CFD-PBM approach for the gas-liquid flow in a nanobubble generator with honeycomb structure

References

• Fukushi, K.; Matsui, Y.; Tambo, N. Dissolved Air Flotation: Experiments and Kinetic Analysis. J. Water. SRT-Aqua. 1998, 47, 76–86.
   Google Scholar
• Onari, H.; Saga, T.; Watanabe, K.; Maeda, K.; Matsuo, K. High Functional Characteristics of Micro-Bubbles and Water Purification. Resour. Process. 1999, 46, 238–244. DOI:10.4144/rpsj1986.46.238
   Google Scholar
• Kakuta, I. Effective Utilization of Micro- and Nano-Bubble Technology on Environmental Improvement, Promotion of Health and Growth Rate of Organisms, Food Safety, and Medical Therapy. Bull. Soc. Sea Water Sci. Jpn. 2006, 60, 160–163. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Tusge, H. Fundamentals of Microbubbles and Nanobubbles. Bull. Soc. Sea Water Sci. Jpn. 2010, 64, 4–10. (in Japanese)
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, M. Fundamental Properties and Technical Applications of Microbubbles. Presented at 2nd International Symposium on Application of High-voltage, Plasmas & Micro/Nano Bubbles to Agriculture and Aquaculture, Chiang Mai, Thailand, July 26, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Michioku, K.; Kanda, T.; Ohnari, H.; Nishikawa, T.; Matsuo, K.; Kido, T. A Preliminary Experiment on Reservoir Water Purification by Using a Micro-Bubble Aeration System. Proc. Hydraul. Eng. 2000, 44, 1119–1124. (in Japanese) DOI:10.2208/prohe.44.1119
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, H.; Masaki, Y.; Matsuuchi, K.; Yoshida, Y. Micro-Bubble Generation by Using Pipe with Slits. Trans. JSMET. 2006, 72, 2242–2248. DOI:10.1299/kikaib.72.2242
   Google Scholar
• Hiraki, K. Efficient Long Term Storage Technology of Seafood Using Nitrogen Nanobubbles. Latest Technol. Microbubbles NTS Inc. 2014, 2, 177–183. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Tusge, H. The latest technology on microbubbles and nanobubbles II; CMC Publishing Co.,Ltd: Frankfurt, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sadatomi, M.; Kawahara, A.; Kano, K.; Ohtomo, A. Performance of a New Micro-Bubble Generator with a Spherical Body in a Flowing Water Tube. Exp. Therm. Fluid. Sci. 2005, 29, 615–623. DOI:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2004.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo, Y.; Hiraki, K. Characteristics Comparison of the Honeycomb Mixing Device by considering the Mixing Energy in the Gas-Liquid Mixing. Proc. Symp. Micro-Nano Sci. Technol. 2011, 3, 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Noda, N.-A.; Ren, F.; Yamamoto, W.; Ueda, T.; Sano, Y.; Chen, D.-H.; Takase, Y.; Yonezawa, Y. Design and Performance of Honeycomb Structure for Nanobubbles Generating Apparatus. J. Jpn. Soc. Des. Eng. 2018, 53, 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, X.-F.; Pan, H.; Su, Y.-H.; Luo, Z.-H. CFD-PBM Approach with Modified Drag Model for the Gas–Liquid Flow in a Bubble Column. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2016, 112, 88–102. DOI:10.1016/j.cherd.2016.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delnoij, E.; Lammers, F.; Kuipers, J.; Van Swaaij, W. Dynamic Simulation of Dispersed Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Using a Discrete Bubble Model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1997, 52, 1429–1458. DOI:10.1016/S0009-2509(96)00515-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolichin, A.; Eigenberger, G.; Lapin, A.; Lübert, A. Dynamic Numerical Simulation of Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flows Euler/Euler versus Euler/Lagrange. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1997, 52, 611–626. DOI:10.1016/S0009-2509(96)00425-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, D. Mathematical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1983, 15, 261–291. DOI:10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.001401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, R.; Urseanu, M.-I.; Van Baten, J.-M.; Ellenberger, J. Influence of Scale on the Hydrodynamics of Bubble Columns Operating in the Churn-Turbulent Regime: Experiments Vs. Eulerian Simulations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54, 4903–4911. DOI:10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00211-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T.-F.; Wang, J.-F.; Jin, Y. Population Balance Model for Gas − Liquid Flows: Influence of Bubble Coalescence and Breakup Models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 7540–7549. DOI:10.1021/ie0489002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L.-M.; Liu, Z.-Q.; Li, B.-K.; Matsuura, H.; Tsukihashi, F. Water Model and CFD-PBM Coupled Model of Gas-Liquid-Slag Three-Phase Flow in Ladle Metallurgy. ISIJ. Int. 2015, 55, 1337–1346. DOI:10.2355/isijinternational.55.1337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, X.-Y.; Cheung, S. C. P.; Yeoh, G.-H.; Tu, J.-Y.; Krepper, E.; Lucas, D. Gas–Liquid Flows in Medium and Large Vertical Pipes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66, 872–883. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2010.11.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T.; Wang, J. Numerical Simulations of Gas–Liquid Mass Transfer in Bubble Columns with a CFD–PBM Coupled Model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62, 7107–7118. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2007.08.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Jin, Y. A CFD-PBM Coupled Model for Gas–Liquid Flows. AIChE J. 2006, 52, 125–140. DOI:10.1002/aic.10611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, C.; Wang, T.; Wang, J. Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation with a Coupled CFD–PBM Model of the Effect of Liquid Viscosity in a Bubble Column. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 95, 313–322. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2013.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhan, A.-R.; Naser, J.; Brooks, G. CFD Simulation on Influence of Suspended Solid Particles on Bubbles’ Coalescence Rate in Flotation Cell. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 146, 54–64. DOI:10.1016/j.minpro.2015.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhan, A.-R.; Naser, J.; Brooks, G. CFD Analysis of Solid Particles Properties Effect in Three-Phase Flotation Column. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 185, 1–9. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.04.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhan, A.-R.; Naser, J.; Brooks, G. Effects of Particle Size and Concentration on Bubble Coalescence and Froth Formation in a Slurry Bubble Column. Particuology 2018, 36, 82–95. DOI:10.1016/j.partic.2017.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhan, A.-R.; Naser, J.; Brooks, G. Bubbly Flow with Particle Attachment and Detachment – A Multi-Phase CFD Study. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2018, 53, 181–197. DOI:10.1080/01496395.2017.1375525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, L.; Naumann, A. A Drag Coefficient Correlation. Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing. 1935, 77, 318–320.
   Google Scholar
• Takamasa, T.; Tomiyama, A. Three-Dimensional Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Bubbly Flow in a C-Shaped Tube. Presented at the 9th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, San Francisco, CA, Oct. 3, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Tomiyama, A.; Shimada, N. A Numerical Method for Bubbly Flow Simulation Based on a Multi-Fluid Model. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2001, 123, 510–516. DOI:10.1115/1.1388010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomiyama, A.; Tamai, H.; Zun, I.; Hosokawa, S. Transverse Migration of Single Bubbles in Simple Shear Flows. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 1849–1858. DOI:10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00085-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, T.; Zwart, P.-J.; Krepper, E.; Prasser, H.-M.; Lucas, D. Validation of CFD Models for Mono- and Polydisperse Air–Water Two-Phase Flows in Pipes. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2008, 238, 647–659. DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laborde-Boutet, C.; Larachi, F.; Dromard, N.; Delsart, O.; Schweich, D. CFD Simulation of Bubble Column Flows: Investigations on Turbulence Models in RANS Approach. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64, 4399–4413. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2009.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakhot, V.; Orszag, S.-A.; Thangam, S.; Gatski, T.-B.; Speziale, C.-G. Development of Turbulence Models for Shear Flows by a Double Expansion Technique. Phys. Fluids. A 1992, 4, 1510–1520. DOI:10.1063/1.858424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, Y.; Sekoguchi, K. Liquid Velocity Distribution in Two-Phase Bubble Flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 1975, 2, 79–95. DOI:10.1016/0301-9322(75)90030-0
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS. ANSYS Fluent 16.2 Documentation. ANSYS Inc., 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, H.; Svendsen, H.-F. Theoretical Model for Drop and Bubble Breakup in Turbulent Dispersions. AIChE J. 1996, 42, 1225–1233. DOI:10.1002/aic.690420505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffman, P.-G.; Turner, J.-S. On the Collision of Droplets in Turbulent Clouds. J. Fluid Mech. 1956, 1, 16–30. DOI:10.1017/S0022112056000020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, J. Collision Rates of Small Particles in a Vigorously Turbulent Fluid. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1975, 30, 1371–1379. DOI:10.1016/0009-2509(75)85067-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashitani, K.; Yamauchi, K.; Matsuno, Y.; Hosokawa, G. Turbulent Coagulation of Particles Dispersed in a Viscous Fluid. J. Chem. Eng. Japan. 1983, 16, 299–304. DOI:10.1252/jcej.16.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagesaether, L.; Jakobsen, H.-A.; Svendsen, H.-F. A Model for Turbulent Binary Breakup of Dispersed Fluid Particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 3251–3267. DOI:10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00197-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, A.; Carr, B. Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2006, 23, 197–204. DOI:10.1002/ppsc.200601031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipe, V.; Hawe, A.; Jiskoot, W. Critical Evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the Measurement of Nanoparticles and Protein Aggregates. Pharm. Res. 2010, 27, 796–810. DOI:10.1007/s11095-010-0073-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov, A.-N. On the Breakage of Drops in a Turbulent Flow. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 1949, 66, 825–828.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G.-M.; Jameson, G.-J.; Atkinson, B.-W. Prediction of the Bubble Size Generated by a Plunging Liquid Jet Bubble Column. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1992, 47, 3265–3272. DOI:10.1016/0009-2509(92)85034-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar