Gender inequality and homicide: a cross-national examination

References

• Austin, R. L., & Kim, Y. S. (2000). A cross-national examination of the relationship between gender inequality and rape rates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 204–221. doi:10.1177/0306624X00442006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avakame, E. F. (1999). Females’ labor force participation and intimate femicide: An empirical assessment of the backlash hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 14, 277–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avison, W. R., & Loring, P. L. (1986). Population diversity and cross-national homicide: The effects of inequality and heterogeneity. Criminology, 24(4), 733–749. doi:10.1111/crim.1986.24.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, W. C., & Peterson, R. D. (1995). Gender inequality and violence against women: The case of murder. In J. Hagan & R. D. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 174–205). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. R. (1991). Development and crime. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 343–363. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D., & Feldman, S. (1985). Multiple regression in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, V. E., & Smith, M. (1995). Gender inequality and rape of female homicide victimization across U.S. cites. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 32(2), 175–190. doi:10.1177/0022427895032002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butchart, A., & Engström, K. (2002). Sex- and age-specific relations between economic development, economic inequality and homicide rates in people aged 0-24 years: A cross-sectional analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80(10), 797–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz, J. S. (1984). Sex and advantage: A comparative macro-structural theory of sex stratification. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
   Google Scholar
• Chon, D. S. (2016). A spurious relationship of gender equality with female homicide victimization: A cross-national analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 62(3), 397–419. doi:10.1177/0011128713492497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 497–538. doi:10.1080/07418828800089871
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K. A. (1996). Women as victims and perpetrators of homicide: A test of three theories of women’s criminality ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• DeWees, M. A., & Parker, K. F. (2003). The political economy of urban homicide: Assessing the relative impact of gender inequality on sex-specific victimization. Violence and Victims, 18(1), 35–54. doi:10.1891/vivi.2003.18.1.35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drieze, J., & Khera, R. (2000). Crime, gender, and society in India: Insights from homicide data. Population & Development Review, 26(2), 335–352. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00335.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugan, L., Nagin, D., & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies, 3, 187–214. doi:10.1177/1088767999003003001
   Google Scholar
• Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (2003). Do domestic violence services save lives?. National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 20-25. doi:10.1037/e569102006-005
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1893 /1964). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, L., & Beattie, C. (1983). The feminist explanation for rape: An empirical test. Journal of Sex Research, 19(1), 74–93. doi:10.1080/00224498309551170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eschholz, S., & Vieraitis, L. M. (2004). Race-specific gender equality and rape: A further test of feminist hypotheses. Critical Criminology, 12(2), 195–219. doi:10.1023/B:CRIT.0000040257.84183.e5
   Google Scholar
• Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loayza, N. (2002). Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 45(1), 1–40. doi:10.1086/338347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom House. (2013). Democratic indicators. Retrieved 2013, July 31. from http://www.freedomhouse.org/
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, R. (1990). The victims of homicide: A temporal and cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 55(1), 92–106. doi:10.2307/2095705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, R., Baker, K., & Pampel, F. C. (1990). Gender stratification and the gender gap in homicide victimization. Social Problems, 37, 593–621. doi:10.2307/800584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, D. K., & Bankston, W. B. (1997). Gender equality and the sex ratio of intimate killing. Criminology, 35, 577–600. doi:10.1111/crim.1997.35.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. B., & Quigley, J. M. (1982). Population heterogeneity and the sociogenesis of homicide. Social Forces, 61(1), 206–224. doi:10.2307/2578082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie, D., & Armstrong, D. (2006). Race- and gender-disaggregated homicide offending rates. Homicide Studies, 10, 3–32. doi:10.1177/1088767905281518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. S. (1995). A cross-national analysis on the effect of moral individualism on murder rates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 53–75. doi:10.1177/0306624X9503900108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. S. W. (2001). A research note on reporting discrepancies in international homicide data. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 25(2), 167–181. doi:10.1080/01924036.2001.9678672
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, D., & Richardson, A. M. (2008). Economic inequality and homicide in the developed nations from 1975 to 1995. Homicide Studies, 12(1), 28–45. doi:10.1177/1088767907311849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaquette, J. S., & Summerfield, G. (Eds.). (2007). Women and gender equity in development theory and practice: Institutions, resources, and mobilization. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karstedt, S. (2006). Democracy, values, and violence: Paradoxes, tensions, and comparative advantages of liberal inclusion. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 50–81. doi:10.1177/0002716206288248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedzie, C. R. (2002). Coincident revolutions and the dictator’s dilemma: Thoughts on communication and democratization. In J. E. Allison (Ed.), Technology, Development, and Democracy (pp. 105–130). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kick, E. L., & Lafree, G. D. (1985). Development and the social context of murder and theft. Comparative Social Research, 8, 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Mee, A. P. (2002). Statistics for data analysis (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson.
   Google Scholar
• Koeppel, M. D. H., Rhineberger-Dunn, G. M., & Mack, K. Y. (2015). Cross-national homicide: A review of the current literature. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 39(1), 47–85. doi:10.1080/01924036.2013.836676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahn, H., Hartnagel, T. F., & Gartrell, J. W. (1986). Income inequality and homicide rates: Cross-national data and criminological theories. Criminology, 24, 269–295. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb01496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, M. D. (1976). Inequality, unemployment and crime: A cross-national analysis. Sociological Quarterly, 17, 303–313. doi:10.1111/tsq.1976.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, M. D. (1978). A Durkheimian analysis of international crime rates. Social Forces, 57(2), 654–670. doi:10.2307/2577688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt, C., & Gartner, R. (1993). Introduction to the special issue on gender, crime, and criminal justice. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(4), 323–327. doi:10.1007/BF01064107
   Google Scholar
• Lafee, G., & Tseloni, A. (2006). Democracy and crime: A multilevel analysis of homicide trends in forty-four countries, 1950-2000. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 25–49. doi:10.1177/0002716206287169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafree, G., & Kick, E. L. (1986). Cross-national effects of development, distributional, and demographic variables on crime: A review and analysis. International Annals of Criminology, 24, 213–235.
   Google Scholar
• Lafree, G. D. (1999). A summary and review of cross-national comparative studies of homicide. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of research (pp. 125–145). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. R. (2001). Population growth, economic inequality, and homicide. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 491–516. doi:10.1080/016396201753227709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, L. R. (1976). The sociology of law and order. Montreal: The Book Center.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, S. F. (1982). Societal development, social equality, and homicide: A cross-national test of the Durkheimian model. Social Forces, 61(1), 225–240. doi:10.2307/2578083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, S. F. (1989). Economic discrimination and societal homicide rates: Further evidence on the cost of inequality. American Sociological Review, 54, 597–611. doi:10.2307/2095881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, S. F. (1992). Exploring the consequences of erratic data reporting for cross-national research on homicide. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 8, 155–1573. doi:10.1007/BF01066742
   Google Scholar
• Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Political restraint of the market levels of criminal homicide: A cross-national application of institutional-anomie theory. Social Forces, 75, 1393–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. D., & Daday, J. (2010). Barriers to human capital development: Case studies in Swaziland, Cameroon, and Kenya. African Education Review, 7(2), 283–304. doi:10.1080/18146627.2010.515418
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, O. (1963). On the accuracy of economic observations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, C. O. N. (1993). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice and training. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neapolitan, J. L. (1996). Cross-national crime data: Some unaddressed problems. Journal of Crime and Justice, 19, 95–112. doi:10.1080/0735648X.1996.9721531
   Google Scholar
• Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1989). Applied linear regression models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. (2003). Good policy can lower violent crime: Evidence from a cross-national panel of homicide rates, 1980-97. Journal of Peace Research, 40(6), 619–640. doi:10.1177/00223433030406001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouimet, M. (2012). A world of homicides: The effect of economic development, income inequality, and excess infant mortality on the homicide rate for 165 countries in 2010. Homicide Studies, 16(3), 238–258. doi:10.1177/1088767912442500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampel, F. C., & Gartner, R. (1995). Age-structure, socio-political institutions, and national homicide rates. Sociological Review, 11(3), 243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. N. (1998). Alcohol, homicide, and cultural context: A cross-national analysis of gender-specific homicide victimization. Homicide Studies, 2(1), 6–30. doi:10.1177/1088767998002001002
   Google Scholar
• Pazzani, L. M. (2007). The factors affecting sexual assaults committed by strangers and acquaintances. Violence against Women, 13(7), 717–749. doi:10.1177/1077801207302699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41(3), 611–643. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00999.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pridemore, W. (2008). A methodological addition to the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide: A first test of the poverty-homicide thesis. Criminology, 46(1), 133–154. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00106.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pridemore, W. (2011). Poverty matters: A reassessment of the inequality–homicide relationship in cross-national studies. British Journal of Criminology, 51(5), 739–772. doi:10.1093/bjc/azr019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, D. (1975). The politics of rape: The victim’s perspective. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Stein & Day.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, L. P. (1980). The study of crime in Marxist countries. In G. R. Newman (Ed.), Crime and deviance (pp. 68-81)). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, J., Bennett, R. R., & Danner, M. (2008). Economic assistance and crime: A cross-national investigation. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 217–238. doi:10.1177/1477370807087645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38(4), 1021–1042. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb01413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlan, S. J. (2010). Gender, development, and HIV/AIDS: Implications for child mortality in less industrialized countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 51(3), 211–232. doi:10.1177/0020715210363458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2009). Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values effects of gender equality. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 97(1), 171–185. doi:10.1037/a0015546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwendinger, J. H., & Schwendinger, H. (1983). Rape and inequality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• South, S. J., & Messner, S. F. (1987). The sex ration and women’s involvement in crime: A cross-national analysis. Sociological Quarterly, 28(2), 171–188. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1987.tb00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, K. (1992). Intimate femicide: An ecological analysis. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 29, 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Titterington, V. B. (2006). A retrospective investigation of gender inequality and female homicide victimization. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 205–231. doi:10.1080/02732170500463429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2010). Human Development Report 2010. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/hdr/human_developmentreport2010.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime. (2011). Global study on homicide. Retrieved fromhttp://www.unodc.org/gsh/en/data.html accessed on 21 March 2014
   Google Scholar
• Vieraitis, L. M., Britto, S., & Morris, R. G. (2015). Assessing the impact of changes in gender equality on female homicide victimization 1980-2000. Crime & Delinquency, 61(3), 428–453. doi:10.1177/0011128711420100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieraitis, L. M., Britto, S., & Kovandzic, T. V. (2007). The impact of women’s status and gender inequality on female homicide victimization rates: Evidence from US counties. Feminist Criminology, 2(1), 57-73. doi:10.1177/1557085106294187
   Google Scholar
• Vieraitis, L. M., Kovandzic, T. V., & Britto, S. (2008). Women’s status and risk of homicide victimization: An analysis with data disaggregated by victim-offender relationship. Homicide Studies, 12(2), 163–176. doi:10.1177/1088767907313148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieraitis, L. M., & Williams, M. R. (2002). Assessing the impact of gender inequality on female homicide victimization across U.S. cities: A racially disaggregated analysis. Violence Against Women, 8, 35–63. doi:10.1177/10778010222182937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley, R., & Messner, S. F. (2002). Gender equality and gendered homicides. Homicide Studies, 6(3), 188–210. doi:10.1177/108876790200600302
   Google Scholar
• Whaley, R. B. (2001). The paradoxical relationship between gender inequality and rape: Toward a refined theory. Gender & Society, 15(4), 531–555. doi:10.1177/089124301015004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar