Citation Analysis of Mathematics and Statistics Dissertations and Theses from the University at Albany

References

• Allen, E. S. 1929. Periodicals for mathematicians. Science 70 (1825):592–94. doi:10.1126/science.70.1825.592.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• arXiv.org. 2019a. About arXiv. Accessed November 11, 2019. https://arxiv.org/about.
   Google Scholar
• arXiv.org. 2019b. Arxiv monthly submission rates. Accessed November 11, 2019. https://arxiv.org/stats/monthly_submissions.
   Google Scholar
• arXiv.org. 2019c. Arxiv submission rate statistics. Accessed November 11, 2019. https://arxiv.org/help/stats/2018_by_area/index#math_yearly.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett-Ellis, P., and Y. Tang. 2016. User-Centered collection development: A citation analysis of graduate biology theses. Collection Management 41 (1):3–22. doi:10.1080/01462679.2016.1145088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, C., A. R. Davis, V. Eyer, and J. J. Meier. 2018. Google Scholar’s coverage of the engineering literature 10 years later. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44 (3):419–25. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson, D. S., and T. P. Franks. 2015. Winning the popularity contest: Researcher preference when selecting resources for civil engineering, computer science, mathematics and physics dissertations. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 81. doi:10.5062/F4N29TZK.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Sapena, A., R. Aleixandre-Benavent, F. Peset, and E. A. Sanchez-Perez. 2018. Citations to arXiv preprints by indexed journals and their impact on research evaluation. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice 6 (4):6–16. doi:10.1633/JISTAP.2018.6.4.1.
   Google Scholar
• Flaxbart, D. 2018. Analysis of citations to books in chemistry PhD dissertations in an era of transition. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 88. doi:10.5062/F4DV1H4T.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, T. P., and D. S. Dotson. 2017. Book publishers cited in science dissertations: Are commercial publishers worth the hype? Science & Technology Libraries 36 (1):63–76. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2016.1263172.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, P. L. K., and E. M. Gross. 1927. College libraries and chemical education. Science 66 (1713):385–89. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1651803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, B. 1996. Citation analysis of the Texas Tech University’s statistics faculty: A study applied to collection development at the university library. LIBRES: Library and Information Science Research 6 (3). https://www.libres-ejournal.info/992/.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. C. 2014. Dissertations and discussions: Engineering graduate student research resource use at New Mexico State University. Collection Building 33 (1):25–30. doi:10.1108/CB-09-2013-0037.
   Google Scholar
• Kayongo, J., and C. Helm. 2012. Relevance of library collections for graduate student research: A citation analysis study of doctoral dissertations at Notre Dame. College & Research Libraries 73 (1):47–67. doi:10.5860/crl-211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. 2015. Citation patterns of engineering, statistics, and computer science researchers: An internal and external citation analysis across multiple engineering subfields. College & Research Libraries 76 (7):859–82. doi:10.5860/crl.76.7.859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, M. J., G. Eichhorn, A. Accomazzi, C. Grant, M. Demleitner, E. Henneken, and S. S. Murray. 2005. The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing & Management 41 (6):1395–402. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., and C. R. Sugimoto. 2018. Do authors comply with mandates for open access? Nature 562 (7728):483–86. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., C. R. Sugimoto, B. Macaluso, S. Milojević, B. Cronin, and M. Thelwall. 2014. ArXiv e-prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (6):1157–69. doi:10.1002/asi.23044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisonger, T. E. 2008. The ‘80/20 Rule’ and core journals. The Serials Librarian 55 (1–2):62–84. doi:10.1080/03615260801970774.
   Google Scholar
• Noruzi, A. 2016. ArXiv popularity from a citation analysis point of view. Webology 13 (2):1–7. http://www.webology.org/2016/v13n2/editorial22.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. L. 2018. Book citations in PhD science dissertations: An examination of commercial book publishers’ influence. Library Trends 67 (2):286–302. doi:10.1353/lib.2018.0037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinn, R. N. 2005. A local citation analysis of mathematical and statistical dissertations. Science & Technology Libraries 25 (4):25–37. doi:10.1300/J122v25n04_03.
   Google Scholar