Contribution to Celastraceae palynology from Cerrado forest fragments: a focus on shape, amb and exine ornamentation

References

• Aoki C, Pereira SR, Matos WH. 2016. Florística e fitossociologia de um fragmento de cerrado em Itirapina-SP. Relatórios de projetos desenvolvidos na disciplina NE211-Ecologia de Campo II do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, IB, UNICAMP; [accessed 2022 Aug 31]. http://www.ib.unicamp.br/profs/fsantos/ecocampo/ne211/20065.
   Google Scholar
• APG IV. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 181:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer RH, Van-Wyk AE. 1992. Palynology and intergenetic relationships in some southern African of subfamily Cassinoideae (Celastraceae). Grana. 31(4):241–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauermann SG, Evaldt ACP, Branco SC. 2009. Atlas De Pólen e Esporos do Vale do Rio Caí – RS. Revista Árvore. 33(5):895–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belonsi TK, Gasparino EC. 2015. Pollen morphology of Malpighiaceae from Brazilian forest fragments. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 38(2):379–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellonzi TK, Dutra FV, Souza CN, Rezende AA, Gasparino EC. 2020. Pollen types of Sapindaceae from Brazilian forest fragments: apertural variation. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 34(2):327–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biral L, Simmons MP, Smidt EC, Tembrock LR, Bolson M, Archer RH, Lombardi JA. 2017. Systematics of a New World Maytenus (Celastraceae) and a new delimitation of the genus. Systematic Botany. 42(4):680–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogota AR, Sánchez LR. 2001. Caracterización Palinológica de La Familia Celastraceae para Colombia: aproximación inicial. Caldasia. 23(1):269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Brenan JPM. 1953. Plants collected by the Vernay Nyassaland Expedition of 1946. Celastraceae. Memoris of the New York Botanical Garden. 8:236–238.
   Google Scholar
• Cassino R, Meyer KEB. 2011. Morfologia de grãos de pólen e esporos de níveis holocênicos de uma vereda do Chapadão dos Gerais (Buritizeiro, Minas Gerais), Brasil. Gaea – Journal of Geoscience. 7(1):41–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cassino RF, Martinho CT, Caminha S. 2016. Diversidade de grãos de pólen das principais fitofisionomias do cerrado e implicações paleoambientais. Gaea – Journal of Geoscience. 9(1):4–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz-Barros MAV, Santos VA, Corrêa AMS. 2005. Flora Polínica da Reserva do Parque das Fontes do Ipiranga (São Paulo, Brasil). Hoehnea. 32(I):127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Dutra FV, Bellonzi TK, Souza CN, Gasparino EC. 2020. Pollen morphology of Rubiaceae from Cerrado forest fragments: pollen unit, polarity and diversity of the types of apertures. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 282:104297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutra FV, Gasparino EC. 2018. Pollen morphology of Rutaceae from Brazilian forest fragments. Palynology. 42(1):43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy – angiosperms. Stockholm (Sweden): Alquimist & Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Erdtman G. 1960. The acetolysis method – a revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 54:561–564.
   Google Scholar
• Faegri G, Iversen J. 1966. Textbook of modern pollen analysis. 2th ed. Copenhagen (Denmark): Scandinavian University Books.
   Google Scholar
• Flora do Brasil. 2020. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. (em construção); [accessed 2022 Aug 05]. https://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/FB82.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparino EC, Cruz-Barros MAV, Chautems A. 2013. Pollen morphology in Brazilian species of Codonanthe (Mart.) Hanst. and Nematanthus Schrader (Gesneriaceae). Grana. 52(4):258–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrilova OA, Britski DA, Grigorieva VV, Tarasevich VF, Pozhidaev AE, Leunova VM. 2018. Pollen morphology of the genus Euonymus (Celastraceae). Turczaninowia. 21:88–206.
   Google Scholar
• Godoy SM, Alonso-Pereira AR, Romagnolo MB, Risso-Pascotto C. 2012. Complex of pollen mother cell and polyad production during microsporogenesis in Hippocratea volubilis (Hippocrateaceae). Caryologia. 65(4):335–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves-Esteves V, Melhem TS. 1998. Palinotaxonomia de Espécies Brasileiras de Tontelea Aubl. (Hippocrateaceae Juss.). Polibotánica. 7:33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves-Esteves V, Melhem TS. 2002. Palinotaxonomia de Espécies Brasileiras de Peritassa Miers (Hippocrateaceae Juss.). Acta Botanica Brasilica. 16(2):175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves-Esteves V, Melhem TS. 2004. Palinotaxonomia de Espécies Brasileiras de Cheiloclinium Miers (Hippocrateaceae Juss.). Acta Botanica Brasilica. 18(3):503–512.
   Google Scholar
• Groppo M, Simmons MP, Cappa JJ, Biral L, Lombardi JAA. 2014. A new species of Maytenus (Celastraceae) with fleshy fruits from Eastern Brazil, with notes on the delimitation of Maytenus. Systematic Botany. 39(2):478–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halle N. 1962. Monographie des Hippocrateacees d‘Afrique occidentale. Mémoires de l'Institut Français d'Afrique Noire. 64:1–245.
   Google Scholar
• Halle N. 1978. Revision monographique dês Hippocrateae (Celastr.): 1. Les especes de Madagascar. Adansonia. 17:397–414.
   Google Scholar
• Halle N. 1981. Revision des Hippocrateae (Celastraceae): 2. Le genre Pristimera Miersen Afrique et en Indonesie. Adansonia. 3:5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Halle N. 1983. Revision des Hippocrateae (Celastreae): 3. Fruits, graines et structures placentaires. Adansonia. 5:11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Halle N. 1984. Revision des Hippocrateae (Celastraceae): 4. Les genres Simirestis et Arnicratea (gen. nov.). Adansonia. 6:3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse M, Halbritter H, Zetter R, Weber M, Buchner R, Frosch-Radivo A, Ulrich S. 2009. Pollen terminology an illustrated handbook. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hou D. 1955. A revision of the Genus Celastrus. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 42(3):215–302.
   Google Scholar
• Hou D. 1962. Celastraceae. Flora Malesiana – series. Spermatophyta. 6(1):227–291.
   Google Scholar
• Jordaan M, Van-Wyk AE. 1999. Systematic studies in subfamily Celastroideae (Celastraceae) in Southern Africa: reinstatement of the genus Gymnosporia. South African Journal of Botany. 65(2):177–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordaan M, Van-Wyk AE. 2003. A taxonomic revision of the Gymnosporia mossambicensis group (Celastraceae: Celastroideae). Kew Bulletin. 58(4):833–866.
   Google Scholar
• Kronka FJN, Nalon MA, Matsukuma CK, Kanashiro MM, Shin-Ike Ywane MS, Pavão M, Durigan G, Lima LMPR, Guillaumon JR, Baitello JB, Borgo SC, et al. 2005. Inventário florestal da vegetação do Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo (Brazil): Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Landi LADC, Gasparino EC. 2018. Palinologia de Amaranthaceae e Arialiaceae nativas em fragmentos florestais remanescentes da região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo. Hoehnea. 45(1):115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Landi LADC, Sabbag LC, Gasparino EC. 2021. A taxonomic aid arising from pollen grains of Cestrum L. and Solanum L. (Solanaceae): differences in ornamentation and aperture. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 35(4):540–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landi LADC, Torrati-Guioti PG, Gasparino EC. 2022. Pollen morphology of Boraginaceae s.l. from Brazilian forest fragments: aperture types and ornamentation on Cordiaceae and Heliotropiaceae. Palynology. 46(2):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão-Filho HF. 1982. Aspectos taxonômicos das florestas do estado de São Paulo. Silvicultura em São Paulo. 16(1):197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Leitão-Filho HF. 1987. Considerações sobre a florística de florestas tropicais e sub-tropicais do Brasil. Instituto de Pesquisas Florestais. 35:41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes ACV, Souza CN, Saba MD, Gasparino EC. 2022. Pollen morphology of Malvaceae s.l. from Cerrado forest fragments: details of aperture and ornamentation in the pollen types definition. Palynology. 46(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews ML, Endress PK. 2005. Comparative floral structure and systematics in Celastrales (Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae, Lepidobotryaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 149(2):129–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune B, Mefford MJ. 2011. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of EcologicalData (Version 6). Gleneden Beach (OR): MjM Software.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna MJ, Simmons MP, Bacon CD, Lombardi JA. 2011. Delimitation of the segregate genera of Maytenuss. l. (Celastraceae) based on morphological and molecular characters. Systematic Botany. 36(4):922–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melhem TS, Cruz-Barros MAV, Corrêa MAS, Makino-Watanabe H, Silvestre-Capelato MSF, Vl G-E. 2003. Variabilidade polínica em plantas de Campos do Jordão (São Paulo, Brasil). Boletim do Instituto de Botânica de São Paulo. 16:1–104.
   Google Scholar
• Melhem TS, Matos MER. 1972. Variabilidade de forma dos grãos de pólen de Eriope crassipes Benth. Labiatae. Hoehnea. 2:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Nagamitsu T, Nagamasu H. 1994. Keys for the pollen of Ashiu, Central Japan. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory Kyoto University. 28:261–355.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Filho AT, Fontes MAL. 2000. Patterns of floristic differentiation among atlantic forests in Southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica. 32(4b):793–810.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira BAS, Venturoli F, Carvalho FA. 2011. Florestas estacionais no cerrado: uma visão geral. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical. 41(3):446–455.
   Google Scholar
• Perveen A, Qaiser M. 2008. Pollen Flora of Pakistan-LVIII. Celastraceae. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 40(3):957–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt W, Hoen PP, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Le Thomas A. 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 143(1-2):1–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaeski JN, Evaldt ACP, Bauermann SG. 2014. Grãos De Pólen de Espécies Ocorrentes na Unidade de Conservação Parque Estadual do Espinilho, Barra do Quaraí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Pesquisas, Botânica. 65:305–332.
   Google Scholar
• Ranga NT, Rezende AA, Cavasan O, Toniato MTZ, Cielo-Filho R, Stranghetti V. 2012. Caracterização florística de remanescentes de vegetação nativa da região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo. In: Necchi O, Jr, editor. Fauna e Flora de Fragmentos Florestais Remanescentes da Região Noroeste do Estado de São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto (Brazil): Holos Editora; p. 105–135.
   Google Scholar
• Reis SM, Mohr A, Gomes L, Abreu MF, Lenza E. 2014. Síndromes de Polinização e Dispersão de espécies lenhosas em um fragmento de cerrado sentido restrito na transição Cerrado-Floresta Amazônica. Heringeriana. 6(2):28–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter LMO, Moro RS. 2007. Caracterização fitofisionômica dos fragmentos campestres com fácies de cerrado em Ponta Grossa PR. Revista Brasileira de Biociências. 5(S2):192–194.
   Google Scholar
• Robson N, Halle N, Mathew B, Blakelock R. 1994. Celastraceae. In: Polhill RM, editor. Flora of Tropical East Africa. Rotterdam (The Netherlands): A.A. Balkema; p. 1–78.
   Google Scholar
• Roubik DW, Moreno PJE. 1991. Pollen and spores of Barro Colorado Island. Monographs in systematic botany. Vol. 36. St. Louis (MO): Missouri Botanical Garden; p. 1–270.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado-Labouriau ML. 1973. Contribuição à palinologia dos Cerrados. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Academia Brasileira de Ciência.
   Google Scholar
• Savolainen V, Manen JF, Douzery E, Spichiger R. 1994. Molecular phylogeny of families related to Celastrales based on rbcL 5' flanking sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 3(1):27–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd GJ. 1996. Fitopac 1: manual do usuário. Campinas (Brazil): Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons MP, Bacon CD, Cappa JJ, Mckenna MJ. 2012. Phylogeny of Celastraceae subfamilies Cassinoideae and Tripterygioideae inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid loci. Systematic Botany. 37(2):456–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons MP, Hedin JP. 1999. Relationships and morphological character change among genera of Celastraceaes. l. (including Hippocrateaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 86(3):723–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons MP, Savolainen V, Clevinger CC, Archer RH, Davis JI. 2001. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from 26S nrDNA, phytochrome B, atpB, rbcL, and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 19(3):353–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares EL, Landi LADC, Gasparino EC. 2021. Additions to the knowledge of the pollen morphology of some Fabaceae from Cerrado forest patches of Brazil. Palynology. 45(2):269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares EL, Landi LADC, Souza CND, Gasparino EC. 2022. Polyads types of the mimosoid clade (Cesalpinioideae, Fabaceae): seize and pollen numbers variations. Grana. 61(1):45–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza CN, Gasparino EC. 2014. Pollen morphology of Fridericia Mart. (Bignoniaceae) from Brazilian forest fragments. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 37(1):83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza CN, Rezende AA, Gasparino EC. 2019. Pollen morphology of Bignoniaceae from Brazilian forest fragments and its systematic significance. Palynology. 43(2):333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiers B. 2016. Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. (New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual herbarium); [accessed 2022 Jan 07]. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira S. 2011. Introdução à Bioestatística. 4a ed. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 2010. Biostatistical analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle (NJ): Pearson Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar