Can colpus membrane ornamentation be a reliable taxonomic tool? A case study with some rubiaceous taxa from eastern Himalaya

References

• Baczyński J, Miłobędzka A, Banasiak Ł. 2021. Morphology of pollen in Apiales (Asterids, Eudicots). Phytotaxa. 478(1):1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer B. 2009. A review of molecular phylogenetic studies of Rubiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 96(1):4–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain SA. 1940. The identification of species in fossil pollen of Pinus by size-frequency determinations. American Journal of Botany. 27(5):301–308.
   Google Scholar
• de Block P, Robbrecht E. 1998. Pollen morphology of the Pavetteae (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae) and its taxonomic significance. Grana. 37(5):260–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani M, Akhani H. 2009. Pollen morphological studies in subfamily Suaedoideae (Chenopodiaceae). Grana. 48(2):79–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X-F, Zhang D-X. 2008. Mussaenda lancipetala X. F. Deng & D. X. Zhang, a new species of Rubiaceae from China. Journal of Systematics Evolution. 46(2):220–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessein S, Harwood R, Smets E, Robbrecht E. 2005a. Pollen of the Spermacoce (Rubiaceae) species from the Northern Territory of Australia: morphology and taxonomic significance. Australian Systematic Botany. 18(4):367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessein S, Ochoterena H, de Block P, Lens F, Robbrecht E, Schols P, Smets E, Vinckier S, Huysmans S. 2005b. Palynological characters and their phylogenetic signal in Rubiaceae. Botanical Review. 71(3):354–414.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessein S, Scheltens A, Huysmans S, Robbrecht E, Smets E. 2000. Pollen morphological survey of Pentas (Rubiaceae–Rubioideae) and its closest allies. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 112(4):189–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutra FV, Bellonzi TK, de Souza CN, Gasparino EC. 2020. Pollen morphology of Rubiaceae from Cerrado forest fragments: pollen unit, polarity and diversity of the types of apertures. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 282:104297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. I. Angiosperms. Stockholm (Sweden): Almqvist and Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Erdtman G. 1960. The acetolysis method, a revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 54:561–564.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves-Esteves V, Vieira GRM, de Carvalho RJP, de Melo Crespo SR, Mendonça CBF. 2020. Pollen morphology of some species of Spermacoceae s.s. (Rubiaceae) of the Atlantic Forest, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 34(2):243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Liao Q, Guo X, Zhou S, Guo Y, Zhang Y, Wang R. 2020. Pollen morphology of Leptodermis (Rubiaceae) and its systematic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 306(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01641-3
   Google Scholar
• Halbritter H, Hesse M. 1993. Sulcus morphology in some monocot families. Grana. 32(2):87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen BCS, Engstrom DR. 1985. A comparison of numerical and qualitative methods of separating pollen of black and white spruce. Canadian Journal of Botany. 63(12):2159–2163.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans S, Dessein E, Smets E, Robbrecht E. 2003. Pollen morphology of NW European representatives confirms monophyly of Rubieae (Rubiaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 127(3-4):219–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans S, Robbrecht E, Delprete P, Smets E. 1999. Pollen morphological support for the Catesbaeeae-Chiococceae-Exostema-complex (Rubiaceae). Grana. 38(6):325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson JT. 1987. Pollen morphology of the tribe Morindeae (Rubiaceae). Grana. 26(2):134–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joly C, Barillé L, Barreau M, Mancheron A, Visset L. 2007. Grain and annulus diameter as criteria for distinguishing pollen grains of cereals from wild grasses. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 146(1-4):221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang Y-F, Kirchoff BK, Tang Y-J, Liang Y-H, Liao J-P. 2008. Palynological characters and their systematic significance in Naucleeae (Cinchonoideae, Rubiaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 151(3-4):123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mander L, Li M, Mio W, Fowlkes CC, Punyasena SW. 2013. Classification of grass pollen through the quantitative analysis of surface ornamentation and texture. Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 280(1770):20131905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew PM, Philip O. 1983. Studies in the pollen morphology of south Indian Rubiaceae. In: Nair PKK, editor. Advances in Pollen Spore Research. Vol. 10. New Delhi (India): Today's and Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers; p. 1–80.
   Google Scholar
• Melhem TS, del Rossi CLB, Silvestre MSF. 1974. Pollen morphological studies in Rubiaceae. Hoehnea. 4:49–70.
   Google Scholar
• Molina LS, Zequeira MF, Oliver PH. 2002. Pollen morphology of some Cuban Guettarda species (Rubiaceae: Guettardeae). Grana. 41(3):142–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naiki A, Nagamasu H. 2003. Distyly and pollen dimorphism in Damnacanthus (Rubiaceae). Journal of Plant Research. 116(2):105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair PKK. 1970. Crop palynology and its significance in agricultural research. Journal of Palynology. 6:25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Neupane S, Dessein S, Wikström N, Lewis PO, Long C, Bremer B, Motley TJ. 2015. The Hedyotis-Oldenlandia complex (Rubiaceae: Spermacoceae) in Asia and the Pacific: phylogeny revisited with new generic delimitations. Taxon. 64(2):299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson C. 1993. Pollen morphology of the Gardenieae-Gardeniinae (Rubiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany. 13(5):561–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perveen A, Qaiser M. 2007. Pollen flora of Pakistan–LIV. Rubiaceae. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 39(4):999–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt W, Hoen PP, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Thomas AL. 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 143(1-2):1–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubik DW, Moreno JE. 1991. Pollen and spores of Barro Colorado Island. Monogr Syst Bot. 36:1–270.
   Google Scholar
• Robbrecht E. 1982. Pollen morphology of the tribes Anthospermeae and Paederieae (Rubiaceae) in relation to taxonomy. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique/Bulletin Van de National Plantentuin Van België. 52(3/4):349–366.
   Google Scholar
• Silveira CEA, Jr, Saba MD, Jardim JG. 2012. Pollen morphology of Rubiaceae Juss. species occurring in an area of caatinga (dryland) vegetation in Bahia State, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 26(2):444–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaguru M, Mander L, Fried G, Punyasena SW. 2012. Capturing the surface texture and shape of pollen: a comparison of microscopy techniques. PLoS One. 7(6):e39129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza MM, Martins ER, Pereira TNS, de Oliveira LO. 2008. Reproductive studies in Ipecac (Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stockes; Rubiaceae): pollen development and morphology. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 51(5):981–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlik-Wyremblewska A. 2014. Pollen morphology of the genus Rubus L. I. Introductory studies on the European representatives of the subgenus Rubus L. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. 64(2):187–203.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Montúfar A, Ramírez-Arriaga E, Martínez-Hernández E, Ochoterena H. 2020. Systematic relevance of the pollen morphology for the Rondeletia complex (Cinchonoideae, Rubiaceae). J Linn Soc Bot. 20:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Verellen J, Dessein S, Razafimandimbison SG, Smets E, Huysmans S. 2007. Pollen morphology of the tribes Naucleeae and Hymenodictyeae (Rubiaceae–Cinchonoideae) and its phylogenetic significance. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 153(3):329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie P, Zhang D. 2010. Pollen morphology supports the transfer of Wendlandia (Rubiaceae) out of Rondeletieae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 164(2):128–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar