Clinical Implications of Internet Infidelity: Where Facebook Fits In

REFERENCES

• Bergner, R.M., & Bridges, A.J. (2002). The significance of heavy pornography involvement for romantic partners: Research and clinical implications. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 28(3), 193–206. doi:10.1080/009262327603-28235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, A.J., Bergner, R.M., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (2003) Romantic partners’ use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex & Martial Therapy, 29, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. (1998). The Internet and sexuality: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 187–193. doi:10.1089/pb.1998.1.187
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., & Griffin-Shelley, E. (2002). Introduction. The Internet: The next sexual revolution. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians (pp. 5–29). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cravens, J.D. (2013). Social networking infidelity: Understanding the impact and exploring rules and boundaries in intimate partner relationships . (Doctoral dissertation). Lubbock: Texas Tech University.
   Google Scholar
• Cravens, J.D., Leckie, K.R., & Whiting, J.B. (2013). Facebook & infidelity: When poking becomes problematic. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 74–90. doi:10.1007/s1059101209231-5
   Google Scholar
• Cravens, J.D., & Whiting, J.B. (2014). Facebook infidelity: A story completion method. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Daines, B. (2006). Violations of agreed and implicit sexual and emotional boundaries in couple relationships - some thoughts arising from Levine's ‘A clinical perspective on couple infidelity.’ Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 21, 45–53. doi:10.1080/14681990500430011
   Google Scholar
• Glass, S.P., & Wright, T.L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 361–387. doi:10.1080/00224499209551654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E.J., & Whitty, M.T. (2010). Netiquette within married couples: Agreement about acceptable online behavior and surveillance between partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 916–926. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henline, B.H., & Lamke, L.K. (2003, . November 19–22). The experience of sexual and emotional online infidelity. Poster presented at the 65th annual conference of the National Conference on Family Relations, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Henline, B.H., Lamke, L.K., & Howard, M.D. (2007). Exploring perceptions of online infidelity. Personal Relationships, 14, 113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K.M., & Piercy, F.P. (2006). Internet infidelity: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 14, 366–371. doi:10.1177/1066480706290508
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K.M., & Piercy, F.P. (2008). Therapists’ assessment and treatment of Internet infidelity cases. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34, 481–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K.M., & Stevenson, A. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 207–230.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.E. (1972). Attitudes toward extramarital relationships. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 6, 168–191.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K.E., & Hertlein, K.M. (2012). Four key dimensions for distinguishing Internet infidelity from Internet and sex addiction: Concepts and clinical application. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 40(2), 115–125. doi:10.1080/01926187.2011.600677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, S. (1999). The impact of compulsive sexual behaviors on clergy marriages: Perspectives and concerns of the pastor's wife. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 10, 193–199. doi:10.1080/107201603902306307
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C., & Powell, D. (1995). Engendering infidelity: Essentialist and social constructionist readings of a story completion task. Feminism and Psychology, 5, 345–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, S.K., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiblum, S.R., & Döring, N. (2002). Internet sexuality: Known risks and fresh chances for women. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians (pp. 19–45). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, S. (2012, . May 24). Can Facebook ruin your marriage? ABC World News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/facebookrelationshipstatus/story?i=16406245#.T8e02 9PE
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A.M. (2011). Internet boundaries for social networking: Impact of trust and satisfaction (. Master's thesis). Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, B., Cavanaugh, L.E., & Kennedy, D.R. (1988). Dating infidelity: Behaviors, reasons, and consequences. Adolescence, 23, 35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J.P. (2000). A qualitative study of cybersex participants: Gender differences, recovery issues, and implications for therapists. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 249–278.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Segall, L., & Cowley, S. (2012, . October 4). Facebook reaches one billion users. CNNMoney. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2012/10/04/technology/facebookbillion-users/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A.P. (1983). Extramarital sex: A review of the research literature. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, M.T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men's and women's attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 6, 569–579. doi:10.1089/109493103322725342
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitty, M.T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men's and women's representations of unfaithful Internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 57–67. doi:10.1177/0894439304271536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, L.L., Roloff, M.E., & Carey, C.M. (1998). Boundary rules: Factors that inhibit expressing concerns about another's romantic relationship. Communication Research, 25, 618–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarab, P.E., Sensibaugh, C.C., & Rice Allgeier, E. (1998). More than just sex: Gender differences in the incidence of self-defined unfaithful behavior in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 10, 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K. (1998). Caught in the Net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction and achieving strategies for recovery. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Zitzman, S.T., & Butler, M.H. (2005). Attachment, addiction, and recovery: Conjoint marital therapy for recovery from a sexual addiction. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 12, 311–337.
   Google Scholar