Transcription Activator Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs): A New, Important, and Versatile Gene Editing Technique with a Growing Literature

References

• Barnett, P. 2002. Combinatorial chemistry: A guide for librarians. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 33(Winter). doi: 10.5062/F4DZ0690.
   Google Scholar
• Bonas, U., R. E. Stall, and B. Staskawicz. 1989. Genetic and structural characterization of the avirulence gene avrBs3 from xanthomonas campestris Pv. Vesicatoria. Molecular and General Genetics MGG 218 (1):127–36. doi:10.1007/BF00330575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler, K. 2016. Reviews of science for science librarians: CRISPR-Cas9 revolutionizes gene editing. Science & Technology Libraries 35 (3):221–27. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2016.1208135.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasegaran, S., and D. Carroll. 2016. Origins of programmable nucleases for genome engineering. Journal of Molecular Biology 428 (5):963–89. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.10.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K. January 10, 2017. Dinner is being tweaked. New York Times Sect D:1.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, M., T. Cermak, E. L. Doyle, C. Schmidt, F. Zhang, A. Hummel, A. J. Bogdanove, and D. F. Voytas. 2010. Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics 186 (2):757–61. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.120717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 2017. CRISPR patent ruling leaves license holders scrambling. Science (New York, N.Y.) 355 (6327):786. doi:10.1126/science.355.6327.786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contreras, J. L., and J. S. Sherkow. 2017. CRISPR, surrogate licensing, and scientific discovery. Science (New York, N.Y.) 355 (6326):698–700. doi:10.1126/science.aal4222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R. 2017. CRISPR’s Breakthrough Problem. Chemical & Engineering News 95 (7):28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dever, D. P., R. O. Bak, A. Reinisch, J. Camarena, G. Washigton, C. E. Nicolas, M. Pavel-Dinu, N. Saxena, A. B. Wilkens, and S. Mantri. 2016. CRISPR/Cas9 β-Globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 539 (7629):384–89. doi:10.1038/nature20134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBSCO, Information Services. All Databases. Accessed September 14, 2017. https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhaupt, E. 2012. Engineering genes. Science News (Washington, D. C.) 181 (6):28.
   Google Scholar
• Espacenet. Cooperative patent classification. Accessed September 14, 2017. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/classification.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. S. 2016. Editing the mush room. Scientific American 314 (3):56–63. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0316-56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lascar, C., and L. D. Mendelsohn. 2001. An analysis of journal use by structural biologists with applications for journal collection development decisions. College & Research Libraries 62 (5):422–33. doi:10.5860/crl.62.5.422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, R. J. 2006. A research guide to the federal register and the code of federal regulations. Law Library Lights 46 (1):10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., and M. M. Cox. 2008. Lehninger principles of biochemistry, 5th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Pennisi, E. 2012. The tale of the TALEs. Science (New York, N.Y.) 338 (6113):1408–11. doi:10.1126/science.338.6113.1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennisi, E. 2016a. The plant engineer. Science (New York, N.Y.) 353 (6305):1220–24. doi:10.1126/science.353.6305.1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennisi, E. 2016b. When is GM plant not a GM plant? Science (Washington, DC, United States) 353 (6305):1222. doi:10.1126/science.353.6305.1222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Relyea, H. C. 2011. The federal register: Origins, formulation, realization, and heritage. Government Information Quarterly 28 (3):295–302. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrode, F. G. 1997. Science and patent sessions at online world. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 16(Fall. doi: 10.5062/F4GM859S.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, E. S., and S. M. Kaback. 1996. Patents, literature. In Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, ed. J. I. Kroschwitz and M. Howe-Grant, Vol. 18, 4th ed., 197–252. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan, I., S. Jain, and H. Zhao. 2016. Use of genome-editing tools to treat sickle cell disease. Human Genetics 135 (9):1011–28. doi:10.1007/s00439-016-1688-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa, J. n.d. The web of science journal selection process. Clarivate Analytics. Accessed September 14, 2017. http://wokinfo.com/essays/journal-selection-process/.
   Google Scholar
• UniProtKB. P69905 (HBA_HUMAN). Accessed September 14, 2017. http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P69905.
   Google Scholar
• Weisgerber, D. W. 1997. Chemical abstracts service chemical registry system: History, scope, and impacts. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 48 (4):349–60. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199704)48:4<349::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property, Organization. Patentscope. Accessed August 8, 2017.https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/structuredSearch.jsf.
   Google Scholar