Open Government: Development, Concept, and Future Research Directions

References

• Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2015). Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ågerfalk, P. J. (2014). Insufficient theoretical contribution: a conclusive rationale for rejection?. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancado Dias, J. P., Da Costa, F. J. L., & de Oliveira Almeida, G. (2018). Public Transparency in Brazil and the Open Government Partnership - OGP. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance, 5(12), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.19085/sijmas051201
   Google Scholar
• Chatwin, M., Arku, G., & Cleave, E. (2019). Defining subnational open government: does local context influence policy and practice?. Policy Sciences, 52(3), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-09347-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatwin, M., & Arku, G. (2018). Co-creating an Open Government Action Plan: The Case of Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolitan Assembly, Ghana. Growth and change, 49(2), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building Theory about Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, A., Henriques, I., Husted, B. W., & Matten, D. (2016). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution in the Business and Society Field?. Business & Society, 55(6), 783–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316651343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado, J. I., Ruvalcaba-Gómez, E. A., & Valenzuela-Mendoza, R. (2018). Revisiting the Open Government Phenomenon. A Meta-Analysis of the International Literature. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 10(1), 50–81. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v10i1.454
   Google Scholar
• Criado, J. I., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A. (2018). Perceptions of City Managers About Open Government Policies. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2018010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado, J. I., & Villodre, J. (2018). Public employees in social media communities: Exploring factors for internal collaboration using social network analysis. First Monday, 23(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i4.8348
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, H., & Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410210748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, Á., & Soares, D. (2014). Open government data initiatives in Europe. In E. Estevez, M. Janssen, & L. S. Barbosa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV ‘14 (pp. 342–350). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691195.2691246
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Feeney, M. K. (2017). Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., Mueller, R. O., & Stapleton, L. M. (2010). The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, K., Belkacem, K., & Ekenberg, L. (2015). Open Government and Democracy: A Research Review. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 540–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W. K., & van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00076
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2016). State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda. Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1124007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbarda, P., & Xiao, W. (2017). Open government information in Chinese state-owned enterprises. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 22(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170403
   Google Scholar
• Ingrams, A. (2018). Transparency for Results: Testing a Model of Performance Management in Open Government Initiatives. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(13), 1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1318400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., Díaz-Puente, J. M., & Martin, S. (2019). The Contribution of Open Government to Prosperity of Society. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1405446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. K. (2017). Exploring Online Engagement in Public Policy Consultation: The Crowd or the Few?. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabić, M., & Gašpar, D. (2018). Open Government, Social Media and Western Balkan Countries. Central European Public Administration Review, 16(2), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2018.2.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Harzing, A.-W., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017). Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2020). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126, 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minelli, A., & Ruffini, R. (2018). Citizen feedback as a tool for continuous improvement in local bodies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01–2017-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2020). Shifting from Old Open Government to New Open Government: Four Critical Dimensions and Case Illustrations. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1691024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opengovpartnership.org. (2020). Overview of the members. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/our-members/
   Google Scholar
• Pina, G., & Avellaneda, C. (2019). Central Government Strategies to Promote Local Governments’ Transparency: Guidance or Enforcement?. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1462215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. (2017). The “Open Government Reform” Movement: The Case of the Open Government Partnership and U.S. Transparency Policies. American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016676575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S., Rosenbloom, D. H., Kang, S., & Ingrams, A. (2018). Levels of Value Integration in Federal Agencies’ Mission and Value Statements: Is Open Government a Performance Target of U.S. Federal Agencies?. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (2014). What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruijer, E., & Martinius, E. (2017). Researching the democratic impact of open government data: A systematic literature review. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 22(4), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3E [Third ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, S. (2018). Summarizing the decadal literature in open government data (OGD) research: a systematic review. Foresight, 20(6), 648–664. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-07-2018-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidthuber, L., Hilgers, D., Gegenhuber, T., & Etzelstorfer, S. (2017). The emergence of local open government: Determinants of citizen participation in online service reporting. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidthuber, L., & Hilgers, D. (2018). Unleashing Innovation beyond Organizational Boundaries: Exploring Citizensourcing Projects. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1263656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidthuber, L., Piller, F., Bogers, M., & Hilgers, D. (2019). Citizen participation in public administration: investigating open government for social innovation. R&D Management, 49(3), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidthuber, L., Stütz, S., & Hilgers, D. (2019). Outcomes of open government: Does an online platform improve citizens’ perception of local government?. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2018-0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell, S., & Jo, S. (2019). Which Countries Have More Open Governments? Assessing Structural Determinants of Openness. American Review of Public Administration, 49(8), 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019854445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahiu, I. (2015). Government Transparency in Albania and the Role of the European Union. European Public Law, 21 (1), 109–141. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=100780692&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2014). United Nations E-Government survey: E-Government for the future we want. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2014-Survey/EGov_Complete_Survey-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Han, J. H., & Beynon-Davies, P. (2019). Understanding Blockchain Technology for Future Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House. (2009). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Open government directive. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., & Kuhn, J. (2015). Open government objectives and participation motivations. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(5), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., Daiser, P., & Mermann, M. (2018). Social Media as a Leverage Strategy for Open Government: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(8), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1289388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Rösch, M. (2017). Open government and citizen participation: an empirical analysis of citizen expectancy towards open government data. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 566–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317719996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Rösch, M. (2018). Citizen and Open Government: An Empirical Analysis of Antecedents of Open Government Data. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1263659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wootten, G. W., & Kiss, S. J. (2019). The Ambiguous Definition of Open Government: Parliamentarians, Journalists and Bloggers Define Open Government In Accordance With Their Interests. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423918000446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zientek, L. R., Werner, J. M., Campuzano, M. V., & Nimon, K. (2018). The Use of Google Scholar for Research and Research Dissemination. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 30(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderwijk, A., Helbig, N., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Janssen, M. (2014). Innovation through open data: A review of the state-of-the-art and an emerging research agenda. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 9(2), I–XIII. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar