Widespread nutritional imbalances of coffee plantations

References

• Alvarez, V. V. H., and R. A. Leite. 1999. Statistical foundations of the formulas used to calculate nutrient indices in the integrated diagnosis and recommendation system. DRIS Newsletter of Brazilian Society of Soil Science 24 (1):20–4.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, P. A., C. T. T. Machado, and M. S. Fernandes. 2006. Phosphorus. In Mineral nutrition of plants, 253–98. Viçosa, MG: Brazilian Society of Soil Science.
   Google Scholar
• Beaufils, E. R. 1973. Diagnosis and Recomendation Integrated System (DRIS). In A general scheme for experimentation and calibration based on principles developed from research in plant nutrition. Pietermeritzburg: University of Natal.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla, I., J. Abadía, L. Bolanos, M. Pestana, H. E. P. Martinez, J. J. Lucena, and I. Bonilla. 2021. Introduction to the plant′s nutrition: Mineral elements. In Mineral nutrition of plants, 58–80. Viçosa, MG: UFV.
   Google Scholar
• Bragança, S. M., L. C. Prezotti, J. A. Lani, R. G. Ferrão, A. F. A. da Fonseca, M. A. G. Ferrão, and L. H. d. Muner. 2017. Nutrition of Conilon coffee. In Conilon coffee. 2nd ed., 327–43. Vitória: Incaper.
   Google Scholar
• Farnezi, M. M. M., E. D. B. Silva, and P. T. G. Guimarães. 2009. Nutritional diagnosis of coffee plantations in the Upper Jequitinhonha Valley, Minas Gerais State, Brazil: DRIS norms and critical nutrient ranges. Brazilian Journal of Soil Science 33:969–78.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, A., J. Lima, and S. Silva. 2018. Use of the integrated diagnosis and recommendation system and Sufficiency band for nutritional status of Conilon coffee. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 22 (2):1–7. doi: 10.9734/JEAI/2018/40559.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, A., J. Lima, S. D. A. Silva, A. C. Xavier, and A. P. D. Neto. 2015. Spatial variability of the productivity and the nutritional condition of Coffee canephora. Coffee Science 10 (4):420–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, W. R., W. P. Rodrigues, H. D. Vieira, M. G. Oliveira, J. R. M. Dias, and F. L. Partelli. 2016. Genetic diversity of standard leaf nutrients in Coffea canephora genotypes during phenological phases. Genetics and Molecular Research 15 (4):1–13. doi: 10.4238/gmr.15048839.
   Google Scholar
• Lana, R. M. Q., S. A. D. Oliveira, Â. M. Q. Lana, and M. V. D. Faria. 2010. Coffea arabica L. nutritional status survey based on DRIS, in the Upper Paranaíba region - Minas Gerais. Brazilian Journal of Soil Science 34:1147–56.
   Google Scholar
• Maia, C. E., and E. R. C. Morais. 2016. Boundary line model to estimate the nutrient sufficiency range in muskmelon leaves. Brazilian Journal of Soil Science 40: E016003.
   Google Scholar
• Malavolta, E., G. C. Vitti, and S. A. Oliveira. 1997. Assessment of the nutritional status of plants: Principles and applications. 2 ed., 319. Piracicaba: Brazilian Association of Potash and Phosphorus.
   Google Scholar
• Mantovani, J. P. M., J. C. Calonego, and J. S. S. Foloni. 2013. Boron leaf application at different growth stages of peanut. Revista Ceres 60 (2):270–8. doi: 10.1590/S0034-737X2013000200017.
   Google Scholar
• Marschner, H. 2012. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, H. E. P., J. J. Lucena, and I. Bonilla. 2021. Soil-Plant Relationships: Basis for plant nutrition and production, 307 p. Viçosa: Editora UFV.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, H. E. P., J. F. S. Menezes, R. B. D. Souza, V. H. Alvarez Venegas, and P. T. G. Guimarães. 2003. Critical nutrient ranges and evaluation of nutritional status in coffee-tree plantations of Minas Gerais. Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Research 38:703–13.
   Google Scholar
• Montalvo, D., F. Degryse, R. C. da Silva, and R. Baird. 2016. Agronomic Effectiveness of zinc Sources as micronutrient fertilizer. Advances in Agronomy 139:215–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Supply Company – CONAB. 2020. Monitoring Brazilian crop: Coffee. Accessed January 29.
   Google Scholar
• National Supply Company – CONAB. 2022. Monitoring Brazilian crop: Coffee. Accessed January 25.
   Google Scholar
• Partelli, F. L., J. R. M. Dias, H. D. Vieira, P. G. S. Wadt, and E. Paiva Júnior. 2014. Nutritional assessment of the irrigated common bean crop by the CND, DRIS, and sufficiency range methods. Brazilian Journal of Soil Science 38 (3):858–66.
   Google Scholar
• Poltronieri, Y., H. E. P. Martinez, J. M. Clemente, and A. O. Ferreira. 2017. Boron, copper and zinc supply by insertion tablets in the coffee orthotropic stem. Coffee Science 11:521–9.
   Google Scholar
• Prado, R. M. 2020. Plant′s nutrition, 414 p. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.
   Google Scholar
• Reis Júnior, R. A., and P. H. Monnerat. 2003. Norms establishment of the Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) for nutritional diagnosis of sugarcane. Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Research 38:277–82.
   Google Scholar
• Serra, A. P., M. E. Marchetti, A. C. T. Vitorino, J. O. Novelino, and M. A. Camacho. 2010. Determination of normal nutrient ranges for cotton by the ChM, CND and DRIS methods. Brazilian Journal of Soil Science 34:105–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sfredo, G. J., and A. F. Lantmann. 2007. Nutrient sulfur needed for greater soybean yields. Embrapa Soybean, Technical Circular, Londrina – PR.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, R. A., J. E. Creste, C. S. Tiritan, W. E. X. Guerra, and A. E. A. Ecker. 2015. Nutritional diagnosis by DRIS method of the cultivars coffee in the northern region of Paraná, Brazil. Coffee Science 10 (2):204–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sistema CNA/SENAR. 2022. Grains cost. Accessed January 25. https://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/upload/revista/pdf/0845987001639146208.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wadt, P. G. S., and Dias, J. R. M. 2012. Regional and inter-regional DRIS norms for nutritional evaluation of Conilon coffee. Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Research 47:822–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wadt, P. G. S., R. F. Novais, V. H. Alvarez, S. Fonseca, and N. F. Barros. 1998. Reference values of macronutrients in eucalypt determined by DRIS and mathematical chance methods. Brazilian Journal of Soil Science 22:685–92.
   Google Scholar