Topic Development in the Freshman Engineering Paper: Finding a Focus

References

• Association of College and Research Libraries. 2016. Framework for information literacy for higher education. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. Accessed September 14, 2018. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin, N. J. 1980. Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science 5:133–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brostoff, A., and B. K. Beyer. 1980. An approach to integrating writing into a history course. Journal of Basic Writing 2 (4):36–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, C., B. Mandelblatt, and J. Stevenson. 2002. Visualizing a high recall search strategy output for undergraduates in an exploration stage of researching a term paper. Information Processing & Management 38 (1):37–54. doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(01)00029-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crismond, D. P., and R. S. Adams. 2012. The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education 101 (4):738–97. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dringenberg, E., and Ş. Purzer. 2018. Experiences of first‐year engineering students working on ill‐structured problems in teams. Journal of Engineering Education 107 (3):442–67. doi:10.1002/jee.20220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. A. 1997. Teaching positions: Difference, pedagogy, and the power of address. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fister, B. 1992. The research processes of undergraduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship 18 (3):163–69. doi:10.1007/s00897970136a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friese, S. 2012. Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and K. Krippendorff. 2007. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures 1 (1):77–89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664.
   Google Scholar
• Head, A. J., and M. B. Eisenberg. 2010. Truth be told: How college students evaluate and use information in the digital age. Seattle: The Information School, University of Washington. Accessed September 22, 2017. http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2010_Survey_FullReport1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IEE Technical Communication Staff. 2015. A study guide to IEE 1020 Technical Communication. Kalamazoo, MI: Stipes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. n.d. The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Accessed January 31, 2018. http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L., J. Penny, B. Gordon, S. R. Shumate, and S. P. Fisher. 2005. Resolving score differences in the rating of writing samples: Does discussion improve the accuracy of scores? Language Assessment Quarterly 2 (2):117–46. doi:10.1207/s15434311laq0202_2.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, L., C. Cole, and S. Carter. 1997. Connecting online search strategies and information needs: A user-centered, focus-labeling approach. RQ 36 (4):562–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, L., C. Cole, and S. Carter. 1999. The false focus in online searching: The particular case of undergraduates seeking information for course assignments in the humanities and social sciences. Reference & User Services Quarterly 38 (3):267–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B. 2011. Resolving discrepant ratings in writing assessments: The choice of resolution method and its application. English Teaching 66 (2):211–31. doi:10.15858/engtea.66.2.201106.211.
   Google Scholar
• Kracker, J., and P. Wang. 2002. Research anxiety and students’ perceptions of research: An experiment. Part II. Content analysis of their writings on two experiences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (4):295–307. doi:10.1002/asi.10041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U. 2014. Qualitative text analysis: Aguide to methods, practice & using software, ed. A. McWhertor. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. 1988a. Developing a model of the library search process: Cognitive and affective aspects. RQ 28 (2):232–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. 1988b. Perceptions of the information search process in libraries: A study of changes from high school through college. Information Processing and Management 24 (4):419–27. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(88)90045-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. 1989. The information search process of high-, middle-, and low-achieving high school seniors. School Library Media Quarterly 17 (4): 224–228.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. 1990. Validating a model of the search process: A comparison of academic, public and school library users. Library and Information Science Research 12 (1):5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. 1991. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42 (5):361–71. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<361::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-#.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. 2004. Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. 2nd ed. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., and F. Shrode. 2013. Undergraduates and topic selection: A librarian’s role. Journal of Library Innovation 4 (2):23–23.
   Google Scholar
• McMullin, S. E., and R. S. Taylor. 1984. Problem dimensions and information traits. The Information Society 3:91–111. doi:10.1080/01972243.1984.9959994.
   Google Scholar
• Moskal, B. M., and J. A. Leydens. 2000. Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. PARE: Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7 (10):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rinto, E., M. Bowles-Terry, and A. J. Santos. 2016. Assessing the scope and feasibility of first-year students’ research paper topics. College & Research Libraries 77 (6):749–64. doi:10.5860/crl.v77i6.16554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4 (2):155–69. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, N., and L. Saltz. 2004. The novice as expert: Writing the freshman year. College Composition and Communication 56 (1):124–49. doi:10.2307/4140684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1994. Grounded theory methodology. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 273–85. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. doi:10.1007/BF00988593.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, D. 1996. Information search process model: How freshmen begin research. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting., vol. 33, 95–99. Medford, N.J.: Information Today, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. S. 1969. Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries 29:178–94. doi:10.5860/crl_29_03_178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western Michigan University. 2018. Floyd hall and fast facts Western Michigan University. College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Accessed January 31, 2018. http://www.wmich.edu/engineer/about/floydhall.
   Google Scholar
• Western Michigan University - Institutional Research. 2018. WMU enrolled students by student level. Tableau Public. Accessed September 12, 2018. https://public.tableau.com/profile/wmuir#!/vizhome/WMUEnrolledStudents/byStudentLevel.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmire, E. 2003. Epistemological beliefs and the information-seeking behavior of undergraduates. Library & Information Science Research 25 (2):127–42. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00003-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. 1982. Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly 16 (2):195–209. doi:10.5054/tj.2010.215611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar