Knowing from where to start: a plea for more and better systematic literature reviews about the effectiveness of legal rights for crime victims

References

• Benitez, C. T., McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2010). Do protection orders protect? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38(3), 376–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, R. C., & Nanavati, J. (2016). Realist review: Current practice and future prospects. Journal of Research Practice, 12(1). Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/538/449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biffi, E., Mulder, E., Pemberton, A., Santos, M., Valério, M., Vanfraechem, I., & Van der Vorm, B. (2016). Project ivor: Implementing victim-oriented reform of the criminal justice system in the European Union. Lisbon, Portugal: Associação Portuguesa de Apoio à Vítima. Retrieved from https://www.apav.pt/ivor/images/ivor/PDFs/IVOR-Repot-WebVersion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brienen, M. E. I., & Hoegen, E. H. (2000). Victims of crime in 22 European criminal justice systems: The implementation of recommendation (85) 11 of the Council of Europe on the position of the victim in the framework of criminal law and procedure. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.wodc.nl/onderzoeksdatabase/ewb2989-victims-of-crime-in-22-european-criminal-justice-systems.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A. W., & Altman, D. G. (2005). Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: Review of publications and survey of authors. The British Medical Journal, 330(7494), 753. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com/content/330/7494/753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daigle, L. E. (2018). Victimology: The essentials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, C., Morgan, A., Hulme, S., Manning, M., & Wong, G. (2018). Protection orders for domestic violence: A systematic review. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 551. Retrieved from https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi551
   Google Scholar
• Dussich, J. P. (2015). The evolution of international victimology and its current status in the world today. Revista de Victimología/Journal of Victimology, 1(2), 37–81.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E. (1994). Victim participation in sentencing: And the debate goes on …. International Review of Victimology, 3(1–2), 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fattah, E. A. (1999). From a handful of dollars to tea and sympathy: The sad history of victim assistance. In J. J. M. Van Dijk, R. G. A. Van Kaam, & J. Wemmers (Eds.), Caring for crime victims: Selected proceedings of the 9th international symposium on victimology (pp. 187–206). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, K. A., & Shjarback, J. A. (2016). What works to reduce victimisation? Synthesising what we know and where to go from here. Violence and Victims, 31(2), 285–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin, M. (2012). Harmony or discord between victim agency and the criminal justice system: A comment on DePrince, Belknap, Labus, Buckingham, and Gover. Violence against Women, 18(8), 889–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeson, M. R., & Campbell, R. (2013). Sexual Assault Response Teams (SARTs): An empirical review of their effectiveness and challenges to successful implementation. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(2), 83–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenhuijsen, M. S. (2008). Slachtoffers van misdrijven in het recht en in de victimologie: Verslag van een intellectuele zoektocht [Crime victims in law and victimology: Report of an intellectual search]. Delikt en Delinkwent, 38(2), 121–145.
   Google Scholar
• Groenhuijsen, M. S. (2014). The development of international policy in relation to victims of crime. International Review of Victimology, 20(1), 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchengast, T. (2017). Victimology and victim rights: International comparative perspectives. New York, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klein Haarhuis, C. M., & Niemeijer, E. (2009). Synthesizing legislative evaluations: Putting the pieces together. Evaluation, 15(4), 403–425.
   Google Scholar
• Kunst, M., Popelier, L., & Varekamp, E. (2015). Victim satisfaction with the criminal justice system and emotional recovery: A systematic and critical review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(3), 336–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunst, M., Winkel, F. W., & Bogaerts, S. (2011). Recalled peritraumatic reactions, self-reported PTSD, and the impact of malingering and fantasy proneness in victims of interpersonal violence who have applied for state compensation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(11), 2186–2210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunst, M. J. J. (2015). De therapeutische werking van slachtofferdeelname aan het strafproces [The therapeutic impact of victim participation in criminal proceedings]. Beleid en Maatschappij, 42(1), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kunst, M. J. J., & Koster, N. N. (2017). Psychological distress following crime victimisation: An exploratory study from an agency perspective. Stress and Health, 33(4), 405–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunst, M. J. J., Rutten, S., & Knijf, E. (2013). Satisfaction with the initial police response and development of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in victims of domestic burglary. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26(1), 111–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunst, M. J. J., Van Dijk, J. J. M., Pemberton, A., & Bruinsma, M. Y. (2008). Preventie van herhaald slachtofferschap: Een research synthese van maatregelen ter voorkoming van herhaling [Prevention of repeat victimisation: A research synthesis]. Oisterwijk/ Nijmegen,The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/1552b_volledige_tekst_tcm28-69695.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kunst, M. J. J., & Winkel, F. W. (2015). PTSD symptom reporting and persistent malingering in recipients of state compensation for violent crime victimization: An exploratory study. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26(3), 309–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauritsen, J. L. (2010). Advances and challenges in empirical studies of victimisation. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 501–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauritsen, J. L., & Archakova, E. (2008). Advancing the usefulness of research for victims of crime. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(2), 92–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritsen, J.L. (2006). Assessing problematic research: How can academic researchers help improve the quality of anti-crime programme evaluations? Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2(3), 363–373.
   Google Scholar
• Laxminarayan, M., Bosmans, M., Porter, R., & Sosa, L. (2013). Victim satisfaction with criminal justice: A systematic review. Victims & Offenders, 8(2), 119–147.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw, F., & Schmeets, H. (2016). Empirical legal research: A guidance book for lawyers, legislators and regulators. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw, F. L. (2003). Reconstructing programme theories: Methods available and problems to be solved. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1), 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehner-Zimmerer, M. (2011). Future challenges of international victimology. African Journal of Criminology & Justice Studies, 4(2), 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lens, K. M., Pemberton, A., Brans, K., Braeken, J., Bogaerts, S., & Lahlah, E. (2015). Delivering a victim impact statement: Emotionally effective or counter-productive? European Journal of Criminology, 12(1), 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, K. M. E., Pemberton, A., & Groenhuijsen, M. S. (2010). Het spreekrecht in Nederland: Een bijdrage aan het emotioneel herstel van slachtoffers? [Victim impact statement delivery in the Netherlands: Contributing to crime victims’emotional recovery?]. Tilburg, the Netherlands: INTERVICT/PrismaPrint. Retrieved from https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/volledige-tekst_tcm28-70206.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterise effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-based Research, Policy, and Practice, 4(2), 124–147.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, T., Shannon, L., Walker, R., & Faragher, T. M. (2006). Protective orders: Questions and conundrums. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 7(3), 175–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahood, Q., Van Eerd, D., & Irvin, E. (2014). Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: Challenges and benefits. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(3), 221–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montada, L. (1994). Injustice in harm and loss. Social Justice Research, 7(1), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Muraya, D. N., & Fry, D. (2016). Aftercare services for child victims of sex trafficking: A systematic review of policy and practice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(2), 204–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nas, C. N., Van Ooyen-Houben, M. M. J., & Wieman, J. (2011). Interventies in uitvoering: Wat er mis kan gaan bij de uitvoering van justitiële (gedrags-)interventies en hoe dat komt [Interventions in practice: What can go wrong in the execution of judicial (behavioral) interventions and how does that happen]. The Hague, The Netherlands: WODC. Retrieved from https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/memorandum-2011-2-volledige-tekst_tcm28-78183.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2002a). Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation, 8(2), 157–181.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2002b). Evidence-based policy: The promise of ‘Realist synthesis’. Evaluation, 8(3), 340–358.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. Los Angeles, CA and London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review: A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 21–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2004). Realist evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, B. (2017). Victim law: The law of victims of crime in Canada. Toronto, Canada: Carswell.
   Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J. G., & Baxter, P. M. (2009). Using reference databases. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 73–101). New York, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimé, B., Kanyangara, P., Yzerbyt, V., & Paez, D. (2011). The impact of Gacaca tribunals in Rwanda: Psychosocial effects of participation in a truth and reconciliation process after a genocide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6), 695–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, B. (2012). Effectiveness, victim safety, characteristics, and enforcement of protective orders. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 531–552.
   Google Scholar
• Sebba, L. (2001). On the relationship between criminological research and policy. Criminal Justice, 1(1), 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/works/
   Google Scholar
• Sigfridsson, A. (2011). The crime victim fund in Sweden, funding for victim projects. In A. Kinnunen (Ed.), The position of victims of crime in the Nordic countries (pp. 55–60). Reykjavik, Iceland: The Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology/University of Iceland. Retrieved from http://www.nsfk.org/Portals/0/Archive/Rapport%20fra%20NSfKs%2025.%20kontaktseminar.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Song, F., Parekh, S., Hooper, L., Loke, Y. K., Ryder, J., Sutton, A. J., … Harvey, I. (2010). Dissemination and publication of research findings: An updated review of related biases. Health Technology Assessessment, 14. Retrieved from https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta14080/#/abstract
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, C. H. D. (1990). Hulp aan slachtoffers van ernstige geweldsmisdrijven [Helping victims of severe violent crimes]. Onderzoek en Beleid, 98. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Gouda Quint. Retrieved from https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/ob098-volledige-tekst_tcm28-78521.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tobolowsky, P. M., Beloof, D. E., Gaboury, M. T., Jackson, A. L., & Blackburn, A. G. (2016). Crime victim rights and remedies (3rd ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Aa, S., Van Merriënboer, R., Pemberton, A., Lázaro, J., Rasquete, C., Amaral, C., … Pita, M. (2009). Project victims in Europe: Implementation of the EU framework decision on the standing of victims in the criminal proceedings in the member states of the European Union. Lisbon, Portugal: Associação Portuguesa de Apoio à Vítima. Retrieved from https://apav.pt/apav_v3/images/pdf_english/reportVinE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van der Knaap, L. M., Leeuw, F. L., & Bogaerts, S. (2008). Combining campbell standards and the realist evaluation approach: The best of two worlds? American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Knaap, L. M., Nijssen, L. T. J., & Bogaerts, S. (2006). Geweld verslagen? Een studie naar de preventie van geweld in het publieke en semi-publieke domein [Violence defied? A review of prevention of violence in the public and semi-public domain]. Organisatie & Beleid, 239. Meppel, The Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers. Retrieved from https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/ob239-volledige-tekst_tcm28-68524.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Emmerik, A. P., Kamphuis, J. H., Hulsbosch, A. M., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2002). Single session debriefing after psychological trauma: A meta-analysis. The Lancet, 360(9335), 766–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ooyen-Houben, M., Nas, C. N., & Mulder, J. (2011). What works en what goes wrong? Over evidence- based beleid in de dagelijkse praktijk [What works and what goes wrong? About evidence- based policy in daily practice]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 37(5), 64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ooyen-Houben, M. M. J., & Leeuw, F. L. (2010). Evaluatie van justitiële (beleids-)interventies [Evaluation of judicial (policy) interventions]. The Hague, The Netherlands: WODC. Retrieved from https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/memorandum2010-2-volledige-tekst-nieuw_tcm28-78177.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waller, I. (2010). Rights for victims of crime. Rebalancing justice. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wartna, B. S. J. (2005). Evaluatie van daderprogramma’s: Een wegwijzer voor onderzoek naar de effecten van strafrechtelijke interventies speciaal gericht op het terugdringen van recidive [Evaluation of offender programmes: A research guide for studying the effectiveness of judicial interventions specifically aiming for a reduction in recidivism]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Boom Juridische uitgevers. Retrieved from https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/OV%202005-01_volledige%20tekst_tcm28-236517.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wedlock, E., & Tapley, J. D. (2016). What works in supporting victims of crime: A rapid evidence assessment. Portsmouth, UK: University of Portsmouth. Retrieved from https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/files/3695582/What_works_in_supporting_victims_of_crime.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wemmers, J. (2013). Victims’ experiences in the criminal justice system and their recovery from crime. International Review of Victimology, 19(3), 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & Ross, S. (2015). Crime, victims and policy: International contexts, local experiences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Stein, J. (2004). The history of the crime victims’ movement in the United States. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programmes, Office for Victims of Crime. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/ncvrw/2005/pdf/historyofcrime.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zeilstra, M. I., & Van Andel, H. G. (1990). Informatieverschaffing en schadebemiddeling door de politie: Evaluatie-onderzoek van een experiment bij slachtoffers van misdrijven in Alkmaar en Eindhoven [Information provision and mediation by the police: Evaluation of an experiment carried out among crime victims in Alkmaar and Eindhoven]. Onderzoek en Beleid, 101. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Gouda Quint. Retrieved from https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/OB101_volledige%20tekst_tcm28-236479.pdf
   Google Scholar