Effects of Single and Combined Inoculations with Azospirillum brasilense and Trichoderma harzianum on Seedling Growth or Yield Parameters of Wheat (Triticum vulgaris L., Giza 168) and Corn (Zea mays L., Hybrid 310)

REFERENCES

• Abd-El-Haleem, D., U. Beshay, A. Abdelhamid, H. Moawad, and S. Zaki. 2003. Effects of mixed nitrogen sources on biodegradation of phenol by immobilized Acinetobacter sp. strain W-17. African Journal of Biotechnology 2: 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• American Public Health Association. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 19th ed. Part 4000, sec., 4–106. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Antoun, H., and D. Prèvost. 2005. Ecology of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: PGPR: Biocontrol and Biofertilization, Siddiqui, Z.A. (Ed.), Dordrecht, Germany: Springer, pp.1–38.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1996. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Arlington, VA: Arlington, Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Bashan, Y., and L.E. de-Bashan. 2005. Bacteria/plant growth-promotion. In: Hillel D, editor. Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. 1: 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Bashan, Y., J.P. Hernandez, L.A. Levya, and M. Bacilio. 2002. Alginate microbeads as inoculant carriers for plant growth-promoting bacteria. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35: 359–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashan, Y. 1998. Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnology Advances 15: 729–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashan, Y., and L.E. Gonzalez. 1999. Long-term survival of the plant-growth-promoting bacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens in dry alginate inoculant, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 51: 262–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benítez, T., A.M. Rincón, M.C. Limón, and A.C. Codón. 2004. Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. International Microbiology 7: 249–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beshay, U., D. Abd-El-Haleem, H. Moawad, and S. Zaki. 2002. Phenol biodegradation by free and immobilized Acinetobacter, Biotechnology Letter 24: 1295–1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloemberg, G.V., and B.J. J. Lugtenberg. 2001. Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4: 343–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottini, R., F. Cassán, and P. Piccoli. 2004. Gibberellin production by bacteria and its involvement in plant growth promotion and yield increase. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 65: 497–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G.D., and A.D. Rovira. 1999. The rhizosphere and its management to improve plant growth. Advances in Agronomy 66: 1–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassán, F., D. Perrig, V. Sgroy, O. Masciarelli, C. Penna, and V. Luna. 2009. Azospirillum brasilense Az39 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum E109, inoculated singly or in combination, promote seed germination and early seedling growth in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.), European Journal of Soil Biology 45: 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, M.B., H. Lee, and J.T. Trevors. 1996. Environmental applications of immobilized microbial cells: A review. The Journal of Industrial Microbiology 16: 17–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cattelan, A.J., P.G. Hartel, and J.J. Fuhrmann. 1999. Screening for plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to promote early soybean growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 1670–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de-Bashan, L.E., J.P. Hernandez, T. Morey, and Y. Bashan. 2004. Microalgae growth-promoting bacteria as “helpers” for microalgae: A novel approach for removing ammonium and phosphorus from municipal wastewater. Water Research 38: 466–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de-Bashan, L.E., M. Moreno, J.P. Hernandez, and Y. Bashan. 2002. Removal of ammonium and phosphorus ions from synthetic wastewater by the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris co-immobilized in alginate beads with the microalgae growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. Water Research 36: 2941–2948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Zorita, M., R. Baliña, M.V. Fernández-Canigia, C. Penna, and A. Perticari. 2004. Field inoculation of wheat and maize with a liquid formulation of Azospirillum brasilense in the Pampas, Argentina. In: Annual Meetings Abstracts, no. 4898. Madison, WA: CSSA, SSSSA.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Zorita, M., and M.V. Fernández-Canigia. 2009. Field performance of a liquid formulation of Azospirillum brasilense on dryland wheat productivity. European Journal of Soil Biology 45: 3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Zorita, M., and J.H. Grove. 2006. Wheat grain response to nitrogen fertilization and field inoculation with a liquid formulation of Azospirillum brasilense. In: Annual Meetings Abstracts, no. 4898. Madison, WI: CSSA, SSSSA.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbelaere, S., J. Vanderleyden, and Y. Okon. 2003. Plant growth-promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 22(2): 107–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Katatny, M.H. 2010. Enzyme production and nitrogen fixation by free, immobilized and coimmobilized inoculants of Trichoderma harzianum and Azospirillum brasilense and their possible role in growth promotion of tomato. Food Technology and Biotechnology 48(2): 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Katatny, M.H, A.M. Hetta, G.M. Shaban, and H.M. El-Komy. 2003. Improvement of cell wall degrading enzymes production by alginate encapsulated Trichoderma spp. Food Technology and Biotechnology 41: 219–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Katatny, M.S., H.M. El-Komy, and A.M. Attia. 1997. Pectin decomposition by mixed cultures of Azospirillum spp. and Penicillum corylophillum and its role in Azospirillum-host plant association, Microbioliological Research 152: 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Komy, H.M. A. 2005. Coimmobilization of Azospirillum lipoferum and Bacillus megaterium for successful phosphorus and nitrogen nutrition of wheat plants. Food Technology and Biotechnology 43: 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Komy, H.M. A., L.F. Vassyuk, and A.M. Abdel Wahab. 1993. Response of Zea mays varieties to inoculation with Azospirillum: Pot and field experiments, Nitrogen Fixation with Non-Legumes, The 6th International Symposium on Nitrogen Fixation with Non-Legumes, N.A. Hegazi, M. Fayez, M. Monib (Eds.), Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, pp. 477–478.
   Google Scholar
• Esitken, A., S. Ercisli, H. Karlidag, and F. Sahin. 2005. Potential use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in organic apricot production. In: Libek, A., Kaufmane, E., Sasnauskas, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Environmentally Friendly Fruit Growing, pp.90–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnè, S., L. Dehbi, D. Le Quéré, F. Cayer, J.-L. Morin, R. Lemay, and N. Fournier. 1993. Increase of greenhouse tomato fruit yields by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculated into the peatbased growing media. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25: 269–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, B., C. Patten, G. Holguin, and D. Penrose. 1999. Biochemical and Genetic Mechanisms used by Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria. London: Imperial College Press. pp. 267.
   Google Scholar
• Golterman, H.L., R.S. Clymo, and M.A. M. Ohnstad. 1978. Methods for Physical and Chemical Analysis of Fresh Waters. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp.153.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, K.A., and A.A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Willey and Sons, pp.680.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J.H., H.Y. Qi, Y.H. Guo, H.L. Ge, L.Y. Gong, L.X. Zhang, and P.H. Sun. 2004. Biocontrol of tomato wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biological Control 29: 66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G.E. 2000. Myths and dogmas of biocontrol changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Diseases 84: 377–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., and Y. Bashan. 2009. Ecology and application of Azospirillum and other plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB). European Journal of Soil Biology 45: 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janisiewicz, W.J. 1996. Ecological diversity, niche overlap, and coexistence of antagonist used in developing mixtures for biocontrol of postharvest diseases of apples. Biological Control 86 (5): 473–479.
   Google Scholar
• Kokalis-Burelle, N., C.S. Vavrina, E.V. Rosskopf, and R.A. Shelby. 2002. Field evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria amended transplant mixes and soil solarization for tomato and pepper production in Florida. Plant and Soil 238: 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek, C.P., G.E. Harman, and K.L. Ondik. 1998. Trichoderma & Gliocladium. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 393.
   Google Scholar
• Kurakov, A.V., I.S. Prokhorov, N.V. Kostina, E.G. Makhova, and V.S. Sadykova. 2006. Stimulation of nitrogen fixation in soddy-podzolic soils with fungi. Eurasian Soil Science 39: 968–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W., Y. Okon, and R.W. Hardy. 1983. Enhanced Mineral Uptake by Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor Roots Inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense. Applied Environmental Microbiology 45(6): 1775–1779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, K., G. Lafer, K. Schloffer, G. Innerhoffer, and H. Meister. 2003. Organic Fruit Growing. Wallingsford, UK: CAB International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marimuthu, S., P. Subbian, V. Ramamoorthy, and R. Samiyappan. 2002. Synergistic effect of combined application of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas fluorescence with inorganic fertilizer on root rot incidence and yield of cotton. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 109(6): 569–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehry, A., M. Akbar, and E. Giti. 2008. Colonization and nitrogenase activity of Triticum aestivum (cv. Baccross and Mahdavi) to the dual inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium meliloti plus 2,4-D. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 11(12): 1541–1550.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naseby, D.C., J.A. Pascual, and J.M. Lynch. 2000. Effect of biocontrol strains of Trichoderma on plant growth, Pythium ultimum populations, soil microbial communities and soil enzyme activities. Journal of Applied Microbiology 88: 161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezarat, S, and A. Gholami. 2009. Screening plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving seed germination, seedling growth and yield of maize. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 12(1): 26–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen, S.R., L.E. Sommers. 1982. Phosphorus. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, A.L. Page, R.H. Miller, D.R. Keeeny (Eds.), Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy pp. 403–430.
   Google Scholar
• Ousley, M.A., J.M. Lynch, and J.M. Whipps. 1993. Effect of Trichoderma on plant growth: A balance between inhibition and growth promotion. Microbial Ecology 26: 277–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikovskaya, R.I. 1948. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with the vital activity of some microbial species. Microbiologiya 17: 362–370.
   Google Scholar
• Ping, L., and W. Boland. 2004. Signals from underground: Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Trends in Plant Science 9: 263–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaudo, C.M., E.M. Krumpholz, F.D. Cassán, R. Bottini, M.L. Cantore, and J.A. Curá. 2006. Azospirillum sp. promotes root hair development in tomato plants through a mechanism that involves ethylene. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 24: 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosas, S.B., M. Rovera, J.A. Andrés, N.A. Pastor, L.B. Guinãzú, E. Carlier, G. Avanzini, and N.S. Correa. 2005. Characterization of Pseudomonas aurantiaca as biocontrol and PGPR agent. Endophytic properties. In: Sorvari, S., Toldi, O. (Eds.), Plant Microbe Interactions: Endophytes and Biocontrol Agents, Helsinki: Turku. pp. 91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Rovera, M., J. Andres, E. Carlier, C. Pasluosta, and S. Rosas, 2008. Pseudomonas aurantiaca: plant growth promoting traits, secondary metabolites and inoculation response. In: Ahmad, I., Pichtel, J., Hayat, S. (Eds.), Plant–Bacteria Interactions. Strategies and Techniques to Promote Plant Growth. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley–VCH, pp. 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Rudresh D.L., M.K. Shivaprakash, and R.D. Prasad. 2005. Tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities of Trichoderma spp. in relation to P uptake and growth and yield parameters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Canadian Journal of Microbiology 51: 217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, A., Y. Moenne-Loccoz, S. Fedi, P. Higgis, A. Fenton, D.N. Dowling, M. O’Reagen, and F. O’Gara. 1996. Improved delivery of biocontrol Pseudomonas and their antifungal metabolites using alginate polymers. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 44: 546–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saudibet, M.I., N. Fatta, A.J. Barneix. 2002. The effect of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on growth and nitrogen utilization by wheat plants. Plant and Soil 245: 215–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzenbech, G., and W. Biederman. 1948. Komplexone. x. erdalkali-komplex von 0,6-dioxyzofarbstoffen. Helvetica Chimica Acta 31: 678–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehata, M.M., and S.A. El-Khawas. 2003. Effect of two bio-fertilizers on growth parameters, yield characters, nitrogenous components, nucleic acids content, minerals, oil content, protein profiles and DNA banding pattern of sunflower yield. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 6(14): 1257–1268.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrand, J.J., N.R. Krieg, and J. Döbereiner. 1978. A taxonomic study of the Spirillum lipoferum group, with descriptions of a new genus, Azospirillum gen nov. and two species, Azospirillum lipoferum (Beijerinch) comb. nov. and Azospirillum brasilense sp. nov. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 24: 967–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, G.L., and A.H. Gibson. 1980. Measurements of nitrogen fixation by indirect means. In: Methods for Evaluating Biological Nitrogen Fixation, F.J. Bergerson (Ed.), Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. pp.111–138.
   Google Scholar
• Vassilev, N., M. Vassileva, R. Azcon, and A. Medina. 2001. Application of free and Ca-alginate entrapped Glomus deserticola and Yarowia lipolytica in soil-plant system. Journal of Biotechnology 91: 237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassilev, N., M. Toro, M. Vassileva, R. Azcon, and J.M. Barea. 1997. Rock phosphate solubilization by immobilized cells of Enterobacter sp. in fermentation and soil conditions. Bioresource Technology 61: 29–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whipps, J.M. 1997. Developments in the biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens. Advances in Botanical Research 26: 1–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whipps, J.M. 2001. Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 487–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, J., J.P. Verma, and K.N. Tiwari. 2011. Plant growth promoting activities of fungi and their effect on chickpea plant growth. Asian Journal of Biological Science 4: 291–299.
   Google Scholar
• Yedidia, I., A.K. Srivastva, Y. Kapulnik, and I. Chet. 2001. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on microelement concentrations and increased growth of cucumber plants. Plant and Soil 235: 235–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeilinger, S., B. Reithner, V. Scala, I. Peissl, M. Lorito, and R.L. Mach. 2005. Signal transduction by Tga3, a novel G protein α subunit of Trichoderma atroviride. Applied Environmental Microbiology 71: 1591–1597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zvyagintsev, D.G. 1991. Methods of Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, D.G. Zvyagintsev (Ed.), Moscow: Moscow University Press (in Russian).
   Google Scholar