Nutrient accumulations and efficiencies for maximum blackberry fruit production

References

• Bassols, M. do C., and J. N. Moore. 1980. A cultura da amora-preta,11. Pelotas: EMBRAPA-UEPAE Cascata.
   Google Scholar
• Braga Neto, A. M., E. B. Silva, M. C. M. Cruz, P. Lage, E. D. Gonçalves, L. F. O. Silva, R. C. Lima, and V. K. S. Santos. 2019. Response of physalis ('Physalis peruviana’ L.) to liming in acidic soils. Australian Journal of Crop Science 13 (12): 2038–45. doi: 10.21475/ajcs.19.13.12.p2058.
   Google Scholar
• Briat, J. F., C. Dubos, and F. Gaymard. 2015. Iron nutrition, biomass production, and plant product quality. Trends in Plant Science 20 (1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, D. M. M., W. A. Cardona, M. C. G. Muñoz, and M. M. B. Benavides. 2019. Relationship between variable doses of N, P, K and Ca and the physicochemical and proximal characteristics of Andean blackberry (Rubus glaucus Benth.). Scientia Horticulturae 256:108528. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos, H.G, P. K. T. Jacomine, L. H. C. Dos. Anjos, V. Á. De. Oliveira, J. F. Lumbreras, M. R. Coelho, J. A. de Almeida, J. C. de Araújo Filho, J. B. Oliveira, T. J. F. Cunha, et al. 2018. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos, 5. ed. rev. e ampl, 356. Brasília: Embrapa.
   Google Scholar
• Dresler, S., W. Bednarek, P. Tkaczyk, and B. Hawrylak-Nowak. 2015. Estimation of the macro and micronutrient status of raspberries grown in the Lublin region. Folia Horticulturae 27 (1):53–62. doi: 10.1515/fhort-2015-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Salvador, J., B. C. Strik, and D. R. Bryla. 2015. Response of blackberry cultivars to fertilizer source during establishment in an organic fresh market production system. HortTechnology 25 (3):277–92. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.25.3.277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontoura, S. M. V., O. H. C. Pias, T. Tiecher, M. R. Cherubin, R. P. Moraes, and C. Bayer. 2019. Effect of gypsum rates and lime with different reactivity on soil acidity and crop grain yields in a subtropical Oxisol under no-tillage. Soil and Tillage Research 193:27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, C. J. d. S. 2007. Nutrição e adubação. In Cultivo da amoreira-preta, ed. L. E. C. Antunes and M. do C. B. Raseira, 45–54. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado. (Sistemas de Produção, 12).
   Google Scholar
• Gaurat, J. O., E. B. Silva, M. C. M. Cruz, and J. E. Lima. 2023. Foliar sampling time and critical level diagnosis of nutrients for blackberry. Journal of Plant Nutrition 46:1108–19. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2022.2067769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerloff, G. C., and W. H. Gabelman. 1983. Genetic basis of inorganic plant nutrition. In Inorganic plant nutrition. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, eds. A. Laüchli, and R. L. Bielesk, 453–86. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam, F. S., J. D. May, and M. B. Adams. 2018. Response of foliar nutrients of Rubus allegheniensis to nutrient amendments in a central Appalachian hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management 411:101–7. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulding, K. W. T. 2016. Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use and Management 32 (3):390–9. doi: 10.1111/sum.12270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, H. K., and R. C. Funt. 2017. Blackberries and their Hybrids. Crop Production Science in Horticulture, Vol. 17. Wallingford: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, E. M. C., and L. F. A. Pérez. 2020. Effect of the liming on the soil chemical properties and the development of tomato crop in Sucre-Colombia. Journal of Applied Biotechnology and Bioengineering 7 (2):87–93. doi: 10.15406/jabb.2020.07.00220.
   Google Scholar
• Horuz, A., A. Korkmaz, M. Dizman, M, and Turan, M. 2013. The evaluation of leaf nutrient contents and element ratios of different raspberry varieties. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 11:588–93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273630603_The_evaluation_of_leaf_nutrient_contents_and_element_ratios_of_different_raspberry_varieties
   Google Scholar
• Khoshgoftarmanesh, A. H., R. Schulin, R. L. Chaney, B. Daneshbakhsh, and M. Afyuni. 2010. Micronutrient-efficient genotypes for crop yield and nutritional quality in sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30 (1):83–107. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., S. E. Mc Keand, and H. L. Allen. 1991. Genetic variation in nitrogen use efficiency of loblolly pine seedlings. Forest Science 37 (2):613–26. doi: 10.1093/forestscience/37.2.613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., P. Dai, Y. Wang, T. Li, A. A. Webb, Y. Wang, Z. Li, T. Kou, G. Shi, and B. Zhang. 2016. Effects of liming on health and growth of young Schima superba trees under canopy of a Pinus massoniana stand damaged by soil acidification in Chongqing, China. New Forests 47 (6):801–13. doi: 10.1007/s11056-016-9545-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., J. Xu, Y. Zhang, Z. Yuan, M. He, C. Liang, X. Zhuang, and J. Xie. 2015. Sequential bioethanol and biogas production from sugarcane bagasse based on high solids fed-batch SSF. Energy 90:1199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, A. W. M., E. A. Abdeldaym, S. M. Abdelaziz, M. B. I. El-Sawy, and S. Mottaleb. 2019. Synergetic effects of zinc, boron, silicon, and zeolite nanoparticles on confer tolerance in potato plants subjected to salinity. Agronomy 10 (1):19. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10010019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malavolta, E. 1980. Elementos de nutrição mineral de plantas 251. Piracicaba, Brazil: Ceres,
   Google Scholar
• Malavolta, E., G. C. Vitti, and S. A. Oliveira. 1997. Avaliação do estado nutricional das plantas: Princípios e aplicações. Piracicaba, Brazil: POTAFOS.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, L. D., L. S. Machado, M. A. Tomaz, and J. F. T. Amara. 2015. The nutritional efficiency of Coffea ssp. A review. African Journal of Biotechnology, Nairobi 14(9):728–34. doi: 10.5897/AJB2014.14254.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, D. P., J. F. Chim, J. S. Barin, M. Vizzotto, C. A. A. Farias, C. A. Ballus, and M. T. Barcia. 2021. Influence of the cultivar on the composition of blackberry (Rubus spp.) minerals. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 100:103913. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes, D. P., J. Lozano-Sánchez, M. L. Machado, M. Vizzotto, M. Lazzaretti, F. J. J. Leyva-Jimenez, T. da Silveira, E. F. Ries, and M. T. Bacia. 2020. Characterization of a new blackberry cultivar BRS Xingu: Chemical composition, phenolic compounds, and antioxidant capacity in vitro and in vivo. Food Chemistry 322:126783. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtić, S., E. Ahinović, H. Čivić, and E. Sijahović. 2019. Accumulation and dynamics of manganese in raspberry. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 113 (2):221–9. 2019. doi: 10.14720/aas.2019.113.2.3.
   Google Scholar
• Natale, W., and D. E. Rozane. 2018. Análise de solo, folhas e adubação de frutíferas. Registro: Unesp 124. Biblioteca(s): Epagri-São Joaquim.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, I., S. Dos, A. L. Bamberg, C. A. P. Silveira, L. E. C. Antunes, and R. O. Souza. 2020. Nitrogen fertilization in blackberry. In E. Rigobelo and A. Serra (Eds.), Nitrogen fixation. Rijeka: IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.82409.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, I. S., G. Nava, L. Picolotto, G. K. Vignolo, M. A. Gonçalves, and L. E. C. Antunes. 2015. Nutritional requirements and blackberry fertilization. Revista de Ciências Agrarias—Amazon Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 58 (1):96–104. doi: 10.4322/rca.1755.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, I., Dos, S. C. A. P. Silveira, L. Picolotto, F. C. Schneider, L. E. C, and Gonçalves, L. 2013. Constituição química e exportação de nutrientes da amoreira-preta. Revista Congrega URCAMP 9:1–10. https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/91723/1/32.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, I., S. Dos, L. Picolotto, A. P. A. Correa, M. d C. B. Raseira, and L. E. C. Gonçalves. 2014. Informações técnias de cultivares de amoreira-preta, 2. Folder, Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado.
   Google Scholar
• Rietra, R. P., M. Heinen, C. O. Dimkpa, and P. S. Bindraban. 2017. Effects of nutrient antagonism and synergism on yield and fertilizer use efficiency. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 48 (16):1895–920. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2017.1407429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghzadeh, B. 2013. A review of zinc nutrition and plant breeding. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 13. doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162013005000072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. B., and S. Husted. 2019. The biochemical properties of manganese in plants. Plants 8(10):381. doi: 10.3390/plants8100381.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqi, M. Y., and A. D. M. Glass. 1981. Utilization index: A modified approach to the estimation and comparison of nutrient efficiency in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 4 (3):289–302. doi: 10.1080/01904168109362919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikiric, B., D. Cakmak, E. Saljnikov, V. Mrvic, M. Jakovljevic, O. Stajkovic, and D. Bogdanovic. 2011. Otimização dos teores de macroelementos em folhas de framboesa por meio de calagem em solo extremamente ácido. Revista Espanhola de Pesquisa Agrícola 9 (1):329–37. doi: 10.5424/sjar/20110901-450-10.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, E. B., L. R. F. Alleoni, S. R. Santos, S. C. Magalhães, and M. M. M. Farnezi. 2016a. Response of physic nut trees to liming of acidic soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 47 (8):1023–32. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2016.1165827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, L. S., da, L. C. Gatiboni, I. Anghinoni, and R. O. De Souza. 2016b. Manual de calagem e adubação para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina. 11th ed. Brazil: Comissão de Química e Fertilidade Do Solo – RS/SC.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy, 11th ed. Washington, DC: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Strik, B. C., and C. E. Finn. 2012. Blackberry production systems-a worldwide perspective. Acta Horticulturae 946 (946):341–7. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.946.56.
   Google Scholar
• Strik, B. C. 2017. Plant nutrient management. In Blackberries and their hybrids, ed. H. K. Hall and R. C. Funt, 146–68. Wallingford: CABI. doi: 10.1079/9781780646688.0146.
   Google Scholar
• Swiader, J. M., Y. Chyan, and F. G. Freiji. 1994. Genotypic differences in nitrate uptake and utilization efficiency in pumpkin hybrids. Journal of Plant Nutrition 17 (10):1687–99. doi: 10.1080/01904169409364840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, P. C., G. K. Donagemma, A. Fontana, and W. G. Teixeira. 2017. Manual for methods of soil analysis. 3rd ed. Brasília, DF: Embrapa.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaz, M. A., and J. F. T. Amaral. 2008. Eficiência nutricional em plantas. Estudos avançados em produção vegetal. Alegre: Centro de Ciências Agrárias da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo1:300.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaz, M. A., H. E. P. Martinez, C. D. Cruz, R. B. Ferrari, L. Zambolim, and N. S. F. Sakiyama. 2008. Diferenças genéticas na eficiência de absorção, na translocação e na utilização de K, Ca e Mg em mudas enxertadas de cafeeiro. Ciência Rural 38 (6):1540–6. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782008000600008.
   Google Scholar
• Xavier, C. V., and W. Natale. 2017. Influence of boron on the content, accumulation and nutritional efficiency in rootstock of star fruit. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias - Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 12 (1):6–13. doi: 10.5039/agraria.v12i1a5409.
   Google Scholar