Experimental investigation on the stability of foam using combination of anionic and zwitterionic surfactants: A screening scenario to obtain optimum compound

References

• Tang, J.; Ansari, M. N.; Rossen, W. R. Quantitative Modeling of the Effect of Oil on Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPEJ. 2019, 24, 1057–1075. DOI: 10.2118/194020-PA.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, H. R.; Mohammadi, S.; Mirzaei Derazi, A.; Moradi, S.; Mahmoudi Alemi, F.; Hamed Mahvelati, E.; Fouladi Hossein Abad, K. A Comprehensive Review on Critical Affecting Parameters on Foam Stability and Recent Advancements for Foam-Based EOR Scenario. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 116808. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davarpanah, A. A Feasible Visual Investigation for Associative Foam>⧹Polymer Injectivity Performances in the Oil Recovery Enhancement. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 105, 405–411. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcorn, Z. P.; Fredriksen, S. B.; Sharma, M.; Fernø, M. A.; Graue, A. CO2 Foam EOR Field Pilot-Pilot Design, Geologic and Reservoir Modeling, and Laboratory Investigations. IOR 2017 – 19th European Sympo. Improved Oil Recovery. 2017, 2017, 1–20. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201700240.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mudhafar, W. J.; Al-Maliki, A. K.; Al-Tameemi, A.; Al-Attar, A.; Al-Ameri, R. H.; Hosseini-Nasab, S. M. Field-Scale Evaluation of Re-Injecting the Associated Gas to Enhance the Recovery of Oil through the GAGD Process: A Prospective Pilot Project in a Southern Iraqi Oil Field. SPE EOR Conference Oil and Gas West Asia, 2018, DOI: 10.2118/190355-MS.
   Google Scholar
• Rabbani, S.; Abderrahmane, H.; Sassi, M. Investigation of Enhanced Oil Recovery with the Upscaled Three Phase Flow Model in an Oil Reservoir. SPE Gas & Oil Technology Showcase Conference Dubai, UAE, 2019. DOI: 10.2118/198575-MS.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W.; Lee, S.; Izadi, M.; Kam, S. I. Dimensionality-Dependent Foam Rheological Properties: How to Go from Linear to Radial Geometry for Foam Modeling and Simulation. SPEJ. 2016, 21, 1669–1687. DOI: 10.2118/175015-PA.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skauge, A.; Solbakken, J.; Ormehaug, P. A.; Aarra, M. G. Foam Generation, Propagation and Stability in Porous Medium. Transp. Porous Med. 2020, 131, 5–21. DOI: 10.1007/s11242-019-01250-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirasaki, G. J.; Lawson, J. B. Mechanisms of Foam Flow in Porous Media: Apparent Viscosity in Smooth Capillaries. SPE J. 1985, 25, 176–190. DOI: 10.2118/12129-PA.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, F.; Chen, W. H.; Gauglitz, P. A. Experimental and Simulation Study of High-Temperature Foam Displacement in Porous Media. SPE Res. Eng. 1991, 6, 37–45. DOI: 10.2118/17357-PA.
   Google Scholar
• Abbaszadeh, M.; Varavei, A.; Rodríguez Garza, F.; Pino, A. E.; Salinas, J. L.; Puerto, M. C.; Hirasaki, G. J.; Miller, C. A. Methodology for the Development of Laboratory–Based Comprehensive Foam Model for Use in the Reservoir Simulation of Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE Res. Eval. Eng. 2018, 21, 344–363. DOI: 10.2118/181732-PA.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimstad, A. A.; Bergmo, P. E. S.; Barrabino, A.; Holt, T. Modelling of CO2-Foam Core Flooding Experiments. Proceedings of the 15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference. 2021; pp 15–18. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3816402.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari, M.; Cao, S. C.; Jung, J. Geological CO2 Sequestration in Saline Aquifers: Implication on Potential Solutions of China’s Power Sector. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 121, 137–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enick, R. M.; Olsen, D.; Ammer, J.; Schuller, W. Mobility and Conformance Control for CO2 EOR via Thickeners, Foams, and Gels – A Literature Review of 40 Years of Research and Pilot Tests. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 2012. DOI: 10.2118/154122-MS.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, K.; Ren, G.; Mateen, K.; Morel, D.; Cordelier, P. Modeling Techniques for Foam Flow in Porous Media. SPE J. 2015, 20, 453–470. DOI: 10.2118/169104-PA.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattanaudom, P.; Shiau, B. J.; Suriyapraphadilok, U.; Charoensaeng, A. Effect of pH on Silica Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Carboxylate-Based Extended Surfactants. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2021, 196, 107729. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauglitz, P.; Friedmann, F.; Kam, S.; Rossen, W. Foam Generation in Homogeneous Porous Media. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 4037–4052. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00340-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, V. Forces and Structure in Thin Liquid Soap Films. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 1999, 11, R215–R238. DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/11/19/201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelachvili, J. N.; Wennerstroem, H. Entropic Forces between Amphiphilic Surfaces in Liquids. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 520–531. DOI: 10.1021/j100181a007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Q.; Zhou, Z.-H.; Xiao, C.-M.; Gao, M.; Han, L.; Liu, Q.-C.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, L. The Synergism of Improving Interfacial Properties between Betaine and Crude Oil for Enhanced Oil Recovery. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 383, 122046. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, S.; Shahmardan, M.; Nazari, M.; Norouzi, M. Experimental Study of the Effects of Surfactant Material and Hydrocarbon Agent on Foam Stability with the Approach of Enhanced Oil Recovery. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2020, 585, 124047. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokrollahi, A.; Ghazanfari, M. H.; Badakhshan, A. Application of Foam Floods for Enhancing Heavy Oil Recovery through Stability Analysis and Core Flood Experiments. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 92, 1975–1987. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, T. N.; Pugh, R. J.; Franks, G. V.; Jameson, G. J. The Role of Particles in Stabilising Foams and Emulsions. Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2008, 137, 57–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2007.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q.; Qu, H.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Peng, B.; Luo, D. Modified Fe3O4 Nanoparticle Used for Stabilizing Foam Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2020, 605, 125383. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J.; Torabi, F.; Yang, J. The Synergistic Role of Silica Nanoparticle and Anionic Surfactant on the Static and Dynamic CO2 Foam Stability for Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery: An Experimental Study. Fuel. 2021, 287, 119443. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qajar, A.; Xue, Z.; Worthen, A. J.; Johnston, K. P.; Huh, C.; Bryant, S. L.; Prodanović, M. Modeling Fracture Propagation and Cleanup for Dry Nanoparticle-Stabilized-Foam Fracturing Fluids. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2016, 146, 210–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.; Mandal, A. Investigation on Stabilization of CO2 Foam by Ionic and Nonionic Surfactants in Presence of Different Additives for Application in Enhanced Oil Recovery. App. Surf. Sci. 2017, 420, 9–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, D.; Izadi, M.; Kam, S. I. Modeling of Nanoparticle-Stabilized CO2 Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE. Res. Eval. Eng. 2019, 22, 971–989. DOI: 10.2118/194018-PA.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zargartalebi, M.; Kharrat, R.; Barati, N. Enhancement of Surfactant Flooding Performance by the Use of Silica Nanoparticles. Fuel. 2015, 143, 21–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, H. R.; Mohammadi, S.; Derazi, A. M.; Alemi, F. M. Enhancement of Smart Water-Based Foam Characteristics by SiO2 Nanoparticles for EOR Applications. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2021, 627, 127143. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafati, R.; Oludara, O. K.; Sharifi Haddad, A.; Hamidi, H. Experimental Investigation of Emulsified Oil Dispersion on Bulk Foam Stability. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2018, 554, 110–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.06.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashir, A.; Sharifi Haddad, A.; Rafati, R. Nanoparticle/Polymer-Enhanced Alpha Olefin Sulfonate Solution for Foam Generation in the Presence of Oil Phase at High Temperature Conditions. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2019, 582, 123875. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manan, M.; Farad, S.; Piroozian, A.; Esmail, M. Effects of Nanoparticle Types on Carbon Dioxide Foam Flooding in Enhanced Oil Recovery. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2015, 33, 1286–1294. DOI: 10.1080/10916466.2015.1057593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harati, S.; Bayat, A. E.; Sarvestani, M. T. Assessing the Effects of Different Gas Types on Stability of SiO2 Nanoparticle Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery Purpose. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 313, 113521. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manlowe, D. J.; Radke, C. J. A Pore-Level Investigation of Foam/Oil Interactions in Porous Media. SPE. Res. Eng. 1990, 5, 495–502. DOI: 10.2118/18069-PA.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, C.; Wang, J.; Yin, H.; Lu, G.; Li, Z.; Feng, F. Condensate Oil-Tolerant Foams Stabilized by an Anionic–Sulfobetaine Surfactant Mixture. ACS Omega. 2019, 4, 1738–1747. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Sun, S.; Hu, S. Study on the Influence of the External Conditions and Internal Components on Foam Performance in Gas Recovery. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021, 231, 116279. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roncoroni, M.; Romero, P.; Montes, J.; Bascialla, G.; Rodríguez, R.; Pons-Esparver, R. R.; Mazadiego, L. F.; García-Mayoral, M. F. Enhancement of a Foaming Formulation with a Zwitterionic Surfactant for Gas Mobility Control in Harsh Reservoir Conditions. Pet. Sci. 2021, 18, 1409–1426. DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2021.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhu, H.; Sun, S.; Hu, S. Temperature and Salt Resistant CO2 Responsive Gas Well Foam: Experimental and Molecular Simulation Study. App. Surf. Sci. 2022, 594, 153431. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153431.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Z.; Dexin, L.; Yue, L.; Lulu, L.; Jie, Y. Synergistic Effects between Anionic and Amphoteric Surfactants on Promoting Spontaneous Imbibition in Ultra-Low Permeability Reservoirs: Study of Mechanism and Formula Construction. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2021, 625, 126930. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendleton, N. S.; Smith, C. D. Foamers for Unloading High-Condensate Gas Wells. Patent US20160040056A1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Danov, K. D.; Kralchevska, S. D.; Kralchevsky, P. A.; Ananthapadmanabhan, K. P.; Lips, A. Mixed Solutions of Anionic and Zwitterionic Surfactant (Betaine): Surface-Tension Isotherms, Adsorption, and Relaxation Kinetics. Langmuir. 2004, 20, 5445–5453. DOI: 10.1021/la049576i.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basheva, E. S.; Ganchev, D.; Denkov, N. D.; Kasuga, K.; Satoh, N.; Tsujii, K. Role of Betaine as Foam Booster in the Presence of Silicone Oil Drops. Langmuir. 2000, 16, 1000–1013. DOI: 10.1021/la990777+.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei-Bonsu, K.; Shokri, N.; Grassia, P. Foam Stability in the Presence and Absence of Hydrocarbons: From Bubble-to Bulk-Scale. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2015, 481, 514–526. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrianov, A.; Farajzadeh, R.; Mahmoodi Nick, M.; Talanana, M.; Zitha, P. L. Immiscible Foam for Enhancing Oil Recovery: Bulk and Porous Media Experiments. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 2214–2226. DOI: 10.1021/ie201872v.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z.; Li, Z.; Cui, S.; Li, B.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, L.; Husein, M. M. Assessing the Performance of Foams Stabilized by Anionic/Nonionic Surfactant Mixture under High Temperature and Pressure Conditions. Colloids Surf, A. 2022, 651, 129699. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R. F.; Hirasaki, G. J.; Miller, C. A.; Masalmeh, S. K. Wettability Alteration and Foam Mobility Control in a Layered, 2D Heterogeneous Sandpack. SPE J .2012, 17, 1207–1220. DOI: 10.2118/141462-PA.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farajzadeh, R.; Andrianov, A.; Krastev, R.; Hirasaki, G.; Rossen, W. R. Foam-Oil Interaction in Porous Media: Implications for Foam Assisted Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Oman, 2012. DOI: 10.2118/154197-MS.
   Google Scholar
• Han, W.; Fan, J.; Lv, H.; Yan, Y.; Liu, C.; Dong, S. Excellent Foaming Properties of Anionic-Zwitterionic-Gemini Cationic Compound Surfactants for Gas Well Deliquification: Experimental and Computational Investigations. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2022, 653, 129944. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emami, H.; Ayatizadeh Tanha, A.; Khaksar Manshad, A.; Mohammadi, A. H. Experimental Investigation of Foam Flooding Using Anionic and Nonionic Surfactants: A Screening Scenario to Assess the Effects of Salinity and pH on Foam Stability and Foam Height. ACS Omega. 2022, 7, 14832–14847. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini-Nasab, S.; Douarche, F.; Nabzar, L.; Simjoo, M.; Bourbiaux, B.; Roggero, F. Integrated Method for Numerical Simulation of Foam Flooding in Porous Media in the Absence and Presence of Oil. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Oman, 2018. DOI: 10.2118/190479-MS.
   Google Scholar
• Clogston, J. D.; Patri, A. K. In Characterization of Nanoparticles Intended for Drug Delivery; Scott E. McNeil, Ed. Humana Press: New Jersey, 2011; pp 63–70. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-198-1.
   Google Scholar
• Andrianov, A.; Farajzadeh, R.; Nick, M. M.; Talanana, M.; Zitha, P. L. Immiscible Foam for Enhancing Oil Recovery: Bulk and Porous Media Experiments. SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2011. DOI: 10.2118/143578-MS.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, L.; Wassmuth, F. Foams: Basic Principles. In Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry; L. L. Schramm, Ed. Advances in Chemistry Series: Washington, DC, 1994; pp 3–45. DOI: 10.1021/ba-1994-0242.ch001.
   Google Scholar
• Vikingstad, A. K.; Skauge, A.; Høiland, H.; Aarra, M. Foam–Oil Interactions Analyzed by Static Foam Tests. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2005, 260, 189–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simjoo, M.; Rezaei, T.; Andrianov, A.; Zitha, P. Foam Stability in the Presence of Oil: Effect of Surfactant Concentration and Oil Type. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. 2013, 438, 148–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.05.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzaneh, S. A.; Sohrabi, M. Experimental Investigation of CO2-Foam Stability Improvement by Alkaline in the Presence of Crude Oil. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2015, 94, 375–389. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno, M.; et al. Practical Chemistry of Long-Lasting Bubbles. World. J. Chem. Educ. 2016, 4, 32–44. DOI: 10.12691/wjce-4-2-2.
   Google Scholar
• Panthi, K.; Sotomayor, M.; Balhoff, M. T.; Mohanty, K. K. Low Retention Surfactant-Polymer Process for a HTHS Carbonate Reservoir. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 214, 110516. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirahara, F.; Koshimizu, T.; Suzuki, T.; Ikezawa, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Usui, T. Studies on the Modified Foam Stability Test. Effects of Blood and Meconium and Comparison with Clements’ Shake Test. Diagn. Gynecol. Obstet. 1981, 3, 9–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hadian Nasr, N.; Mahmood, S. M.; Akbari, S.; Hematpur, H. A Comparison of Foam Stability at Varying Salinities and Surfactant Concentrations Using Bulk Foam Tests and Sandpack Flooding. J. Petrol Explor. Prod. Technol. 2020, 10, 271–282. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-019-0707-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutzler, S.; Lösch, D.; Carey, S.; Weaire, D.; Hloucha, M.; Stubenrauch, C. Evaluation of a Steady-State Test of Foam Stability. Philos. Mag. 2011, 91, 537–552. DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2010.526646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar