The Roma and Wall Street/CEOs: linguistic construction of identity in U.S. and Canadian crime reports

References

• Agger, B. (1998). Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: Their sociological relevance. Illuminations. Arlington: University of Texas. Retrieved from http://www.uta.edu/huma/illuminations
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, K. (2012). Roma refused: Changes to refugee law shut doors to persecuted minority. Toronto Media Coop. Retrieved from http://toronto.mediacoop.ca/story/roma-refused/10555
   Google Scholar
• Box, S. (1983). Power, crime and mystification. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Catalano, T. (2011a). Xeno-racism and discursive construction of “us” vs “them”: Cosa nostra, wall street, and immigrant. (PhD dissertation). University of Arizona, Tucsan, AZ. Retrieved from http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/145423/1/azu_etd_11550_sip1_m.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Catalano, T. (2011b). Romanies and the Mafia: “Us” vs. “Them” in Italian crime reports. Presentation given at the Inaugural Romani Studies Conference, Berkeley, CA, November 10.
   Google Scholar
• Cheadle, B. (2012). Bill C-31: “Gypsy Fiction” being Fanned By conservative refugee legislation, Roma advocate says. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/05/03/bill-c-31-gypsy-roma_n_1476059.html
   Google Scholar
• Clinard, M. B., & Yeager, P. (2006). Corporate crime. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Dirven, R., Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H. G. (2007). Cognitive linguistics, ideology and critical discourse analysis. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1222–1240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. (2012, October 17). Hungarian Roma refugee claimants targeted in CBSA report. CBC. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/10/17/pol-cbsa-project-sara-immigrants-hungary-roma.html
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1999). Global capitalism and “Critical awareness of language”. Language Awareness, 8(2), 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2000). Discourse, social theory, and social research: The discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 163–195.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2008). Cultural Criminology: An invitation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structural anthology (pp. 48–78). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gelbart, P. (2012, January 4). Gadjology: A brief introduction. Presentation given at the Romani Studies Conference, Berkeley, CA, November 10, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cup3fwqsoLE
   Google Scholar
• Getsay, T. (1982). Gypsy crime. Kansas State FOP Journal, 1(2/3), 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, H. (2009). Colombia bilingüe: Access for all? (PhD dissertation). University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1992). The west and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of Modernity (pp. 275–331). Open University: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, I. (1987). The pariah syndrome: An account of gypsy slavery. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, I. (1994, April 14). On the origin and current situation of the Romani population in Europe and the responsibility of the American media to make that situation known. Report before the congressional human rights hearing on abuses against gypsies in Eastern Europe, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, I. (2002). We are the Romani people: Ame sam e Rromane dzene. Hatfield: The University of Hertfordshire Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, I. (2010). Gypsy Mafia, Romani Saints: The racial profiling of Romani Americans. In D. Karanth, (Ed.), Danger! Educated gypsy: Selected essays by Ian Hancock (pp. 195–211). Hatfield: The University of Hertfordshire Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. London, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, K., & Presdee, M. (Eds.) (2010). Framing crime: Cultural criminology and the image. Abingdon: Glasshouse-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kates, G., & Gergely, V. (2011, April 7). For Roma, life in US has challenges: People commonly known as ‘Gypsies’ face stereotyping, discrimination. Voice of America. Retrieved from http://www.voanews.com/content/for-roma-life-in-us-has-challenges-119394819/163156.html
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed. 2007). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyzanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The Politics of exclusion: Debating migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2006). Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision. New York, NY: George Lakoff and the Rockridge Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By (2nd ed. 2003). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. (1998). Roma in Canada. Retrieved from http://www.romatoronto.org/facts_canada.html
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, K. (2006). Cooperative principle. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 176–183). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00311-4
   Google Scholar
• Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework: A social psychological analysis of voluntary risk taking. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 887–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 14–31). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, A., & Machin, D. (2012). The language of crime and deviance: An introduction to critical linguistic analysis in media and popular culture. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Minkes, J., & Minkes, L. (2010). Tax fraud and benefit evasion. In T. Bennett, F. Brookman, M. Maguire & H. Pierpoint (Eds.), Handbook on crime. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Presdee, M. (1994). Young people, culture and the construction of crime: Doing wrong versus doing crime. In G. Barak (Ed.), Varieties of criminology readings from a dynamic discipline (pp. 179–87). London: Praeger,
   Google Scholar
• Presdee, M. (2000). Cultural criminology and the carnival of crime. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, M. E. (2006). Transitivity: Stylistics approaches. In Encyclopeida of language and linguistics (2nd Ed.) (pp. 40–46). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00561-7
   Google Scholar
• Sandland, R. (1996). The real, the simulacrum, and the construction of “gypsy” in law. Journal of Law and Society, 23(3), 383–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santa Ana. (1999). Like an animal I was treated: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse and Society, 10, 191–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P., & Tumber, H. (1993). Fighting the war against crime: Televsion, police and audience. British Journal of Criminology, 33(1), 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse as social interaction. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Selley, C. (2012, October 12). How Europe’s Roma problem became ours. National Post. Retrieved from http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/10/12/chris-selley-how-europes-roma-problem-became-ours/
   Google Scholar
• Sigona, N. (2003). How can a “Nomad” be a “Refugee”? Kosovo Roma and labeling policy in Italy. Sociology, 37(1), 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sigona, N. (2005). Locating “The Gypsy Problem”. The Roma in Italy: Stereotyping, Labelling and “Nomad Camps”. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(4), 741–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication. 23, 193–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. (2013, February 18). Interview on School for Linguists website. In Which I interview an article: Silverstein on indexical order. Retrieved from http://schoolforlinguists.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/in-which-i-interview-an-article-silverstein-on-indexical-order/
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szandelszky, B. (2012, September 15). Stop vilifying Roma refugees. The Star. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1257206--stop-vilifying-roma-refugees
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Thwaites, T. Davies, L., & Mules, W. (2002). Introducing cultural and media studies: A semiotic approach. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (1993b). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249–283.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webley, K. (2010, October 1). Hounded in Europe, Roma in the US keep a low profile. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2025316,00.html
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2003). Themes in discourse research: The case of Diana. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 14–29). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & van Dijk, T. (2000). Racism at the top: Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states. Amsterdam: Drava Verlag.
   Google Scholar