Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Citation Analysis of the Current Literature

References

• Aytac, S., and B. Slutsky. 2017. Authorship trends of research articles published in seven scientific, technical, engineering, and medical (STEM) library journals: Analysis of STEM library research from 2011–2015. Science & Technology Libraries 36 (2):114–34. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2017.1323070.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S. 2012. How much do core journals change over a decade? Library Resources & Technical Services 56 (2):80–93. doi:10.5860/lrts.56n2.80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. 2013. Practical applications of do-it-yourself citation analysis. The Serials Librarian 64 (1–4):285–98. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2013.760420.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, H. 2017. The status of women in STEM in higher education: A review of the literature 2007–2017. Science & Technology Libraries 36 (3):235–73. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2017.1371658.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., and D. Hans-Dieter. 2008. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal Of Documentation; Bradford 64 (1):45–80. doi:10.1108/00220410810844150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracke, M. S., J.-P. V. M. Hérubel, and S. M. Ward. 2010. Some thoughts on opportunities for collection development librarians. Collection Management 35 (3–4):255–59. doi:10.1080/01462679.2010.486993.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, S. C. 1934. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering 137:85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Brazzeal, B., and R. Fowler. 2005. Patterns of information use in graduate research in forestry. Science & Technology Libraries 26 (2):91–106. doi:10.1300/J122v26n02_05.
   Google Scholar
• Brush, D. A. 2015. Engineering master of science theses at Rowan University: A citation analysis of the first nine years. Science & Technology Libraries 34 (2):109–21. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2015.1031927.
   Google Scholar
• Choinski, E. M. 2007. Journal use in pharmacy. Science & Technology Libraries 27 (3):53–64. doi:10.1300/J122v27n03_04.
   Google Scholar
• Day, A., and J. Novak. 2019. The subject specialist is dead. Long live the subject specialist! Collection Management 1–14. doi:10.1080/01462679.2019.1573708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delwiche, F. A. 2018. Bibliometric analysis of scholarly publications on the Zika virus, 1952–2016. Science & Technology Libraries 37 (2):113–29. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2018.1431589.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, M. 2017. Seeing library data: A prototype data visualization application for librarians. Journal Of Web Librarianship 11 (1):69–78. doi:10.1080/19322909.2016.1239236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegaard, O., and J. A. Wallin. 2015. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics 105 (3):1809–31. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyereisen, P., and A. Spoiden. 2009. Can local citation analysis of master’s and doctoral theses help decision-making about the management of the collection of periodicals? A case study in psychology and education sciences. The Journal Of Academic Librarianship 35 (6):514–22. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2009.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, J. 2012. Literature use in engineering and computer science research: An analysis of works cited in dissertations and theses. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. http://www.istl.org/12-fall/refereed3.html.
   Google Scholar
• Frietsch, R., I. Haller, M. Funken-Vrohlings, and H. Grupp. 2009. Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing. Research Policy 38 (4):590–99. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 1972. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science 178 (4060):471–79. doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhard, K. H., J. D. Kushkowski, and C. Dobson. 1998. A method for building core journal lists in interdisciplinary subject areas. Journal Of Documentation 54 (4):477–88. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiasi, G., V. Larivière, and C. R. Sugimoto. 2015. On the compliance of women engineers with a gendered scientific system. Plos One 10 (12):e0145931. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M., and J. Zhao. 2017. Sustainability engineering collection assessment: A mixed-method analysis. Science & Technology Libraries 36 (2):153–69. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2017.1298493.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, K., and L. Doucette. 2012. A review of citation analysis methodologies for collection management. College & Research Libraries 73 (4):321–35. doi:10.5860/crl-254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., B. W. Ritchie, and P. Benckendorff. 2017. Bibliometric visualisation: An application in tourism crisis and disaster management research. Current Issues In Tourism 1–33. doi:10.1080/13683500.2017.1408574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczor, S. 2014. A citation analysis of doctoral dissertations in atmospheric science at the University at Albany. Science & Technology Libraries 33 (1):89–98. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2013.866067.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. 2015. Citation patterns of engineering, statistics, and computer science researchers: An internal and external citation analysis across multiple engineering subfields. College & Research Libraries 76 (7):859–82. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, K. C., and L. Gordon. 2014. Citation analysis as a tool for collection development and instruction. Collection Management 39 (4):275–96. doi:10.1080/01462679.2014.935904.
   Google Scholar
• Kuruppu, P., and D. Moore. 2008. Information use by PhD students in agriculture and biology: A dissertation citation analysis. Portal: Libraries And The Academy 8 (4):387–405. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., C. Ni, Y. Gingras, B. Cronin, and C. R. Sugimoto. 2013. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature News 504 (7479):211. doi:10.1038/504211a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. M., and K. M. Alpi. 2017. Bibliometric network analysis and visualization for serials librarians: An introduction to Sci2. Serials Review 43 (3–4):239–45. doi:10.1080/00987913.2017.1368057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, K. I., and V. Dressler. 2018. Using citation analysis to identify research fronts: A case study with the Internet of Things. Science & Technology Libraries 37 (2):171–86. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2017.1415183.
   Google Scholar
• Mering, M. 2017. Bibliometrics: Understanding author-, article- and journal-level metrics. Serials Review 43 (1):41–45. doi:10.1080/00987913.2017.1282288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohler, B. A. 2005. Citation analysis as an assessment tool. Science & Technology Libraries 25 (4):57–64. doi:10.1300/J122v25n04_05.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe-Gulick, A., L. Currie, and T. Weller. 2014. Local citation analysis of National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health Grant applications: Meeting the needs of researchers. The Serials Librarian 67 (4):399–414. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2014.983291.
   Google Scholar
• Morrisey, L. J. 2002. Bibliometric and bibliographic analysis in an era of electronic scholarly communication. Science & Technology Libraries 22 (3–4):149–60. doi:10.1300/J122v22n03_12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. A. 2013. Data visualization and rapid analytics: Applying tableau desktop to support library decision-making. Journal Of Web Librarianship 7 (4):465–76. doi:10.1080/19322909.2013.825148.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2017. STEM degrees. Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/indicator_reg.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Niu, X., B. M. Hemminger, C. Lown, S. Adams, C. Brown, A. Level, M. McLure, A. Powers, M. R. Tennant, and T. Cataldo. 2010. National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science And Technology 61 (5):869–90. doi:10.1002/asi.21217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, E. M. 2017. Academic librarians as STEM retention partners. Journal Of College Science Teaching 46 (5):6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, E. 2016. How to keep up with the scientific literature. Science | AAAS. https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/11/how-keep-scientific-literature.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, C., J. Stephens, R. Kimball, D. Ramirez, J. Thornton, and N. Burford. 2011. Revisiting an abandoned practice: The death and resurrection of collection development policies. Collection Management 36 (3):165–81. doi:10.1080/01462679.2011.580426.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, R. C., and R. Borchardt. 2015. Meaningful metrics: A 21st century librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, A division of the American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Wiles, L. M., and C. Marzabadi. 2018. What do chemists cite? A 5-Year analysis of references cited in American Chemical Society journal articles. Science & Technology Libraries 37 (3):246–73. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2018.1481488.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, A. S. 1965. Women in science: Why so few?: Social and psychological influences restrict women’s choice and pursuit of careers in science. Science 148 (3674):1196–202. doi:10.1126/science.148.3674.1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarseke, G. 2018. Under-Representation of women in science: From educational, feminist and scientific views. Naspa Journal About Women In Higher Education 11 (1):89–101. doi:10.1080/19407882.2017.1380049.
   Google Scholar
• Sinn, R. N. 2005. A local citation analysis of mathematical and statistical dissertations. Science & Technology Libraries 25 (4):25–37. doi:10.1300/J122v25n04_03.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. T. 2003. Assessing collection usefulness: An investigation of library ownership of the resources graduate students use. College And Research Libraries 64 (5):344–55. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/15615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, J., D. E. Hubbard, C. Pickett, and R. Kimball. 2013. Citation behavior of aerospace engineering faculty. The Journal Of Academic Librarianship 39 (6):451–57. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenopir, C., D. W. King, S. Edwards, and L. Wu. 2009a. Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings 61 (1):5–32. doi:10.1108/00012530910932267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenopir, C., D. W. King, J. Spencer, and L. Wu. 2009b. Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: What makes a difference? Library & Information Science Research 31 (3):139–48. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2009.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenopir, C., R. Mays, and L. Wu. 2011. Journal article growth and reading patterns. New Review Of Information Networking 16 (1):4–22. doi:10.1080/13614576.2011.566796.
   Google Scholar
• Vaaler, A. 2018. Sources of resources: A business school citation analysis study. Journal Of Business & Finance Librarianship 23 (2):1–13. doi:10.1080/08963568.2018.1510252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2014. Tidy data. Journal Of Statistical Software 59 (1):1–23. doi:10.18637/jss.v059.i10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, V., and C. L. Fletcher. 2006. Materials used by master’s students in engineering and implications for collection development: A citation analysis. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. http://www.istl.org/06-winter/refereed1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Y.-C., S.-H. Chang, and L.-C. Yu. 2016. An academic trend in STEM education from bibliometric and co-citation method. International Journal Of Information And Education Technology 6 (2):113–16. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.668.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. 2018. Analyzing citation and research collaboration characteristics of faculty in aerospace, civil and environmental, electrical and computer, and mechanical engineering. College And Research Libraries 79 (2):158–78. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar