Formulation of humic substances coated fertilizer and its use to enhance K fertilizer use efficiency for tomato under greenhouse conditions

References

• Azeem, B., K.Kushaari, Z. B.Man, A.Basit, and T. H.Thanh. 2014. Review on materials & methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. Journal of Controlled Release 181:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adani, F., P.Genevini, P.Zaccheo, and G.Zocchi. 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition. Journal of Plant Nutrition 21 (3):561–75. doi: 10.1080/01904169809365424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzal, I., F.Munir, C. M.Ayub, S. M. A.Basra, A.Hameed, and F.Shah. 2013. Ethanol priming: an effective approach to enhance germination and seedling development by improving ant-oxidant system in tomato seeds. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Cultus 12:129–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar, M. E., M. Z.Khan, M.Tahir Rashid, and Z.Ahsan. 2010. Effect of potash on yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M.). Pakistan Journal of Botany 42:1695–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidari, B. I., and N. S.Hebsur. 2011. Potassium in relation to yield and quality of selected vegetable crops. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24:55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and T.Aviad. 1990. Effect of humic substances on plant growth. In Humic substances in soil and crop science, ed. P. McCarthy, C. E.Clapp, R. L. Malcom, and P. R. Baloom, 161–86, Vol. 18. Madison: Soil Science Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., M.De Nobili, and T.Aviad. 2004. Stimulatory effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture, eds. F. Magdoff and R. Weil, 131–65. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, S., L. Prochnow, and H. Cantarella. 2009. Recent developments of fertilizer production and use to improve nutrient efficiency and minimize environmental impacts. Advances in Agronomy 102:267–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. P., P. V.Nelson, and D. C.Sanders. 1994. A humic acid improves growth of tomato seedling in solution culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition 17 (1):173–84. doi: 10.1080/01904169409364717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, M., R.Ghisi, S.Nardi, and C.Passera. 1991. Effect of humic substances on photosynthetic sulphate assimilation in maize seedlings. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 71 (2):239–42. doi: 10.4141/cjss91-023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, M., M. Liu, F. Zhan, and L. Wu. 2005. Preparation and properties of a slow-release membrane-encapsulated urea fertilizer with superabsorbent and moisture preservation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 44:4206–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartz, T. K., G.Miyao, R. J. Mullen, M. D.Cahn, J.Valencia, and K. L.Brittan. 1999. Potassium requirements for maximum yield and fruit quality of processing tomato. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 124:199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie, C., C.Jing-Zhang, T.Man-Zhi, and G.Zi-Tong. 2002. Soil degradation: A global problem endangering sustainable development. Journal of Geographical Sciences 12 (2):243–52. doi: 10.1007/BF02837480.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. Z., M. E.Akhtar, S.Ahmad, A.Khan, and R. U.Khan. 2014. Chemical composition of lignitic humic acid and evaluating its positive impacts on nutrient uptake, growth and yield of maize. Pakistan Journal of Chemistry 4 (1):19–25. doi: 10.15228/2014.v04.i01.p04.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, R. U., M. Z.Khan, A.Khan, S.Saba, F.Hussain, and I. U.Jan. 2018. Effect of humic acid on growth and crop nutrient status of wheat on two different soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition 41 (4):453–60. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2017.1385807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khristeva, L. A., A. M.Gallushko, A. I.Gorovaya, A. A.Kolbassin, L. P.Shortshoi, L. K. Tkatshenko, L. W.Fot, and N. V.Luk’Yakenko. 1980. The main aspects of using physiologically active substances of humus nature. Minnesota: VI International Peat Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, R., M.Liu, and L.Wu. 2007. Controlled release NPK compound fertilizer with the function of water retention. Reactive and Functional Polymers 67 (9):769–79. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., R.Liang, F.Zhan, Z.Liu, and A.Niu. 2007. Preparation of superabsorbent slow release nitrogen fertilizer by inverse suspension polymerization. Polymer International 56 (6):729–37. doi: 10.1002/pi.2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschner, H. 1995. Functions of mineral nutrients: macronutrients. In: Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd ed., ed. H. Marschner,299–312. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merlo, L., R.Ghisi, N.Rascio, and C.Passera. 1991. Effects of humic substances on carbohydrate metabolism of maize leaves. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71 (2):419–25. doi: 10.4141/cjps91-058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruck, J. A. 1961. Chemical methods for analysis of fruits and vegetables. 1154 ed. Canada: Research Station Summerland, Research Branch Canada, Dept. Agri.
   Google Scholar
• Samidova, M. 1960. The influence of humus acid on the respiration of plant roots. Biologia Plantarum 2:152–64.
   Google Scholar
• Schuch, W., and C.Bird. 1994. Improving tomato fruit quality using bioscience. Acta Horticulturae (Horticulture) 37:75–80. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.376.7.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviv, A. 2005. Controlled release fertilizers, IFA International Workshop on Enhanced-Efficiency Fertilizers, Frankfurt. Paris, France: International Fertilizer Industry Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sladky, Z. 1959. The effect of extracted humus substances on growth of tomato plants. Biologia Plantarum 1:142–50.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H., and A.Binger. 1986. The effect of humic acid on aluminum toxicity in corn plants. Soil Science 141 (1):20–25. doi: 10.1097/00010694-198601000-00004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunzen, M. H., H.Sari, and M.Soylak. 2004. Microwave digestion procedure for atomic absorption spectrophotometer determination of trace metal contents of sediment samples. Analytical Letters 37:1949–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varis, S., and R. A. T.George. 1985. The influence of mineral nutrition on fruit yield, seed yield, and quality in tomato. Journal of Horticultural Sciences 60(3):373–76. doi: 10.1080/14620316.1985.11515641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, D., R. E. Malcom, and B. G. Ord. 1985. Influence of humic substances on biochemical processes in plants. In Soil organic matter and biological activities, eds. D. Vaughan and R. E. Macom, 77–108. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus. Ninhoff/Junk. W.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, S. A. 1987. Effect of humic substances on mitochondrial respiration and oxidative phosphorylation. The Science of the Total Environment 62:347–54. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(87)90521-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkleman, E., R.Amin, W. A.Rice, and M. B.Tahir. 1990. Methods manual soil laboratory. Islamabad, Pakistan: BARD, PARC.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L., and M.Liu. 2008. Preparation and properties of chitosan-coated NPK compound fertilizer with controlled-release and water-retention. Carbohydrate Polymers 72(2):240–47. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildrim, E. 2007. Foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid affect productivity and quality of tomato. Acta Agricultureae, Scandinavica Section B: Soil Plant Science 57:182–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar