Global Research Productivity in the Field of Dermatoglyphics: A Quantitative Assessment of 50 Years of Journal Article Output

REFERENCES

• Belinchon, I. 2004. Dermatological scientific production from European Union authors (1987–2000). Scientometrics 61 (2): 271–81. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041652.90675.d6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj, R. K., S. Ram, and S. Kaushik. 2013. Vitiligo: A quantitative analysis of the world research output during 2001–2012. Journal of Scientometric Research 2 (2): 102–09.
   Google Scholar
• Bozhchenko, P. 2007. Dermatoglyphic examinations in the system of personal identification. Forensic Science International 169: S38. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.04.125.
   Google Scholar
• Chariot, P., and M. Durigon. 1994. The impact of forensic science journals. Forensic Science International 66: 213–15. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(94)90346-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, S. 2001. Suspect identities: A history of fingerprinting and criminal identification, 60–61. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, H., and C. Midlo. 1961. Finger prints, palms and soles: An introduction to dermatoglyphics. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, N., and J. Koehler. 1989. Dermatoglyphic indicators of congenital heart defects in Down’s syndrome patients: A preliminary study. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 33 (4): 343–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engert, G. J. 1964. International corner. Identification News, 14 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Everts, S. 2008. Fingerprints reveal drug use. Chemical & Engineering News 86: 34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, E. R. 1900. Classification and uses of finger prints. London: Rutledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. 2007. Does the H-index have predictive power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 19193–98. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707962104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jemec, G. B. E., and H. Nybaek. 2006. A bibliometric study of dermatology in central Europe 1991–2002. International Journal of Dermatology 45 (8): 922–26. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2006.02821.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesubright, J. J., and P. Saravanan. 2014. A scientometric analysis of global forensic science research publications. Library Philosophy and Practice. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1024/ ( accessed August 31, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. W. 1993. The impact of forensic science journals. Forensic Science International 62: 173–78. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(93)90206-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. W. 2003. Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: What do the numbers really mean? Forensic Science International 133: 1–8. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00042-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. W. 2005. Which articles and which topics in the forensic sciences are most highly cited? Science & Justice 45 (4): 175–82. doi:10.1016/S1355-0306(05)71661-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. W. 2007. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor. Forensic Science International 165: 115–28. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katznelson, M. B.-M., and B. Goldman. 1982. Fetal dermatoglyphics. Clinical Genetics 21: 237–42. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.1982.tb00757.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatz, Y., and O. Yoshida. 1976. Finger patterns and ridge counts of patients with Klinefelter’s syndrome (47, XXY) among the Japanese. Human Heredity 26 (4): 290–97. doi:10.1159/000152816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man, H., S. Xin, W. Bi, C. Lv, M. Theodora, P. M. E. Mauro, and M.-Q. Man. 2014. Comparison of publication trends in dermatology among Japan, South Korea and Mainland China. BMC Dermatology 14(1). doi:10.1186/1471-5945-14-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mglinets, V. 1991. Relationship between dermatoglyphic variability and finger length in genetic disorders: Down’s syndrome. Genetika 27 (3): 541–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mimouni, D., L. Pavlovsky, L. Akerman, M. David, and F. B. Mimouni. 2010. Trends in dermatology publications over the past 15 years. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 11 (1): 55–58. doi:10.2165/11530190-000000000-00000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajangam, S., S. Janakiram, and I. Thomas. 1995. Dermatoglyphics in down’s syndrome. Journal of Indian Medical Association 93 (1): 10–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ram, S. 2013. Indian psoriasis research: An impact assessment through bibliometric studies. Journal of Scientometric Research 2 (2): 126–31.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, T., A. Reichmann, and C. Palmer. 1977. Dermatoglyphic differences between 45,X and other chromosomal abnormalities of Turner syndrome. Human Genetics 36 (1): 13–23. doi:10.1007/BF00390431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rott, H., G. Schwanitz, and M. Reither. 1975. Dermatoglyphics in Noonan’s syndrome (author’s transl). Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae ( Roma) 24 (1–2): 63–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvageau, A., S. Desnoyers, and A. Godin. 2009. Mapping the literature in forensic sciences: A bibliometric study of North American journals from 1980 to 2005. The Open Forensic Science Journal 2: 41–46. doi:10.2174/1874402800902010041.
   Google Scholar
• Schaumann, B., and M. Alter. 1976. Dermatoglyphics in medical disorders, 1–59. Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shiono, H. 1986. Dermatoglyphics in medicine. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 7: 120–26. doi:10.1097/00000433-198607020-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzumori, K. 1980. Dermatoglyphic analysis of fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 859–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, G., H. Singh, and P. Ramanujam. 2002. Dermatoglyphic analysis of palmar print of blind children from Bangalore. Journal of Ecotoxicology and Environmental Monitoring 12: 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheim, K., and A. Maceo. 2002. The critical stage of friction ridge pattern formation. Journal of Forensic Identification 52: 35–85.
   Google Scholar