Diagnosis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) nutrient imbalance by DRIS and CND-clr methods at two stages during early growth

References

• Bates, T. E. 1971. Factors affecting critical nutrient concentrations in plant and their evaluation. A review. Soil Science 112: 116–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaufils, E. R., and M. E. Sumner. 1976. Application of DRIS approach for calibrating soil, plant yield and plant quality factors of sugarcane. In: Proceedings of The South Africa Sugar Technologist' Association, June 1976, v.50, pp. 118–124. Mount Edgecombe, South Africa: South Africa Sugar Technologist' Association (SASTA).
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, M.-C., A. A. Viau, G. Samson, and M. Chamberland. 2005. Determination of a multivariate indicator of nitrogen imbalance (MINI) in potato using reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy. Agronomy Journal 97: 1515–1523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, W. 1992. Nutritional Disorders of Plants: Visual and Analytical Diagnosis. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Beverly, R. B. 1991. Calculating and interpreting DRIS index values. In: Plant Analysis Handbook, eds. J. B. Jones Jr., B. Wolf, and H. A. Mills, pp. 205–213. Athens, GA: Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Macías, F., R. Magallanes-Quintanar, R. D. Valdez-Cepeda, R. Vázquez-Alvarado, E. Olivares-Sáenz, E. Gutiérrez-Ornelas, J. A. Vidales-Contreras, and B. Murillo-Amador. 2010. Nutritional reference values for Opuntia ficus-indica determined by means of the boundary–line approach. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 173: 923–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz, K., B. Märländer, H. Puke, H. Glattkowski, and K. Thielecke. 1995. Neubewertung des technischen Wertes von Zuckerrüben [Revaluation of the technical value of sugar beet]. Zuckerindustry 120: 113–121.
   Google Scholar
• Cakmak, I. 2005. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 168: 521–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claupen, W. 1993. Nitrogen fertilization and chemical plant protection in a long-term field experiment and the yield response laws of Liebig, Liebscher, Wollny and Mitscherlich. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sciences 171: 102–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria, V. D. 2001. Nutrient interaction in crop plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 24: 1269–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2012. Available online at: http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx (accessed 17 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fotyma, M., and E. S. Dobers. 2008. Soil testing methods and fertilizer recommendations in Central-Eastern European countries. Fertilizers and Fertilization 30: 1–109.
   Google Scholar
• García-Hernández, J. L., R. D. Valdez-Cepeda, B. Murillo-Amador, F. A. Beltrán-Morales, F. H. Ruiz-Espinoza, I. Orona-Castillo, A. Flores-Hernández, and E. Troyo-Diéguez. 2006. Preliminary compositional nutrient diagnosis norms in Aloe vera L. grown on calcareous soil in an arid environment. Environmental and Experimental Botany 58: 244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzebisz, W., and J. Diatta. 2012. Constraints and Solutions to Maintain Soil Productivity: A Case Study from Central Europe. In: Soil Fertility Improvement and Integrated Nutrient Management - A Global Perspective, ed. J. Whalen, pp. 159–182. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Hallmark, W. B., C. J. Mooy, and J. Pesek. 1987. Comparison of two DRIS methods for diagnosing nutrient deficiencies. Journal of Fertilizer Issues 4: 151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneklaus, S., L. Knudsen, and E. Schnug. 1998. Relationship between potassium and sodium in sugar beet. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29: 1793–1798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hergert, G. W. 2010. Sugar Beet Fertilization Sugar Technology 12: 256–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Caraballo, E. A., O. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, and V. Rodríguez-Pérez. 2008. Evaluation of the Boltzmann equation as an alternative model in the selection of the high-yield subsample within the framework of the compositional nutrient diagnosis system. Environmental and Experimental Botany 64: 225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsinger, P. 2001. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant and Soil 237: 173–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, C. M., and B. Märländer. 2005. Composition of harmful nitrogen in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) – amino acids, betaine, nitrate – as affected by genotype and environment. European Journal of Agronomy 22: 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. B., Jr., and V. W. Case. 1990. Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples. In: Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, ed. R. L. Westerman, pp. 389–427. Madison, WI: SSSA.
   Google Scholar
• Jongman, R. H. G, R. G. H. Bunce, M. J. Metzger, C. A. Mücher, D. C. Hovard, and V. L. Mateus. 2006. Objectives and applications of a statistical environmental stratification of Europe. Landscape Ecology 21: 409–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenter, C., C. M. Hoffmann, and B. Märländer. 2006. Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy 24: 62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiari, L., L.-E. Parent, and N. Tremblay. 2001a. The phosphorus compositional nutrient diagnosis range for potato. Agronomy Journal 93: 815–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiari, L., L.-E. Parent, and N. Tremblay. 2001b. Critical compositional nutrient indexes for sweet corn at early growth stage. Agronomy Journal 93: 809–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiari, L., L.-E. Parent, and N. Tremblay. 2001c. Selecting the high-yield subbpopulation for diagnosing nutrient imbalance in crops. Agronomy Journal 93: 802–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P. S. S., S. A. Geetha, P. Savithri, P. P. Mahendran, and K. P. Ragunath. 2003. Evaluation of DRIS and CND indexes for effective nutrient management in Muscat grapevines (Vitis vinefera). Journal of Applied Horticulture 5: 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Magallanes-Quintanar, R., R. D. Valdez-Cepeda, E. Olivares-Sáenz, O. Pérez-Veyna, J. L. Garcia-Hernández, and J. D. López-Martinez. 2006. Compositional nutrient diagnosis in maize grown in a calcareous soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29: 2019–2033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malnou, C. S., K. W. Jaggard, and D. L. Sparkes. 2006. A canopy approach to nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for the sugar beet crop. European Journal of Agronomy 25: 254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Märländer, B., C. M. Hoffmann, H.-J. Koch, E. Ladewig, R. Merkes, J. Petersen, and N. Stockfisch. 2003. Environmental situation and yield performance of sugar beet crop in Germany: Heading for sustainable development. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189: 201–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, U. 2001. Growth Stages of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants. Berlin: BBCH Monograph.
   Google Scholar
• Milford, G.F.J., T.O. Pocock, K.W. Jaggard, P.V. Biscoe, M.J. Armstrong, P.J. Last, and P.J. Goodman. 1985. An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. IV. The expansion of the leaf canopy in relation to temperature and nitrogen. Annals of Applied Biology 107: 335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. A., and R. L. Anderson. 1977. Partitioning of soil test – crop response probability. In: Soil Testing: Correlating and Interpreting the Analytical Results, Special Publication 29, ed. M. Stelly, pp. 19–38. Madison, WI: ASA.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, L.-E. 2011. Diagnosis of the nutrient compositional space of fruit crops. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura (Jaboticabal – SP) 33: 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, L.-E., A. N. Cambouris, and A. Muhawenimana. 1994. Multivariate diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in potato crops. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58: 1432–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, L.-E., and M. Dafir, M.   1992. A theoretical concept of compositional nutrient diagnosis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 117: 239–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, S. É., L. E. Parent, D. E. Rozanne, A. Hernándes, and W. Natale. 2012. Nutrient balance as paradigm of plant and soil chemometrics. In: Soil Fertility, ed. R. Issaka, pp. 83–114. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, L.-E., M. Poirier, and M. Asselin. 1995. Multinutrient diagnosis of nitrogen status in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18: 1013–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesnel, P. O., B. Cote, J. W. Fyles, and A. D. Munson. 2006. Optimum nutrient concentrations and CND scores of mature white spruce determined using a boundary-line approach and spatial variation of tree growth and nutrition. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29: 1999–2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghupathi, H. B., B. M. C. Reddy, and K. Srinivas. 2002. Multivariate diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in banana. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 33: 2131–2143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sema, A., C. S. Maiti, A. K. Singh, and A. Bendangsengla. 2010. DRIS nutrient norms for pineapple on alfisols of India. Journal of Plant Nutrition 33: 1384–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra, A. P., M. E. Marchetti, A. C. T. Vitorino, J. O. Novelino, and M. A. Camacho. 2010. Development of DRIS and CND norms and evaluation of nutritional status of cotton. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 34: 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, J., S. D. Shikhamany, R. K. Singh, and H. B. Raghupathi. 2005. Diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in Thompson seedless grape grafted on Dog Ridge rootstock by DRIS. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36: 2823–2838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, G. G. C., J. C. L. Neves, V. H. Alvarez, and F. P. Leite. 2004. Nutritional diagnosis for eucalypt by DRIS, M-DRIS and CND. Scientia Agricola (Piracicaba, Brazil) 61: 507–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbarao, G. V., O. Ito, W. L. Berry, and R. M. Wheeler. 2003. Sodium – A functional plant nutrient. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 22: 391–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, M. E. 1979. Interpretation of foliar analyses for diagnostic purposes. Agronomy Journal 71: 343–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supit, I., C. van Diepen, A. J. W. de Wit, P. Kabat, B. Baruth, and F. Ludwig. 2010. Recent changes in the climatic yield potential of various crops in Europe. Agricultural Systems 103: 683–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, A., and F. J. Hills. 1990. Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing sugarbeet. In: Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, ed. R. L. Westerman, pp. 430–446. Madison, WI: SSSA.
   Google Scholar
• Wairegi L., and P. van Asten. 2011. Norms for multivariate diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in the East African Highland bananas (Musa spp. AAA). Journal of Plant Nutrition 34: 1453–1472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wairegi L. W. I., and P. J. A. van Asten. 2012. Norms for multivariate diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in Arabica and Robusta coffee in the East African highlands. Experimental Agriculture 48: 448–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeel, A., F. Abd-El-Motagally, D. Steffens, and S. Schubert. 2009. Sodium-induced calcium deficiency in sugar beet during substitution of potassium by sodium. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 172: 254–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walworth, J. L., and M. E. Sumner. 1987. The Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS). Advances in Soil Science 6: 149–188.
   Google Scholar
• Werker, A. R., and K. W. Jaggard. 1997. Modelling asymmetrical growth curves that rise and then fall: applications to foliage dynamics of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Annals of Botany 79: 657–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, M., M. Kryza, A. J. Dore, S. Hallsworth, and M. Błaś. 2011. Modelling emission, concentration and deposition of sodium for Poland. In: Proceedings of 14th Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, 2–6 October 2011, Kos, Greece, pp. 139–143. Roskilde, Denmark: Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar