Toxicological Information Literacy Protects Human Health

References

• ALA ACRL. 2000. Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Accessed May 26, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11213/7668.
   Google Scholar
• Azam Ali, P., and R. Watson. 2016. Peer review and the publication process. Nursing Open 3 (4):193–202. doi:10.1002/nop2.51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benigeri, M., and P. Pluye. 2003. Shortcomings of health information on the internet. Health Promotion International 18 (4):381–86. doi:10.1093/heapro/dag409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk, B.-C. 2017. Open access to scientific articles: A review of benefits and challenges. Internal and Emergency Medicine 12 (2):247–53. doi:10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassileth, B. R., and I. R. Yarett. 2012. Cancer quackery: The persistent popularity of useless, irrational ‘alternative’ treatments. Oncology (Williston Park) 26 (8):754–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl, S. R. 2001. Subramanyam revisited: Creating a new model for information literacy instruction. College and Research Libraries 62 (5):455–64. doi:10.5860/crl.62.5.455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOAJ. 2021. DOAJ : The directory of open access journals. Accessed June 1, 2021. https://doaj.org/.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA. 2021a. Chemicals in our life. Accessed May 26, 2021. https://chemicalsinourlife.echa.europa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA. 2021b. Understanding CLP. Accessed May 26, 2021. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/clp/understanding-clp.
   Google Scholar
• Elsabry, E. 2017. Claims about benefits of open access to society (beyond academia). In Expanding Perspectives on Open Science: Communities, Cultures and Diversity in Concepts and Practices - Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Electronic Publishing, 34–43. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-34.
   Google Scholar
• EMA. 2021. Good manufacturing practice. Accessed May 26, 2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/compliance/good-manufacturing-practice.
   Google Scholar
• Fernanda, M. 2020. Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact. Scientometrics 125 (1):689–716. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03652-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health On the Net. 2020. HONcode certification. Accessed August 10, 2021. https://www.hon.ch/en/certification.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jadad, A. R., and A. Gagliardi. 1998. Rating health information on the internet: Navigating to knowledge or to babel? JAMA?: The Journal of the American Medical Association 279 (8):611–14. doi:10.1001/jama.279.8.611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keselman, A., C. Arnott Smith, A. C. Murcko, and D. R. Kaufman. 2019. Evaluating the quality of health information in a changing digital ecosystem. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21 (2):e11129. doi:10.2196/11129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leino, V., R. Airaksinen, M. Viluksela, and K. Vähäkangas. 2021. Toxicity of colloidal silver products and their marketing claims in Finland. Toxicology Reports 8:106–13. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.12.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loan, F. A., and S. Sheikh. 2016. Analytical study of open access health and medical repositories. The Electronic Library 34 (3):419–34. doi:10.1108/EL-01-2015-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, D. 2008. Doubt is their product : How industry’s assault on science threatens your health. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021a. OECD test guidelines for chemicals. Accessed May 7, 2021. https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/oecdguidelinesforthetestingofchemicals.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021b. Good laboratory practice (GLP). Accessed May 7, 2021. https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/good-laboratory-practiceglp.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., and D. G. Rand. 2021. The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25 (5):388–402. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeser, D. 2013. Natural versus synthetic chemicals is a gray matter. Accessed May 26, 2021. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/natural-vs-synthetic-chemicals-is-a-gray-matter/.
   Google Scholar
• Shanbhag, S. 2006. Alternative models of knowledge production: A step forward in information literacy as a liberal art. Library Philosophy and Practice, no. 2, University of Idaho Library. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/71/.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanyam, K. 1981. Scientific and technical information resources. Books in library and information science . Vol. 33. New York, NY: Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomisto, J. 2006. Word to Eurotox (43th congress of the European societies of toxicology, Dubrovnik, September 20. Accessed May 26, 2021. https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/tammisol/Eurotox06.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UC Berkeley Library. 2021. Evaluating resources. Accessed August 5, 2021. https://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/evaluating-resources.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE. 2021. About the GHS. Accessed May 26, 2021. https://unece.org/about-ghs.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. Z., A. Pourang, and B. Burrall. 2019. Open access medical journals: Benefits and challenges. Clinics in Dermatology 37 (1):52–55. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2018.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, P., and A. N. Hayes. 2019. The evolving journey of toxicology : A historical glimpse. In Casarett and Doull’s toxicology : The basic science of poisons, ed. C. D. Klaassen, 3–23. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, P., S. Gilbert, A. Mohapatra, S. Bobst, A. Hayes, and S. Humes. 2020a. Information resources in toxicology : Volume 1: Background, resources, and tools. 5th ed. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, P., S. Gilbert, A. Mohapatra, S. Bobst, A. Hayes, and S. T. Humes. 2020b. Information resources in toxicology : Volume 2: The global Arena. 5th ed. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe, T. J. 2015. The information literacy imperative in higher education. Liberal Education 102 (1):52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J. T., and J. B. McCormick. 2018. Why health professionals should speak out against false beliefs on the internet. AMA Journal of Ethics 20 (11):1052–58. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2018.1052.
   Google Scholar