A Scientometric Review of Global Altmetrics Research

References

• Antony, J., and R. Selvaraju. 2020. Growth, indexing and authorship pattern of poultry industry research publications. Journal of Scientometric Research 8 (3):150–55. doi:10.5530/jscires.8.3.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aria, M., and C. Cuccurullo. 2017. Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 11 (4):959–75. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banshal, S. K., V. K. Singh, P. K. Muhuri, and P. Mayr. 2019a. Disciplinary variations in altmetric coverage of scholarly articles. In International Conference Scientometrics Informetrics, ISSI - Proceedings, ed. G. Catalano, C. Daraio, M. Gregori, H. F. Moed, and G. Ruocco, vol. 2, 1870–81. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, September 2-5, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Banshal, S. K., V. K. Singh, G. Kaderye, P. K. Muhuri, and B. P. Sánchez. 2018. An altmetric analysis of scholarly articles from India. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 34 (5):3111–18. doi:10.3233/JIFS-169495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banshal, S. K., V. K. Singh, P. K. Muhuri, and P. Mayr. 2019b. How much research output from India gets social media attention? Current Science 117 (5):753–60. doi:10.18520/cs/v117/i5/753-760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barakat, A. F., N. Nimri, M. Shokr, D. Mahtta, H. Mansoor, M. K. Mojadidi, A. N. Mahmoud, M. Senussi, A. Masri, and I. Y. Elgendy. 2018. Correlation of altmetric attention score with article citations in cardiovascular research. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 72 (8):952–53. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran, C. 2020. Altmetrics research on the global output: A scientometric analysis. In Baskaran, C (Eds.), Measuring and implementing altmetrics in library and information science research: Advances in library and information science, 62–73. USA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., and W. Marx. 2018. Critical rationalism and the search for standard (Field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics. Journal of Informetrics 12 (3):598–604. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-H., M.-C. Tang, C.-M. Wang, and J. Hsiang. 2015. Exploring alternative metrics of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan. Scientometrics 102 (1):97–112. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1420-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A. K., and S. Mishra. 2014. Genesis of altmetrics or article-level metrics for measuring efficacy of scholarly communications: Current perspectives. ArXiv:1408.0090 [Cs].
   Google Scholar
• Derviş, H. 2020. Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package. Journal of Scientometric Research 8 (3):156–60. doi:10.5530/jscires.8.3.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekundayo, T. C., and A. I. Okoh. 2018. “A global bibliometric analysis of plesiomonas-related research (1990–2017)” edited by A. M. Sibai. PLOS ONE 13 (11):e0207655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firdaus, A., M. F. Ab Razak, A. Feizollah, I. A. T. Hashem, M. Hazim, and N. B. Anuar. 2019. The rise of ‘blockchain’: Bibliometric analysis of blockchain study. Scientometrics 120 (3):1289–331. doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03170-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosso Wamba, S. 2020. Humanitarian supply chain: A bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Annals of Operations Research. doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03594-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W., and J. Gorraiz. 2015. Usage metrics versus altmetrics: Confusing terminology? Scientometrics 102 (3):2161–64. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1472-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Valiente, C. L., J. Pacheco-Mendoza, and R. Arencibia-Jorge. 2016. A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation. Learned Publishing 29 (4):229–38. doi:10.1002/leap.1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, J. 2012. Scholars seek better ways to track impact online. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrived from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ984789.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., P. Wang, and Q. Wu. 2018. A correlation comparison between altmetric attention scores and citations for six PLOS journals. PLoS ONE 13:4. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jana, S., A. Gupta, and A. Nath. 2020. Assessment of global performance on COVID-19 research during 1990–2019: An exploratory scientometric analysis. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (Special Issue on Covid19)9:21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeon, P., and A. Paul-Hus. 2016. The journal coverage of web of science and scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106 (1):213–28. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piwowar, H. 2013. Value all research products. Nature 493 (7431):159–159. doi:10.1038/493159a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priem, J. 2010. (20) Jason Priem on Twitter: ‘I like the term #articlelevelmetrics, but it fails to imply *diversity* of measures. Lately, I’m liking #altmetrics.’/Twitter. Twitter. Accessed December 12, 2019. https://twitter.com/jasonpriem/status/25844968813.
   Google Scholar
• Priem, J., D. Taraborelli, P. Groth, and C. Neylon. 2010. Altmetrics: A manifesto – Altmetrics.Org. Accessed December 30, 2019. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, S., K. Singh, and A. K. Varma. 2020. A bibliometric analysis of deep web research during 1997 to 2019. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 40 (2):104–12. doi:10.14429/djlit.40.02.15461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repiso, R., A. Castillo-Esparcia, and D. Torres-Salinas. 2019. Altmetrics, alternative indicators for web of science communication studies journals. Scientometrics 119 (2):941–58. doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03070-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Soler, R., J. Uribe-Toril, and J. De Pablo Valenciano. 2020. Worldwide trends in the scientific production on rural depopulation, a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-Tool. Land Use Policy 97:104787. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, R., and Ye, Y. Fred. 2013. A multi-metric approach for research evaluation. Chinese Science Bulletin 58 (26):3288–90. doi:10.1007/s11434-013-5939-3.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, H., Y. Zhang, W. Zhilong, and L. Tiangui. 2020b. A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land 9 (1):28. doi:10.3390/land9010028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H., Y. Zhang, Y. Choi, and L. Fengqin. 2020a. A scientometrics review on land ecosystem service research. Sustainability 12 (7):2959. doi:10.3390/su12072959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar