References
- Ashman, A. 2007. A citation analysis of three types of ichthyologic publications. Collection Management 31 (4):53–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v31n04_05.
- Barnett-Ellis, P., and Y. Tang. 2016. User-centered collection development: A citation analysis of graduate biology theses. Collection Management 41 (1):3–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2016.1145088.
- Brazzeal, B., and R. Fowler. 2005. Patterns of information use in graduate research in forestry: A citation analysis of master’s theses at Mississippi State University. Science & Technology Libraries 26 (2):91–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J122v26n02_05.
- Dotson, D., and T. Franks. 2015. Winning the popularity contest: Researcher preference when selecting resources for civil engineering, computer science, mathematics and physics dissertations. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 81 (summer).
- Eckel, E. 2009. The emerging engineering scholar: A citation analysis of theses and dissertations at Western Michigan University. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 56 (winter).
- Florida Gulf Coast University. n.d.a Fast facts. Accessed April 28, 2020. https://www.fgcu.edu/about/fastfacts
- Florida Gulf Coast University. n.d.b Environmental science MS. Accessed April 28, 2020. https://www.fgcu.edu/cas/departments/mes/enviroscims/
- Griffin, K. 2016. Citation analysis for core journals for educational leadership. Collection Building 35 (1):12–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/CB-07-2015-0014.
- Kaczor, S. 2014. A citation analysis of doctoral dissertations in atmospheric science at the University at Albany. Science & Technology Libraries 33 (1):89–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2013.866067.
- Massicotte, M., and K. Botter. 2017. Reference rot in the repository: A case study of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) in an academic library. Information Technology and Libraries 36 (1):11–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v36i1.9598.
- Miller, L. 2011. Local citation analysis of graduate biology theses: Collection development implications. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 64 (winter).
- Nisonger, T. 2008. The “80/20 rule” and core journals. The Serials Librarian 55 (1–2):62–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801970774.
- Smith, E. 2003. Assessing collection usefulness: An investigation of library ownership of the resources graduate students use. College and Research Libraries 64 (5):344–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.64.5.344.
- Walcott, R. 1992. Characteristics of citations in geoscience doctoral dissertations accepted at United States academic institutions 1981-1985. Science & Technology Libraries 12 (2):5–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J122v12n02_02.
- Wilson, G. Bradshaw Library. n.d. By the numbers. Accessed April 28, 2020. https://library.fgcu.edu/admin/quickstats.html
- Wirth, A., and M. Mellinger. 2011. Five years later: Predicting student use of journals in a new water resources graduate program. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 64 (winter).