Effect of humic acid on callus culture of slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm)Footnote¹

Contribution of the University of Georgia, Agricultural Experiment Station, Athens, GA 30602, USA. This research was supported by State and Hatch funds.

References

• Ahmad , F. and Tan , K.H. 1986 . Effect of lime and organic matter on soybean seedlings grown in aluminum‐toxic soil . Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. , 50 : 656 – 661 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes , R.L. and Naylor , A.W. 1958 . Cultures of pine root callus and the use of Pinus clausa callus in preliminary metabolic studies . Bot. Gaz. , 120 : 63 – 66 .
   Google Scholar
• Birchem , R. , Sommer , H.E. and Brown , C.L. 1981 . Comparison of plastids and pigments of Pinus elliottii Mill, and Pinus elliotti Engelm. in callus cultures . Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. , 102 : 101 – 107 .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , C.L. and Lawrence , R.H. 1968 . Culture of pine callus on a defined medium . Forest Sci. , 14 : 62 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Lau , Y.L. , Knight , H.W. and Cowles , J.R. 1980 . Phenylalanine ammonia iyase activity in callus culture of Pinus elliotti . Physiol. Plant. , 49 : 299 – 303 .
   Google Scholar
• Lee , Y.S. and Bartlett , R.J. 1976 . Stimulation of plant growth by humic substances . Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. , 40 : 876 – 879 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobartini , J.C. and Tan , K.H. 1988 . Differences in humic acid characteristics as determined by carbon‐13 nuclear magnetic resonance, scanning electron microscopy, and infrared analysis . Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. , 52 : 125 – 130 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenberg , J.R. and Skoog , F. 1952 . Pine tissue cultures . Physiol. Plant. , 5 : 33 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Murashige , T. and Skoog , F. 1962 . A revised medium for rapid growth and bioessays with tobacco tissue cultures . Physiol. Plant. , 15 : 473 – 497 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson , R. 1980 . The Pine Tree Book , New York, NY : Brandywine Press, Inc. .
   Google Scholar
• Schnitzer , M. 1982 . “ Organic matter characterization ” . In Methods of Soil Analysis , Agronomy Series No. 9 Edited by: Page , A.L. , Miller , R.H. and Keeney , D.R. 581 – 594 . Madison, WI : American Society of Agronomy .
   Google Scholar
• Snedecor , G.W. and Cochran , W.G. 1974 . Statistical Methods , Ames, IA : The Iowa State University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Tan , K.H. 1976 . Contamination of humic acid by silica gel and sodium bicarbonate . Plant and Soil , 44 : 691 – 695 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan , K.H. and Nopamornbodi , V. 1979 . Effect of different levels of humic acid on nutrient content and growth of corn (Zea mays L.) . Plant and Soil , 52 : 283 – 287 .
   Google Scholar
• Tan , K.H. and Tantiwiramanond , D. 1983 . Effect of humic acids on nodulation and dry matter production of soybean, peanut, and clover . Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. , 47 : 1121 – 1124 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan , D. and MacDonald , S.R. 1976 . Some effects of humic acid on cat ion uptake by parenchyma tissue . Soil Biol. Biochem. , 8 : 415 – 421 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser , S.A. 1986 . “ Effects of humic substances on plant growth ” . In Enichem Agricoltura, Humic Substances. Effects on Soil and Plants , 89 – 135 . Milano, , Italy : Reda, Ramo Editoriale degli Agricoltori .
   Google Scholar
• Contribution of the University of Georgia, Agricultural Experiment Station, Athens, GA 30602, USA. This research was supported by State and Hatch funds.
   Google Scholar
• Corresponding author.
   Google Scholar