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, O., & Krücken, G. (2016). Nested organizational fields. Isomorphism and differentiation among European universities. The University under Pressure. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 46, 53–83 doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221853.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, J.-E., & Vakkuri, J. (2018). Governing hybrid organisations: Exploring diversity of institutional life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kallio, K-M., Kallio, T. J., Tienari, J., & Hyvönen, T. (2015). Ethos at stake: performance management and academic work in universities. Human Relations, 69(3), 685–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karré, P. M. (2020). Hybrid organisations: Between state and market. In D. Billis & C. Rochester (Eds.), Handbook on Hybrid organisations (pp. 31–47). Edwards Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, C. (2001). The Uses of the University. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kivistö, J., Pekkola, E., Berg, L. N., Hansen, H. F., Geschwind, L., & Lyytinen, A. (2019). Performance in higher education institutions and its variations in Nordic policy. In Reforms, organizational change and performance in higher education (pp. 37–67). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, M., Moses, I., & El-Khawas, E. (1994). Staffing higher education: Meeting new challenges. OECD. In Higher education policy series (pp. 27). Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, M., & Teichler, U. (2007). Key challenges to the academic profession and its interface with management: Some introductory thoughts. International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel.
   Google Scholar
• Krücken, K., & Torka, M. (2007). Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions. In K. Krücken & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions (pp. 7–18). Transcript. Science Studies. Verlag, Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2010). From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists’? Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University—Industry Boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709349963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D. C. Global higher education: An empirical profile of its size and geographical shape. (2018). Higher Education, 76(4), 701–715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0233-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listhaug, O., & Ringdal, K.et al (2008). Trust in political institutions. In Ervasti, H., Hjerm, Fridberg T., M., and Ringdal, K. Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective (131–151). Edward Elgar Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, P.et al (2014). A new social contract for higher education?. In Higher education in societies (pp. 33–50). In Goastellec, G., and Picard, F. (Eds.). (2014). A new social contract for higher education?. Springer
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. Higher education and public good. (2011). Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00496.x
   Google Scholar
• Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722–737 doi:https://doi.org/10.111/sode.12018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. (2015). Hybrid professionalism and beyond: (new) forms of public professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 2(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). ‘Mode 2ʹ revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41(3), 179–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSD (2021). Database for statistics on Norwegian higher education. https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L. D. (2012). From privatised to hybrid corporatised higher education: A global financial management discourse. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(3), 247–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00544.x
   Google Scholar
• Pekkola, E., & Kivistö, J. (2012). Reforming the Finnish university system: Policies and institutional responses. In B. Sjur (Ed.), Leadership and governance in higher education: Handbook for decision-makers and administrators (pp. 87–105). Raabe.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkola, E., & Kivistö, J. (2016). Higher education governance and reforms. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkola, E., Piñheiro, R., Geschwind, L., Siekkinen, T., Pulkkinen, K., & Carvalho, T. (2020). Nested hybridity in Nordic Higher Education. In J. Vakkuri (Ed.), Hybrid governance, organisation and society: Value creation and value capture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkola, E., Siekkinen, T., Kivistö, J., & Lyytinen, A. (2018). Management and academic profession: Comparing the Finnish professors with and without management positions. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1949–1963. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1294578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., & Benneworth, P. (2018). The regional role of higher education. In J. C. Shin & P. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. Nested tensions and interwoven dilemmas in higher education: The view from the Nordic countries. (2014). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., Hansen, H. F., & Pulkkinen, K. (Eds.). (2019). Reforms, organizational change and performance in higher education: A comparative account from the Nordic countries. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., & Young, M. (2017). The university as an adaptive resilient organization: A complex systems perspective. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 119–136). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen, K., Aarrevaara, T., Berg, L. N., Geschwind, L., Hansen, H. F., Hernes, H., and Söderlind, J. (2019). Does it really matter? Assessing the performance effects of changes in leadership and management structures in Nordic higher education. In Reforms, Organizational Change and Performance in Higher Education (pp. 3–36). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
   Google Scholar
• Ramaley, J. A. (2014). The changing role of higher education: Learning to deal with wicked problems. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(3), 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen A.et al (2003) New Public Management and Finnish Public Sector Organisations: The Case of Universities. In: Amaral A., Meek V.L., and Larsen I.M. (eds) New Public Management and Finnish Public Sector Organisations: The Case of Universities. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht
   Google Scholar
• Siekkinen, T. (2019), The changing relationship between the academic profession and universities in finnish higher education, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, available at: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/66391
   Google Scholar
• Siekkinen, T., Pekkola, E., & Carvalho, T. (2019). Change and continuity in the academic profession: Finnish universities as living labs. Higher Education, 79, 533–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00422-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., and Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism. Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., and Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism. Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L.et al (2011). Accountability: Understandings and challenges. In Stensaker, B., and Harvey, L. (Eds.), Accountability in higher education (pp. 23–38). Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., Saunders, M., and Bamber, V. (Eds.). (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Vabø, A., & Aamodt, P. O. (2008). Nordic higher education in transition. Structuring Mass Higher Education: The Role of Elite Institutions, 57–71
   Google Scholar
• Välimaa, J.et al (2012). The corporatization of national universities in Finland. In: B. Pusser, K. Kempner, S. Marginson, and I. Odorika (Eds.), Universities and the Public Sphere. Knowledge Creation and State Building in the Era of Globalization, 101–119. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Välimaa, J. (2019). A history of finnish higher education from the middle ages to the twenty-first century. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Gestel, N., Denis, J. L., & Ferlie, E. (2020). Hybridity in public organisations. In D. Billis & C. Rochester (Eds.), Handbook on hybrid organisations (pp. 48–65). Edwards Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whitchurch, C. (2008). Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emerge of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 377–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00387.x
   Google Scholar
• Whitchurch, C. Some implications of ‘public/private’ space for professional identities in higher education. (2010). Higher Education, 60(6), 627–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9320-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiers-Jenssen, J. (2019). Paradoxical attraction? Why an increasing number of international students choose Norway. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318786449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R., & Bolde, R. (2020). Hybridity in higher education. In. In D. Billis & C. Rochester (Eds.), Handbook on hybrid organisations (pp. 169–185). Edwards Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar