1,275
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evaluative Frameworks and Scientific Knowledge for Undergraduate STEM Students: An Illustrative Case Study Perspective

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allard, S., K. J. Levine, and C. Tenopir. 2009. Design engineers and technical professionals at work: observing information usage in the workplace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(3):443–54. Hoboken: NJ. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/asi.21004.
  • Andrews, T., and R. Patil. 2007. “Information literacy for first-year students: an embedded curriculum approach.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (3): 253–59. doi:doi.10.1080/03043790701276205.
  • Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). 2015. Framework for information literacy for higher education. American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/framework1.pdf
  • Batchelor, O. 2017. Getting out the truth: The role of libraries in the fight against fake news. Reference Services Review 45 (2):143–48. doi:10.1108/RSR-03-2017-0006.
  • Bawden, D., C. Holtham, and N. Courtney. 1999. Perspectives on information overload. Aslib Proceedings 51(8):249–55. Association for Information Management (ASLIB). doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006984.
  • Blakeslee, S. 2004. The CRAAP test. LOEX Quarterly 31 (3). https://commons.emich.edu/loexquarterly/vol31/iss3/4.
  • Briggs, L. E., and J. M. Skidmore. 2008. Beyond the blended librarians: Creating full partnerships with faculty to embed information literacy in online learning systems. In Using technology to teach information literacy, ed., 87–109. T. P. Mackey, T. E. Jacobson, and N. Y. New York. Neal-Schuman.
  • Calkins, S., and M. R. Kelley. 2007. Evaluating Internet and scholarly sources across the disciplines: Two case studies. College Teaching 55 (4):151–56. doi:10.3200/CTCH.55.4.151-156.
  • Caruth, G. 2016. Today’s college students: Who are they and what do they require from a college education? International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 3 (1):34–46.
  • Clark, J., and J. Johnstone. 2018. Exploring the research mindset and information-seeking behaviors of undergraduate music students. College & Research Libraries 79 (4):499–516. doi:10.5860/crl.79.4.499.
  • Corry, M. D., T. W. Frick, and L. Hansen. 1997. User-centered design and usability testing of a web site: An illustrative case study. Educational Technology Research and Development 45 (4):65–76. doi:10.1007/BF02299683.
  • Critical Appraisal Checklists. (n.d.). BMJ best practice. Accessed June 16, 2020. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/ebm-toolbox/critical-appraisal-checklists/
  • Critical Appraisal Tools. (n.d.). Centre for evidence-based medicine. Accessed June 16, 2020 https://www.cebm.net/2014/06/critical-appraisal/
  • Denick, D., J. Bhatt, and B. Layton 2010. Citation analysis of engineering design reports for information literacy assessment. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Louisville, Conference Proceedings.
  • Derksen, L., C. M. Leclerc, and P. C. L. Souza. 2019. Searching for answers: The impact of student access to wikipedia. The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1236. University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  • Dervin, B. 1998. Sense‐making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management 2 (2):36–46. doi:10.1108/13673279810249369.
  • Editors. 2020. Expression of concern: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: A multinational registry analysis. Lancet 395:10240: E102. JUNE 13.
  • Edmunds, A., and A. Morris. 2000. The problem of information overload in business organisations: A review of the literature. International Journal of Information Management 20 (1):17–28. doi:10.1016/S0268-4012(99)00051-1.
  • Elmwood, V. 2018. What the CRAAP?: Comparing approaches to teaching web evaluation in FYE programs. Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy 65. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gaintlit/2018/2018/65.
  • Feldman-Maggor, Y., A. Rom, and I. Tuvi-Arad. 2016. Integration of open educational resources in undergraduate chemistry teaching–a mapping tool and lecturers’ considerations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 17 (2):283–95. doi:10.1039/C5RP00184F.
  • Flanigan, A. E., and W. A. Babchuk. 2015. Social media as academic quicksand: A phenomenological study of student experiences in and out of the classroom. Learning and Individual Differences 44:40–45. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.003.
  • Franklin, A. 2005. No easy answers: Science and the pursuit of knowledge. Pittsburgh:PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Goette, L., H. J. Han, and B. T. K. Leung 2020. Information overload and confirmation bias. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics. doi:10.17863/CAM.52487
  • Greyson, D. 2018. Information triangulation: A complex and agentic everyday information practice. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69 (7):869–78. doi:10.1002/asi.24012.
  • Head, A. J., and M. B. Eisenberg 2009. Finding context: What today’s college students say about conducting research in the digital age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report. University of Washington Information School.
  • Healthline. Studies on hydroxychloroquine retracted, early evidence lacking. Accessed June 15, 2020. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/too-early-to-know-if-hydroxychloroquine-will-work
  • Hofer, A. R., L. Townsend, and K. Brunetti. 2012. Troublesome concepts and information literacy: Investigating threshold concepts for IL instruction. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 12 (4):387–405. doi:10.1353/pla.2012.0039.
  • Huang, M. H., and Y. W. Chang. 2008. Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (11):1819–28. doi:10.1002/asi.20885.
  • Jackson, T. W., and P. Farzaneh. 2012. Theory-based model of factors affecting information overload. International Journal of Information Management 32 (6):523–32. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.04.006.
  • Judd, T., and G. Kennedy. 2011. Expediency-based practice? Medical students’ reliance on Google and Wikipedia for biomedical inquiries. British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (2):351–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01019.x.
  • Julien, H., M. Gross, and D. Latham. 2018. A survey of information literacy instructional practices in U.S. academic libraries. College & Research Libraries 79 (2):179–99. doi:10.5860/crl.79.2.179.
  • Kabat, G. C. 2017. Taking distrust of science seriously: To overcome public distrust in science, scientists need to stop pretending that there is a scientific consensus on controversial issues when there is not. EMBO Reports 18 (7):1052–55. doi:10.15252/embr.201744294.
  • Kari, J., and R. Savolainen. 2007. Relationships between information seeking and context: A qualitative study of Internet searching and the goals of personal development. Library and Information Science Research 29 (1):47–69. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2006.08.011.
  • Karn-Carmichael, K., and K. D. Weaver. 2016. Giving government information the green light: Creating and using the stoplight evaluation guide in the information literacy classroom. DttP 44:14–18. doi:10.5860/dttp.v44i1.6060.
  • Katopol, P. 2010. Cognitive work analysis: a framework for research in collaborative information seeking. A paper presented at the first workshop in collaborative information seeking [Collaborative information seeking: towards new theories and applications], vol. 7.
  • Kennedy, L., C. Cole, and S. Carter. 1999. The false focus in online searching: The particular case of undergraduates seeking information for course assignments in the humanities and social sciences. Reference and User Services Quarterly 38:3.
  • Klompas, M., C. A. Morris, J. Sinclair, M. Pearson, and E. S. Shenoy. 2020a. Correspondence - universal masking in the COVID-19 era. New England Journal of Medicine Accessed June 3 Massachussetts Medical Society. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2020836.
  • Klompas, M., C. A. Morris, J. Sinclair, M. Pearson, and E. S. Shenoy. 2020b. Universal masking in hospitals in the COVID-19 era. New England Journal of Medicine Massachussetts Medical Society. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2006372.
  • Knight, S., and N. Mercer. 2017. Collaborative epistemic discourse in classroom information-seeking tasks. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education 26 (1):33–50. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2016.1159978.
  • Kupferschmidt, K. 2020. Three big studies dim hopes that hydroxychloroquine can treat or prevent COVID-19. Science. Accessed June 15, 2020. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/three-big-studies-dim-hopes-hydroxychloroquine-can-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
  • Lamont, G., et al. 2020. Information-seeking behavior among first-year engineering students and the impacts of pedagogical intervention. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Online, Conference Proceedings.
  • Landhuis, E. 2016. Scientific literature: Information overload. Nature 535 (7612):457–58. doi:10.1038/nj7612-457a.
  • Lewis, AB. 2018. What does bad information look like? Using the CRAAP test for evaluating substandard resources. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship (88). doi:10.5062/F41N7ZC4.
  • Lumsden, C. J., M. S. N. Kumar, J. S. Mooney, J. Hart, F. MacNicoll, and L. M. Byrne-Davis. 2015. Do medical students assess the credibility of online or downloadable medical reference resources? International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence 6 (1):18–32. doi:10.4018/IJDLDC.2015010102.
  • Mandalios, J. 2013. RADAR: An approach for helping students evaluate Internet sources. Journal of Information Science 39 (4):470–78. doi:10.1177/0165551513478889.
  • Mehra, M. R., S. S. Desai, F. Ruschitzka, and A. N. Patel. 2020. Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: A multinational registry analysis. The Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6.
  • Meola M. (2004). Chucking the Checklist: A Contextual Approach to Teaching Undergraduates Web-Site Evaluation portal: Libraries and the Academy 4 (3): 331–344.
  • Mercer, K., K. D. Weaver, and J. A. Stables-Kennedy 2019. Understanding undergraduate engineering student information access and needs: Results from a scoping review. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Conference Proceedings.
  • Mercer, K., K. D. Weaver, R. Figueiredo, and C. Carter. 2020. Critical appraisal: The key to unlocking information literacy in the STEM disciplines. C&RL News 81 (No):3. doi:10.5860/crln.81.3.145.
  • Meyer, J., and R. Land 2003. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. ETL Project Occasional Report 4. University of Edinburgh.
  • Mooney, C. 2011. The science of why we don’t believe science. Mother Jones. Accessed June 15, 2020. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/04/denial-science-chris-mooney/Date.
  • Murayama, K., A. B. Blake, T. Kerr, and A. D. Castel. 2016. When enough is not enough: Information overload and metacognitive decisions to stop studying information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42 (6):914–24. doi:10.1037/xlm0000213.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Policy and Global Affairs, & Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable. 2017. Examining the mistrust of science: Proceedings of a workshop—in brief. National Academies Press (US).
  • Olsen, M. W., and A. R. Diekema. 2012. “I just Wikipedia it”: Information behavior of first-year writing students. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49 (1):1–11. doi:10.1002/meet.14504901176.
  • Perry, H. B. 2017. Information literacy in the sciences: Faculty perception of undergraduate student skill. College & Research Libraries 78(7):964–77. Accessed December 16, 2019. doi:10.5860/crl.78.7.964.
  • Phelps, S., L. Hyde, and J. P. Wolf. 2018. The intersection: Where evidence based nursing and information literacy meet. Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier.
  • Phillips, M., A. Van Epps, N. Johnson, and D. Zwicky. 2018. Effective engineering information literacy instruction: A systematic literature review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 44 (6):705–11. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2018.10.006.
  • Taraban, R. 2006. The growth of text literacy in engineering undergraduate. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, Conference Proceedings.
  • Tsipursky, G. 2018. (Dis)trust in science can we cure the scourge of misinformation? Scientific American. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/dis-trust-in-science/
  • Wakefield, A. J., S. H. Murch, A. Anthony, J. Linnell, D. M. Casson, M. Malik, A. Valentine, A. P. Dhillon, M. A. Thomson, and P. Harvey. 1998. RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 351 (9103):637–41. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11096-0.
  • Wellings, S., and B. Casselden. 2019. An exploration into the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51 (3):789–800. doi:10.1177/0961000617742466.
  • Wichowski, D. E., and L. E. Kohl. 2013. Establishing credibility in the information jungle: Blogs, microblogs, and the CRAAP test. In Online credibility and digital ethos: Evaluating computer-mediated communication, 229–51. Hershey PA: IGI Global.
  • Wikipedia:Wikipediais not a reliable source - Wikipedia. (n.d.). Accessed June 15, 2020
  • Young, J. M., and M. J. Solomon. 2009. How to critically appraise an article. Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology and Hepatology 6:82–91. doi:10.1038/ncpgasthep1331.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.