Baseline Assessment: Understanding WISE Freshman Students’ Information Literacy Skills in a One-shot Library Session

References

• ACRL. 2018. Information literacy standards for science and engineering/technology. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/infolitscitech
   Google Scholar
• Assanis, D. 2012. University Senate: Sixth annual women in science and engineering banquet. Retrieved from http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/univ-senate/reports/_prov/prov-05-07-12
   Google Scholar
• Boger, T. S., H. Dybvik, A.-L. Eng, and E. H. Norheim. 2015. The impact of library information literacy classes on first-year undergraduate students’ search behaviour. Journal of Information Literacy 9 (1):34–46. doi:10.11645/9.1.1979.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet, J. L., and B. McAlexander. 2012. Structural diversity in academic libraries: A study of librarian approachability. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 38 (5):277–86. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2012.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, J. E., and E. Karshmer. 2013. Assessment in the one-shot session: Using pre-and post-tests to measure innovative instructional strategies among first-year students. College & Research Libraries 74 (6):574–86. doi:10.5860/crl12-369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California State University, Chico, Meriam Library. 2010. CRAAP. Retrieved from https://www.csuchico.edu/lins/handouts/eval_websites.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conway, A. 2015. One-shot library instruction sessions may not increase student use of academic journals or diversity of sources. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 10 (4):238–40. doi:10.18438/B8SS3Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauterive, S., J. Bourgeois, and S. Simms. 2017. How little is too little? An examination of information literacy instruction duration for freshmen. Journal of Information Literacy 11 (1):204–19. doi:10.11645/11.1.2161.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, M. R., R. M. Murphey, and K. Rogers. 2011. Assessing information literacy comprehension in first-year students. Practical Academic Librarianship: the International Journal of the SLA Academic Division 1 (1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, C. M., and N. Verishagen. 2015. Applying Kolb’s learning theory to library instruction: An observational study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 10 (4):186–99. doi:10.18438/B8S892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, K., T. Nicholas, T. Hayes, and C. W. Appelt. 2014. Evaluating one-shot library sessions: Impact on the quality and diversity of student source use. Community & Junior College Libraries 20 (1–2):27–38. doi:10.1080/02763915.2014.1009749.
   Google Scholar
• Hufford, J. R. 2013. A review of the literature on assessment in academic and research libraries, 2005 to August 2011. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 13 (1):5–35. doi:10.1353/pla.2013.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H. L. M., and D. Jacobs. 2009. Transforming the one-shot library session into pedagogical collaboration: Information literacy and the English composition class. Reference & User Services Quarterly 49 (1):72–82. doi:10.5860/rusq.49n1.72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, B. F. 2008. Revitalizing the one-shot instruction session using problem-based learning. Reference & User Services Quarterly 47 (4):386–91. doi:10.5860/rusq.47n4.386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebst, A., and D. Feinmark. 2016. Tools of academic library assessment: The user survey. Journal of Library Administration 56 (6):748–55. doi:10.1080/01930826.2016.1199144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massis, B. E. 2011. Information literacy instruction in the library: Now more than ever. New Library World 112 (5/6):274–77. doi:10.1108/03074801111136301.
   Google Scholar
• Mery, Y., J. Newby, and K. Peng. 2012. Why one-shot information literacy sessions are not the future of instruction: A case for online credit courses. College & Research Libraries 73 (4):366–77. doi:10.5860/crl-271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montelongo, J. A., and N. Brar. 2008. Information literacy skills for education students: “One-shot” library sessions. Texas Library Journal 84 (3):96–101.
   Google Scholar
• Nierenberg, E., and Ø. G. Fjeldbu. 2015. How much do first-year undergraduate students in Norway know about information literacy? Journal of Information Literacy 9 (1):15–33. doi:10.11645/9.1.1983.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, H. A., and R. Schlegl. 2001. Standardization, objectivity, and user focus: A meta-analysis of subject access critiques. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 32 (2):61–80. doi:10.1300/J104v32n02_06.
   Google Scholar
• Rayini, J. 2017. Library and information services to the visually impaired persons. Library Philosophy & Practice 1510:1–13. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1510/
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, L., and G. Mattice. 2016. Early exposure to the scientific research process through collaboration with chemistry faculty and the science librarian. Science & Technology Libraries 35 (2):119–35. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2016.1162118.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. E. 2016. Accommodating faculty requests and staying true to your pedagogical ideals in the one-shot information literacy session. Communications in Information Literacy 10 (2):132–42. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spievak, E. R., and P. Hayes-Bohanan. 2013. Just enough of a good thing: Indications of long-term efficacy in one-shot library instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 39 (6):488–99. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stony Brook University. 2016. Undergraduate Bulletin: Women in science and engineering (WISE). Retrieved from http://sb.cc.stonybrook.edu/bulletin/2016/fall/policiesandregulations/special_academic_op/wise.php
   Google Scholar
• Talikka, M., H. Eskelinen, and H. Varri. 2014. Does IL education have an impact on undergraduate engineering students’ research skills? IATUL Annual Conference Proceedings 35:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Thill, M. C., J. W. Rosenzweig, and L. C. Wallis. 2016. The relationship between student demographics and student engagement with online library instruction modules. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice 11 (3):4–15. doi:10.18438/B8992D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K. W., and M. Pearce. 2014. Student engagement in one-shot library instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 40 (3–4):281–90. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, S. E., C. Rex, J. Markgraf, H. Kishel, E. Jennings, and K. Hinnant. 2013. Revising the “one-shot” through lesson study: Collaborating with writing faculty to rebuild a library instruction session. College & Research Libraries 74 (4):381–98. doi:10.5860/crl12-255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, R. 2012. Independent searching during one-shot information literacy instruction sessions: Is it an effective use of time? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 7 (4):52–67. doi:10.18438/B85323.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G., D. Chan, and S. Chu. 2006. Assessing the enduring impact of library instruction programs. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 (4):384–95. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar