What Does This Button Do? Departmental Restructurings, Information Processing, and Administrative Errors

References

• Andeweg, R. B. (2000). Ministers as double agents? The delegation process between cabinet and ministers. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacharach, S. B., & Aiken, M. (1976). Structural and process constraints on influence in organizations: A level-specific analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun, J. (2007). The practice of organizational restructuring: From design to reality. European Management Journal, 25(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. A. Y., & Felin, T. (2013). What are microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2014). The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekker, R. (2017). Werken aan een moderne overheid. BZK.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, H. (2016, March 30). BZK sluit de luiken. Binnenlands Bestuur. https://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/bestuur-en-organisatie/leegloop-bij-bzk-na-reorganisatie
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J. B. (1985). Parallel Systems: Redundancy in Government. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertels, J., & Schulze‐Gabrechten, L. (2021). Mapping the black box of intraministerial organization: An analytical approach to explore structural diversity below the Portfolio level. Governance, 34(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borstlap, H., & Joustra, T. H. J. (2017). Onderzoek naar Besluitvormingsprocedures binnen de Belastingdienst. Commissie Onderzoek Belastingdienst.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P. (1996). Signal processing, hierarchy, and budgetary control in Federal Regulation. The American Political Science Review, 90(2), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, B. J., Bertels, J., Froio, C., Kuipers, S., Schulze-Gabrechten, L., & Viallet-Thévenin, S. (2020). Between life and death: Organizational change in central state bureaucracies in cross-national comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Advance Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320964558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M. H., & Harrington, J. E., Jr (2006). Agent-based models of organizations. In L. Tesfatsion & K. L. Judd (Eds.). Handbook of computational economics (pp. 1273–1337). Elsevier Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2012). Competing principles of agency organization–the reorganization of a reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(4), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312455306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commissie Van Dam. (2020). Ongekend Onrecht. Parlementaire Ondervragingscommissie Kinderopvangtoeslag.
   Google Scholar
• Commissie Wiegel. (1993). Naar kerndepartementen. Kiezen voor een hoogwaardige en flexibele Rijskdienst. Vierde externe commissie staatkundige, bestuurlijke en staatsrechtelijke vernieuwing.
   Google Scholar
• Csaszar, F. A. (2012). Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 611–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G., Weller, P., Eggins, S., & Craswell, E. (1999). What drives machinery of government change? Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, 1950–1997. Public Administration, 77(1), 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döhler, M. (2017). The bias of structures: How multidivisional organizations work in the public sector. Public Organization Review, 17(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0329-8
   Google Scholar
• Döhler, M. (2020). The architecture of organizations as missed opportunity in political research. Public Administration, 98(4), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (2003). How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 116–126). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, R. C., & Randolph, W. A. (1992). Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, J. W. (1986). The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, T. J. (1986). Agenda control, organizational structure, and bureaucratic politics. American Journal of Political Science, 30(2), 379–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegger, F. (2017, January 27). Wiebes door het stof na vernietigend rapport. RTL Nieuws. https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/nieuws/nederland/artikel/212631/wiebes-door-het-stof-na-vernietigend-rapport
   Google Scholar
• Heimann, C. L. (1993). Understanding the challenger disaster: Organizational structure and the design of reliable systems. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M. G. (2007). The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organization Science, 18(3), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005.). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, J., & Gaba, V. (2020). Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 267–302. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J., & Ocasio, W. (2012). Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General electric from 1951 to 2001. Strategic Management Journal, 33 (6) , 633–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen, T., & Levinthal, D. A. (2007). Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organization Science, 18(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroeze, R., & Keulen, S. (2015). Van VoMil, via VROM naar IenM: Hoe beleidsmakers en managers geschiedenis kunnen gebruiken. historici.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, S., Yesilkagit, K., & Carroll, B. J. (2021). Ministerial influence on the machinery of government: Insights on the inside. West European Politics, 44(4), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1768737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtmannegger, C. (2019). Task Environment matters for intra-ministerial change: The interaction of international environment, organizational and opportunity factors. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1458865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtmannegger, C., & Bach, T. (2020). The interaction of multiple drivers of intra-organizational change in ministerial administrations: A study of three decades of structural reforms in the Austrian Ministry of Agriculture. Public Policy and Administration. Advance Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720904439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCarthaigh M and Roness P. G. (2012). Analyzing longitudinal continuity and change in public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(12), 773–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.715567
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McEviley, B., Soda, G., & Tortoriello, M. (2014). More formally: Rediscovering the missing link between formal organization and informal social structure. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 299–345. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.885252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Culture, & Science. (2005). Organisatie- en mandaatbesluit OCW 2005. OCW.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Culture & Science. (2021). Organogram – Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap (januari 2021). https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/ministeries/ministerie-van-onderwijs-cultuur-en-wetenschap/documenten/publicaties/2018/10/15/organogram-ministerie-van-ocw
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Culture, & Science. (2022). Adviseur onderzoek & data onderwijs [GEARCHIVEERD]. https://vacaturedata.nl/adviseur-onderzoek-and-data-onderwijs-15258
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior Affairs & Kingdom Relations. (2017). Rijksjaarverslag 2016: VII Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties. BZK.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior Affairs & Kingdom Relations. (n.d.). Het SG-DG Model. Retrieved February 4, 2022, from https://www.organisatierijksdienst.nl/de-inrichting-van-ministeries/het-sg-dg-model
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (1995). The politics of structural choice: Toward a theory of public bureaucracy. In O. E. Williamson (Ed.), Organization theory: From Chester Barnard to the present and beyond (pp. 213–253). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, P. B., & Green-Pedersen, C. (2015). Institutional effects of changes in political attention: Explaining organizational changes in the top bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 187–206. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, J. F. (1980). Bounded rationality in budgetary research. American Political Science Review, 74(2), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2009). Bureaucracies remember, post-bureaucratic organizations forget? Public Administration, 87(2), 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01738.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitzig, M., & Maciejovsky, B. (2015). Corporate hierarchy and vertical information flows inside the firm – A behavioral view. Strategic Management Journal, 36(13), 1979–1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid. (n.d.a). Het Actorenregister. https://actorenregister.nationaalarchief.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid. (n.d.b). De Inrichting van Ministeries: Programma's en Projecten. https://www.organisatierijksdienst.nl/de-inrichting-van-ministeries/programmas-en-projecten
   Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid. (n.d.c). Programma directoraat-generaal Omgevingswet. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/ministeries/ministerie-van-binnenlandse-zaken-en-koninkrijksrelaties/organisatie/organogram/programma-directoraat-generaal-omgevingswet
   Google Scholar
• Rudalevige, A. (2005). The structure of leadership: Presidents, hierarchies, and information flow. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2005.00252.x
   Google Scholar
• Sah, R. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1986). The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. American Economic Review, 76(4), 716–727 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1806069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieberer, U., Meyer, T. M., Back, H., Ceron, A., Falco-Gimeno, A., Guinaudeau, I., Hansen, M. E., Kolltveit, K., Louwerse, T., Muller, W. C., & Persson, T. (2021). The political dynamics of Portfolio design in European democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 51 (2), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (1997). Vaststelling van de begroting van de uitgaven en de ontvangsten van het Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (XVI) voor het jaar 1997. VWS.
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (2017). Brief van de Staatssecretaris en de Minister van Financiën. https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-31066-330.html
   Google Scholar
• Uitvoeringsorganisatie Bedrijfsvoering Rijksoverheid. (2021). Wendbaarheid in opgave en organisatie bij beleidsdirectie G&VW. https://www.ubrijk.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/02/01/wendbaarheid-in-opgave-en-organisatie-bij-beleidsdirectie-gvw
   Google Scholar
• Whetsell, T. A., Kroll, A., & DeHart-Davis, L. (2021). Formal hierarchies and informal networks: How organizational structure shapes information search in local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(4), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, A., & Dunleavy, P. (2010). Making and breaking whitehall departments: A guide to machinery of government changes. LSE Public Policy Group. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27949/.
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, A. B. (2006). Unitary, divisional, and matrix forms as political governance systems. Journal of Management & Governance, 10(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-006-9009-y
   Google Scholar
• Workman, S., Jones, B. D., & Joachim, A. E. (2009). Information processing and policy dynamics. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1). 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00296.xConsulted Documents
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. (2021). Besluit van de Minister van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport van 2 mei 2021, kenmerk 2350302-1007514-OBP, houdende de vaststelling van het Organisatiebesluit VWS 2021. https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2021-24286.html
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior Affairs & Kingdom Relations. (1988). Besluit regeling functie en verantwoordelijkheid van de secretaris-generaal. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0004419/1989-01-01
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior Affairs & Kingdom Relations. (2011). Coördinatiebesluit organisatie en bedrijfsvoering rijksdienst 2011. https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stb-2011-18.html#extrainformatie
   Google Scholar