References
- Aghion, P., C. Harris, P. Howitt, and J. Vickers. 2001. Competition, imitation, and growth with step-by-step innovation. Review of Economic Studies 68 (3):467–92. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00177.
- Anna, N. E. V., N. D. Anawati, and N. A. N. Azizi. 2021. Analysis of bibliometrics research in library philosophy and practice from 1998–2021. Library Philosophy and Practice 2021:1–17. May.
- Ashai, M., R. G. Mukherjee, S. P. Mundharikar, V. D. Kuanr, S. A. Wagle, and R. Harikrishnan. 2021. A bibliometric perspective survey of astronomical object tracking system. Library Philosophy and Practice 2021:1–22.
- Aulianto, D. R., C. N. Annisa, and M. A. Taufiqi. 2021. Bibliometric analysis of “Jurnal Lingkungan Dan Bencana Geologi” 2016–2020 period. Library Philosophy and Practice 2021:1–14.
- Basit, S. A. 2021. Bibliometric analysis of digital divide using web of science bibliometric analysis of digital divide using web of science. Library Philosophy and Practice 2021 1–22.
- Chu, A. C., G. Cozzi, and S. Galli. 2012. Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation? European Economic Review 56 (4):727–46. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.01.007.
- Chu, A. 2010. Effects of patent policy on income and consumption inequality in a R&D growth model. Southern Economic Journal 77 (2):336–50. doi:10.4284/sej.2010.77.2.336.
- Cohen, W. M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. R. Nelson, and J. R. Walsh. 2002. R&D spillovers, patents, and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy 31:1349–67. ( Conference of the Danish-Research-Unit-for-Industrial-Dynamics). doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9.
- Encaoua, D., D. Guellec, and C. Martínez. 2006. Patent systems for encouraging innovation: Lessons from economic analysis. Research Policy 35 (9):1423–40. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.07.004.
- Futagami, K., and T. Iwaisako. 2007. Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory 132 (1):306–34. doi:10.1016/j.jet.2005.07.009.
- Gong, H., and S. Peng. 2018. Effects of patent policy on innovation outputs and commercialization: Evidence from Universities in China. Scientometrics 117 (2):687–703. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2893-5.
- Gupta, V. K. 2004. Inventors’ productivity in a publicly funded R&D agency - The case of CSIR in India. World Patent Information 26 (3):235–38. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2004.02.001.
- Hall, B. H. 2007. Patents and patent policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23 (4):568–87. doi:10.1093/icb/grm037.
- Hu, W., T. Yoshioka-Kobayashi, and T. Watanabe. 2020. Determinants of patent infringement awards in the US, Japan, and China: A comparative analysis. World Patent Information. 60. March. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2019.101947.
- Iwaisako, T., and K. Futagami. 2003. Patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economics 78 (3):239–58. doi:10.1007/s00712-002-0541-1.
- Iwaisako, T., and K. Futagami. 2013. Patent protection, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Economic Theory 52 (2):631–68. doi:10.1007/s00199-011-0658-y.
- Jaffe, A. B. 2000. The US patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process. Research Policy 29 (4–5):531–57. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00088-8.
- Jeon, H., and M. Nishihara. 2018. Optimal patent policy in the presence of vertical separation. European Journal of Operational Research 270 (2):682–97. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.03.027.
- O’Donoghue, T., S. Scotchmer, and J. F. Thisse. 1998. Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 7 (1):1–32. doi:10.1111/j.1430-9134.1998.00001.x.
- Ouellette, L. L., and A. Tutt. 2020. How do patent incentives affect university researchers? International Review of Law and Economics 61 (March):105883. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2019.105883.
- Panda, S., and R. Sharma. 2021. Do changes in patent policy influence firms’ technology strategy? Evidence from manufacturing in India. Journal of Policy Modeling 43 (2):362–75. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.09.002.
- Patyal, V., D. Jaspal, and K. Khare. 2020. Wastewater treatment technologies: A bibliometric analysis. Science and Technology Libraries 39 (4):383–94. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2020.1775164.
- Sharma, R., and S. K. Ambrammal. 2015. International technology transfer and domestic patent policy: An empirical analysis of Indian industry. The Journal of Developing Areas 49 (3):165–81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24737314.
- Tong, T. W., K. Zhang, Z.-L. He, and Y. Zhang. 2018. What determines the duration of patent examination in China? An outcome-specific duration analysis of invention patent applications at SIPO. Research Policy 47 (3):583–91. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.002.
- van Nunen, K., J. Li, G. Reniers, and K. Ponnet. 2018. Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety Science 108 (August):248–58. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011.
- Vellaichamy, A. 2021. A bibliometric analysis of journal of advances in library and information science (JALIS) from 2016–2020: An international online journal. Library Philosophy and Practice 2021:1–14.
- Wu, X. B. 2012. The evolution of innovation policy in China: A brief introduction. Australian Economic Review 45 (4):463–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8462.2012.00706.x.
- Ye, P. H., Y. A. Li, H. R. Zhang, and H. B. Shen. 2020. Bibliometric analysis on the research of offshore wind power based on web of science. Economic Research-Ekonomska IstraZivanja 33 (1):887–903. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2020.1734853.