Cycocel, iron and zinc effects on yield and physiological characteristics of wheat under drought stress conditions

References

• Abbasi, N., J. Cheraghi, and S. Hajinia. 2019. Effect of iron and zinc micronutrients foliar application as nano and chemical on physiological traits and grain yield of two bread wheat cultivars. Crop Physiology Journal 11 (43):85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, A., M. Joudi, and M. Janmohammadi. 2009. Late defoliation and wheat yield: Little evidence of postanthesis source limitation. Field Crops Research 113 (1):90–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar, S., F. M. Anjum, and M. A. Anjum. 2011. Micronutrient fortification of wheat flour: Recent development and strategies. Food Research International 44 (3):652–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ajlouni, Z., A. Al-Abdallat, A. Al-Ghzawi, J. Ayad, J. Abu Elenein, N. Al-Quraan, and P. Baenziger. 2016. Impact of Pre-Anthesis Water Deficit on Yield and Yield Components in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Plants Grown under Controlled Conditions. Agronomy 6 (2):33.doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy6020033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, B. J. 2008. Zinc in soils and crop nutrition. 2nd ed. Brussels, Belgium and Paris, France: IZA and IFA.
   Google Scholar
• Briat, J. F., C. Dubos, and F. Gaymard. 2015. Iron nutrition, biomass production, and plant product quality. Trends in Plant Science 20 (1):33–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coventry, D. R., R. K. Gupta, A. Yadav, R. S. Poswal, R. S. Chhokar, R. K. Sharma, V. K. Yadav, S. C. Gill, A. Kumar, A. Mehta, et al. 2011. Wheat quality and productivity as affected by varieties and sowing time in Haryana, India. Field Crops Research 123 (3):214–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewal, G. S., and R. G. Pareek. 2004. Effect of phosphorus, sulfur and zinc on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 49 (3):160–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emam, Y. 2011. Cereal crop production. Shiraz: Shiraz University Press. (In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Emam, Y., and M. N. Ilkaie. 2002. Effects of planting density and chlormequat chloride (CCC) on morphological characteristic and grain yield of winter oilseed rape cv. Talayeh. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 4 (1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Emam, Y., and G. R. Moaied. 2000. Effect of planting density and chlormequat chloride on morphological and physiological characteristics of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivar "Valfajr. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2:75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Guarienti, E. M., C. F. Ciacco, G. R. Cunha, R. D. Gilberto, J. A. Leo, and C. M. O. Camargo. 2003. Evaluation of the effect of climate variables on industrial wheat quality and on grain yield using principal component analysis. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 23 (3):500–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612003000300034.
   Google Scholar
• Hemantaranjan, A., and O. K. Garg. 1988. Iron and zinc fertilization with reference to the grain quality of Triticum aestivum L. Journal of Plant Nutrition 11 (6–11):1439–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904168809363900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. A., and H. Kandil. 2007. Growth, yield and chemical constituents of soybean (Glycine max L.) plants as affect by plant spacing under different irrigation intervals. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science 3 (6):657–63.
   Google Scholar
• Khalilzadeh, R., R. S. Sharifi, and J. Jalilian. 2016. Antioxidant status and physiological responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to cycocel application and biofertilizers under water limitation condition. Journal of Plant Interactions 11 (1):130–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2016.1221150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibangsa, S., M. Thangaraj, and R. Stephen. 2000. Effect of brassinosteriod and salicylic acid on rice grown under low irradiance condition. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 34:258–60.
   Google Scholar
• Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 25 (2):239–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahlavan-Rad, M. R., and M. Pesarakli. 2009. Response of wheat plants to zinc, iron, and manganese applications and uptake and concentration of zinc, iron, and manganese in wheat grains. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 40:1322–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620902761262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, N., G. C. Pathak, and C. P. Sharma. 2006. Zinc is critically required for pollen function and fertilisation in lentil. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 20 (2):89–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2005.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., and P. Peltonen-Sainio. 2001. Plant growth regulator effects on spring cereal root and shoot growth. AgronomyJournal 93:936–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.934936x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A. 2003. Plant growth regulators to manipulate cereal growth in northern growing conditions. Dissertation, Department of Applied Biology, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Ravi, S., H. T. Channal, N. S. Hebsur, B. N. Patil, and P. R. Dharmatti. 2008. Effect of sulfur, zinc and iron nutrition on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and quality of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L. ). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 21 (3):382–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. M., M. Baghour, and L. Romero. 2000. Efficiency of the different genotypes of tomato in relation to foliar content of Fe and the response of some bioindicators. Journal of Plant Nutrition 23 (11–12):1777–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160009382141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahsavari, N., H. M. Jais, and A. H. Shirani Rad. 2014. Responses of Canola Morphological and Agronomic Characteristics to Zeolite and Zinc Fertilization under Drought Stress. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 45 (13):1813–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.875207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahsavari, N. 2019. Effects of zeolite and zinc on quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under late-season drought stress. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 50 (9):1117–22. https://. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2019.1604729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekoofa, A., and Y. Emam. 2008. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and plant growth regulators (PGRs) on yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cv Shiraz. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 10:101–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalooth, A. T., M. M. Tawfik, and H. M. Mohamed. 2006. A comparative study on the effect of foliar application of zinc, potassium and magnesium on growth, yield and some chemical constituents of mungbean plants growth under Water stress conditions. World Journal of Agricultural Science 2 (1):37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, C., C. A. S. Hall, and H. Wang. 2003. Land-use change in rice, wheat and maize production in China (1961–1998). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 95 (2–3):523–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00182-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., H. Li, F. Liu, and L. Xiao. 2009. Chlorocholine chloride application effects on photosynthetic capacity and photoassimilates partitioning in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Scientia Horticulturae 119 (2):113–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, E. N., and C. G. Chambliss. 2005. Fertilization of field and forage crop. Reno, NV: Nevada State University Publication, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Zandipour, E., H. Ajam Norozei, and A. Bostani. 2018. Effect of zinc and iron foliar application with two levels of irrigation water acidity on the quantitative and qualitative parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 16 (3):3097–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1603_30973112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar