Effects of different fertilizers on some soil enzymes activity and chlorophyll contents of two cotton (G. hirsutum L.) varieties grown in a saline and non-saline soil

References

• Agrawal, K. M. L., and O. P. Bahl. 1968. Glucosidase of Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Biological Chemistry 243 (1):103–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)99330-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albiach, R., R. Canet, F. Pomares, and F. Ingelmo. 2000. Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after the application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil. Bioresource Technology 75 (1):43–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00030-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allakhverdiev, S. I., A. Sakamoto, Y. Nishiyama, M. Inaba, and N. Murata. 2000. Ionic and osmotic effects of NaCl-induced inactivation of photosystems I and II in Synechococcus sp. Plant Physiology 123 (3):1047–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.123.3.1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, F. E. 1973. Soil organic matter and its role in crop production. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2020. TÜİK, 2020. Import–Export TUIK January–September Period.
   Google Scholar
• Alamgir, A. N. M., and M. Y. Ali. 1999. Effect of salinity on leaf pigments, sugar and protein concentrations and chloroplast ATPase activity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Bangladesh. Journal of Botany 28 (2):145–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwat, M. A., B. K. Rajkumar, P. R. Parmar, and H. R. Ramani. 2020. Physiological characterization of cotton genotypes (Gossypium herbaceum L.) for salinity at seedling stage. IJCS 8 (2):2306–12.
   Google Scholar
• Brassard, P., S. Godbout, J. H. Palacios, T. Jeanne, R. Hogue, P. Dubé, L. Limousy, and V. Raghavan. 2018. Effect of six engineered biochars on GHG emissions from two agricultural soils: A short-term incubation study. Geoderma 327:73–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boguslawski, G., J. M. Akagi, and L. G. Ward. 1976. Possible role for cysteine biosynthesis in conversion from mycelial to yeast form of Histoplasma capsulatum. Nature 261 (5558):336–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/261336a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, R. G. 1976. Proc. B.C.P.C. Symp. Persistence of Insecticidea and Herbiddes, vol. 889. England: University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Camina, F., C. Trasar-Cepeda, F. Gil-Sotres, and C. Leirós. 1998. Measurement of dehydrogenase activity in acid soils rich in organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 30 (8–9):1005–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00010-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, N., and J. Dever. 2011. A hydroponic approach to evaluate responses to salinity stress in cotton (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Dissertation). Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. J. 1997. Barley straw decomposition and immobilization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29 (2):109–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00001-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, S. P., and M. A. Tabatabai. 1997. Effect of tillage and residue management on enzyme activities in soils: III. Phosphatases and arylsulfatase. Biology and Fertility of Soils 24 (2):141–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, R. P., D. D. Myrold, and E. A. Kerle. 1988. Microbial biomass and soil enzyme activities in compacted and rehabilitated skid trail soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52 (2):512–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200020038x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, W. A., and M. A. Tabatabai. 1993. Significance and potential uses of soil enzymes. In: Soil microbial ecology, ed. F. M. Metting Jr., 95–127. New York: Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Doğru, A., and S. Canavar. 2019. Physiological and biochemical components of salt tolerance in plants. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science 8 (1):155–74.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, E. 1980. Responses of plants to saline environments. In Genetic engineering of osmoregulation, 7–21. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ergene, A. 1982. Soil science. Erzurum: Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture Publications. No: 267, Textbooks Series No: 42.
   Google Scholar
• Eivazi, F., and M. A. Tabatabai. 1988. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 20 (5):601–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(88)90141-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauci, M. F., and R. P. Dick. 1994. Microbial biomass as an indicator of soil quality: effects of long-term management and recent soil amendments. Soil Science Society of America 17:229–34.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, T. J., and T. D. Colmer. 2008. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist 179 (4):945–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger, W. T. J., and D. A. Dick. 1983. Relationships between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 47 (5):945–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700050021x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Y., P. Wang, and C. H. Kong. 2009. Urease, invertase, dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities in paddy soil influenced by allelopathic rice variety. European Journal of Soil Biology 45 (5–6):436–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, M. B., J. A. Carreira, R. García-Ruíz, and R. P. Dick. 2004. Soil moisture pre-treatment effects on enzyme activities as indicators of heavy metal-contaminated and reclaimed soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36 (10):1559–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemphill, J. K., H. Basal, and W. C. Smith. 2005. Screening method for salt tolerance in cotton. American Journal of Plant Physiology 1 (1):107–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpp.2006.107.112.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, G. L., and F. G. Viets. 1969. Nitrogen enrichment of surface water by absorption of ammonia volatilized from cattle feedlots. Science (New York, NY) 166 (3904):514–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.166.3904.514.
   Google Scholar
• Juma, N. G., and M. A. Tabatabai. 1977. Effects of trace elements on phosphatase activity in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41 (2):343–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100020034x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, B., and D. L. F. Filippis. 1999. Physiological and oxidative response to NaCl of the salt tolerant Grevillea ilicifolia and the salt sensitive Grevillea arenaria. Journal of Plant Physiology 155 (6):746–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80092-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. W. 1970. Enzymatic activity in a gray wooded soil as influenced by cropping systems and fertilizers. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2 (2):137–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(70)90016-7.
   Google Scholar
• Khavari-Nejad, R. A., and Y. Mostofi. 1998. Effects of NaCl on photosynthetic pigments, saccharides, and chloroplast ultrastructure in leaves of tomato cultivars. Photosynthetica 35 (1):151–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006846504261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, S., M. Dragan-Bularda, and D. Radulescu. 1975. Biological significance of enzymes accumulated in soil. Advantages of Argon (27):25–87.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, K., and G. N. Johnson. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51 (345):659–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/51.345.659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsuya, S., Y. Takeoka, and H. Miyake. 2000. Effects of sodium chloride on foliar ultrastructure of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.) plantlets grown under light and dark conditions in vitro. Journal of Plant Physiology 157 (6):661–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80009-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. L., T. Hernandez, and C. Garcia. 1999. Effects of a cadmium-contaminated sewage sludge compost on dynamics of organic matter and microbial activity in an arid soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 28 (3):230–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munns, R., and M. Tester. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59:651–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nannipieri, P., L. Muccini, and C. Ciardi. 1983. Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: production and persistence. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 15 (6):679–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(83)90032-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perucci, P. 1990. Effect of the addition of municipal solid-waste compost on microbial biomass and enzyme activities in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 10:221–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. R., V. G. Kakani, D. Zhao, S. Koti, and W. Gao. 2004. Interactive effects of ultraviolet-B radiation and temperature on cotton physiology, growth, development and hyperspectral reflectance. Photochemistry and Photobiology 79 (5):416–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1562/2003-11-19-ra.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinertsen, S. A., L. F. Elliott, V. L. Cochran, and G. S. Campbell. 1984. Role of carbon and nitrogen in determining the rate of wheat straw decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 16 (5):459–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(84)90052-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D. J. 1971. Some factors influencing the estimation of dehydrogenase activities of some soils under pasture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 3 (2):97–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(71)90002-2.
   Google Scholar
• Rowell, M. J., J. N. Ladd, and E. A. Paul. 1973. Enzymatically active complexes of proteases and humic and analogues. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 5 (5):699–703. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(73)90062-X.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, S., L. E. Sánchez, J. Alvarez, A. Valverde, P. Galindo, J. M. Igual, A. Peix, and I. Santa-Regina. 2011. Correlation among soil enzyme activities under different forest system management practices. Ecological Engineering 37 (8):1123–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvucci, M. E., and S. J. Crafts‐Brandner. 2004. Inhibition of photosynthesis by heat stress: the activation state of Rubisco as a limiting factor in photosynthesis. Physiologia Plantarum 120 (2):179–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.0173.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G., and M. Sr. Laskowski. 1961. Phosphatase ester cleavage (survey). In The enzymes,eds. P. D. Boyer, H. Lardy, and K. Myrback, 2nd ed., 3–35. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P., S. Mitra, D. Majumdar, P. Bhattacharyya, A. Prakash, P. Borah, A. Paul, and L. Rangan. 2017. Nutrient and enzyme mobilization in earthworm casts: a comparative study with addition of selective amendments in undisturbed and agricultural soils of a mountain ecosystem. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 119:437–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar, A., and R. K. Gupta. 2020. Site-specific fertilizer nitrogen management in Bt cotton using chlorophyll meter. Experimental Agriculture 56 (3):1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479720000046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skujins, J. 1976. Dehydrogenase: an indicator of biological activities in soils. Bulletin Ecological Research Community NFR Status Naturvetensk, Forskningsrad 17:235–41.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X., G. Pan, C. Zhang, L. Zhang, and H. Wang. 2016. Effects of biochar application on fluxes of three biogenic greenhouse gases: a meta-analysis. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 2 (2):e01202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1202.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai, M. A., and J. M. Bremner. 1969. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activıty. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1 (4):301–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai, M. A., and J. M. Bremner. 1972. Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 4 (4):479–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(72)90064-8.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai, M. A. 1982. Soil enzymes. In: Soil enzymes activities. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties,eds. A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney, 903–48. Madison, WI: Agronomy No. 9. ASA and SSSA.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, S. C., B. K. Tiwari, and R. Mishra. 1989. Microbial community enzyme activity and CO2 evaluation in Pineapple orchard soil. Tropical Ecology 30 (2):265–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wlodarczyk, T., W. Steçpniewski, and M. Brzezinska. 2002. Dehydrogenase activity, redox potential, and emissions of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide from Cambisols under flooding conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 36:200–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, S. A. 1996. Salinity tolerance of ornamental trees and shrubs. Canada: Food and Rural Development and Agriculture and Agrifood.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, B. C., and D. X. Yue. 2012. Soil microbial and enzymatic activities across a chronosequence of Chinese pine plantation development on the loess plateau of China. Pedosphere 22 (1):1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60186-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zantua, M. I., L. C. Dumenil, and J. M. Bremner. 1977. Relationships between soil urease activity and other soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41 (2):350–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100020036x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. K. 2001. Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science 6 (2):66–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01838-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar