Cluster Analysis and Network Visualization of Global Research on Digital Libraries during 2016–2020: A Bibliometric Mapping

References

• Ahmad, K., Z. J. Ming, and M. Rafi. 2018. Assessing the digital library research output: Bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2016. The Electronic Library 36:696–704. doi:10.1108/EL-02-2017-0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, J., S. Raju, and A. Alagu. 2019. A Scientometric assessment of digital library publication output from 2009-2018. In Proceedings of the paper presented at International Conference on Reshaping Librarianship: Innovations and Trasformations (ICRLIT-2019), 23–29. Coimbatore, India: Arinagar Anna Central Library.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, A. 1976. The bibliometric distributions. Library Quarterly 46:416–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgohain, D. J. 2020. Digital library development and digital library initiatives in India. In Public library and digital divide: Opportunities and challenges, ed. A. K. Padhi, 134–42. Sambalpur: Odisha State Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Borgohain, D. J., N. M. Ahmad, and M. K. Verma. 2021. Nanotechnology Research in SAARC nations during 1996 to 2020: A scientometric assessment based on Scopus database. Library Philosophy and Practice 4941.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, G. G., and S. Chowdhury. 1999. Progress in Documentation, digital library research: Major issues and trends. Journal of Documentation 55:409–48. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., and M. K. Verma. 2021. Digital library research in BRICS countries during 2000-2019: A scientometric analysis. Annals of Library and Information Studies 68:127–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doleck, T., and S. Lajoie. 2018. Social networking and academic performance: A review. Education and Information Technologies 23:435–65. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9612-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. A. F. 2018. Mapping the field of arts based management: Bibliographic coupling and cocitation analyses. Journal of Business Research 85:348–57. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M. J., and A. Booth. 2009. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal 26:91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, D., T. Wang, X. Wang, X. Yang, and Z. Yu. 2019. Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of electronic health and telemedicine research. International Journal of Medical Informatics 130:103947. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, B. M., S. M. Dhawan, R. Gupta, and F. Nisha. 2017. Digital Libraries: A scientometric assessment of global publication output during 2007-16. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology 7:247–52. doi:10.5958/2249-5576.2017.00033.4.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, W. W., and C. S. Wilson. 2001. The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics. Scientometrics 52:291–314. doi:10.1023/A:1017919924342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabeen, M., M. Imran, K. Badar, M. Rafiq, M. Jabeen, and L. Yun. 2017. Scientific collaboration of library and information science research in India (2012-2013). Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 22:67–83. doi:10.22452/mjlis.vol22no2.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotka, A. J. 1926. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16:317–25.
   Google Scholar
• Moller, A. M., and P. S. Myles. 2016. What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis? British Journal of Anaesthesia 117:428–30. doi:10.1093/bja/aew264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pao, M. L. 1986. An emperical examination of Lotka’s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37:26–33. doi:10.1002/asi.4630370105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, J. G., W. Miao, and Y. Si Hongyun. 2019. Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of urban vitality research. Sustainability 11:988. doi:10.3390/su11040988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla, R., and M. K. Verma. 2019. Digital library research in India during 1989-2018: A scientometric analysis using Scopus database. Journal of Information and Systems Management 9:62–73. doi:10.6025/jism/2019/9/2/62-73.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, G., R. Mittal, and M. Ahmad. 2007. A bibliometric study of literature on digital libraries. The Electronic Library 25:342–48. doi:10.1108/02640470710754841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood, S., D. Tiwari, and S. Khanna. 2018. Research in digital library field: A scientometric assessment of publications output during 2006-15. International Journal of Library Information Network and Knowledge 3:76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Sudhier, K. G. P. 2013. Lotka’s law and pattern of author productivity in the area of physics research. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology 33:457–64. doi:10.14429/djlit.33.5477.
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84:523–38. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar