Sugarcane by-products used as soil amendments on a sandy soil: Effects on sugarcane crop nutrition and yield

References

• Alexander, K. E. F.. 1972. Filter cake. South African Sugarcane Journal 56:71–7.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. M.. 1976. An ignition method for determination of phosphorus in lake sediments. Water Research 10:329–31. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(76)90175-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. L., and J. E. Bowen. 1990. Sugarcane nutrition. Atlanta, Georgia: Potash and Phosphatase Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, G. A., G. E. Rayment, A. J. Jeffrey, and A. M. Price. 2001. Changes in cane soil properties from applications of sugar mill by-products. Journal of Australian Proceedings of Sugar Cane Technologists 23:185–91
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C. and R. R. Weil. 2008. The nature and properties of soils. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bremner, J. M.. 1996. Nitrogen-total. In Methods of soil analysis, Part 3: Chemical properties, ed. Sparks,  , 1085–121. Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America Book Series no. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Bokhtiar, S. M. and K. Sakurai. 2005a. Effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on soil fertility and productivity of plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 51:325–44. doi:10.1080/03650340500098006.
   Google Scholar
• Bokhtiar, S. M. and K. Sakurai. 2005b. Integrated use of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on growth, yield, and quality of sugarcane in high Ganges river floodplain soils of Bangladesh. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36:1823–37 doi:10.1081/CSS-200062460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, B. N., K. I. Singh, A. Paland, and S. Maiti. 1979. Organic manure as a substitute for chemical fertilizers for high-yielding rice varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 49:188–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinloy, T. and R. F. Innes. 1953. An example of fractional replication in an experiment on sugarcane manuring. Journal of Agricultural Science 43:1–11. doi:10.1017/S0021859600044567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, B. M., R. J. Haynes, and J. H. Meyer. 2002. Sugar mill products can be important soil amendments. Proceedings of South African Sugarcane Technology Association 76:51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Elwali, A. M. O. and G. J. Gascho. 1984. Soil testing, foliar analysis, and DRIS as guides for sugarcane fertilization. Agronomy Journal 76:466–70. doi:10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600030024x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, R. A., D. R. Morris, C. R. Rainbolt, J. M. McCray, R. E. Perdomo, B. Eiland, P. Gerard, and G. Montes. 2008. Sugarcane response to mill mud, fertilizer, and soybean nutrient sources on a sandy soil. Agronomy Journal 100:845–54. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, J. M. and A. C. Long. 1971. Some factors affecting foliar analysis in sugarcane. Proceedings of South African Sugarcane Technology Association 48:217–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hochmuth, G., D. Maynard, C. Vavrina, E. Hanlon, and E. Simone. 2011. Plant tissue analysis and interpretation for vegetable crops in Florida. University of Florida Electronic Data Information Source (EDIS) Database, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ep081.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. D. 1994. Soil organic matter and available water capacity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49:189–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshua, W. D., D. L. Michalk, I. H. Curtis, M. Salt, and G. J. Osborne. 1998. The potential for contamination of soil and surface waters from sewage sludge (biosolids) in a sheep grazing study, Australia. Geoderma 135–56. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00125-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. J.. 2011. Impact of selected doses of organic wastes on physio-chemical characteristics of the soil and yield of wheat. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Applications 17:271–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., R. S. Malik, and I. S. Dahya. 1985. Influence of different organic wastes upon water retention, transmission and contact characteristics of a sandy soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 23:131–6. doi:10.1071/SR9850131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre, B. L.. 1992. The core/press method for predicting the sugar yield for use in cane payment. Sugarcane Journal 54:2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. C. and P. J. Stofella. 1997. Leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate from compost. Compost Science and Utilization 97:63–71. doi:10.1080/1065657X.1997.10701875.
   Google Scholar
• Matin, M. A., M. A. Hossain, and M. A. S. Miah. 1989. Tiller dynamics in sugarcane variety lsd-16. Bangladesh Journal of Sugarcane 11:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• McCray, J. M., S. Ji, G. Powell, G. Montes, R. Perdomo, and Y. Luo. 2009. Seasonal concentrations of leaf nutrients in Florida sugarcane. Sugar Cane International 27:17–24.
   Google Scholar
• McCray, J. M. and R. Mylavarapu. 2010. Sugarcane nutrient management using leaf analysis. University of Florida Electronic Data Information Source (EDIS) Database, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ag345.
   Google Scholar
• McCray, J. M., L. Baucum, K. Morgan, and S., Ji. 2011. Sugarcane leaf tissue sample preparation for diagnostic analysis. University of Florida Electronic Data Information Source (EDIS) Database, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/sc076.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, N.. 2010. Challenges and opportunities in leaf nutrient data interpretation. Proceedings of South African Sugarcane Technology Association 83:205–15.
   Google Scholar
• Moberly, P. K. and J. H. Meyer. 1978. Filter cake: a field and glasshouse evaluation. Proceedings of South African Sugarcane Technology Association 52:131–6.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. T., J. M. McCray, R. W. Rice, and L. E. Baucum. 2009. Review of current sugarcane fertilizer recommendations: A report from the UF/IFAS sugarcane fertilizer standards task force. University of Florida Electronic Data Information Source (EDIS) Database, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ss508.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D. R., R. A. Gilbert, C. R. Rainbolt, R. E. Perdomo, G. Powell, B. Eiland, and G. Montes. 2007. Soil organic matter and macronutrient levels after mill mud application to sugarcane growing in a sand soil. Proceeding of the 2007 American Society of Sugar Cane Technologist joint annual conference. Sugar Cane International 24:35–7.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, M.. 1976. Response of sugarcane to filter press mud and N, P, and K fertilizers: Effect on sugarcane yield and sucrose content. Agronomy Journal 68: 539–43. doi:10.2134/agronj1976.00021962006800040002x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, M. E., M. K. Wegener, and F. M. Mason. 2000. Mill mud case study in Mackay: An economic study recycling sugar by products for the Mackay region. CRC Sugar Occasional Publication. (CRC for Sustainable Sugar Production, Townsville), 17pp. Townsville, Australia: James Cook University. Available at: www.jcu.edu.au.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. R. and R. D. DeLaune. 2008. Biogeochemistry of wetlands: Science and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. W., R. A. Gilbert, and J. M. McCray. 2010. Nutritional requirements for Florida sugarcane. University of Florida Electronic Data Information Source (EDIS) Database, http://edis.ifas.edu/sc208.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. W., L. Baucum, and B. Glaz. 2012. Sugarcane variety consensus: Florida 2011. Sugarcane Journal 75:8–15.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. 2011. SAS Version 9.3. North Carolina, USA: SAS Inst., Cary.
   Google Scholar
• Solaimalai, A., M. Baskar, P. T. Ramesh, and N. Ravisankar. 2001. Utilisation of press mud as soil amendment and organic manure: A review. Agricultural Review 22:25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, T. K., K. P. Singh, and R. L. Yadav. 2012. Sugarcane productivity, soil health and dynamics in a bio-nutrition based multi-ratooning system under Indian sub-tropics. International Sugarcane Journal 114:584–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffella, P. J. and D. A. Graetz. 2000. Utilization of sugarcane compost as soil amendment in a tomato production system. Compost Science and Utilization 8:210–4. doi:10.1080/1065657X.2000.10701993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, M. E. and W. P. Miller. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In Methods of soil analysis, Part 3: chemical methods, ed. Sparks,  , 1201–30. Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America Book Series no. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. In Methods of soil analysis, Part 3: Chemical methods, ed. Sparks, 475–90. Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America Book Series no. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Yaduvanshi, N. S. and D. V. Yadav. 1990. Effects of sulphitation press mud and nitrogen fertilizer on biomass, nitrogen economy, and plant composition in sugarcane and on soil chemical properties. Journal of Agricultural Science 114:259–65. doi:10.1017/S0021859600072646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Z. He, P. J. Stofella, X. Yang, D. A. Graetz, and D. Morris. 2008. Leaching behavior of phosphorus in sandy soils amended with organic material. Soil Science 173:257–66. doi:10.1097/SS.0b013e31816d1edf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., B. Glaz, M. Irey, and C. Hu. 2015. Sugarcane genotype variation in leaf photosynthesis properties and yield as affected by mill mud application. Agronomy Journal 107:506–14. doi:10.2134/agronj14.0401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar