Discovering Open Access Trends in Engineering: A Bibliometric Analysis of Open Access Publications at a Large Research University

References

• Antelman, K. 2017. Leveraging the growth of open access in library collection decision making. ACRL 2017 Proceedings: At the Helm, Leading the Transformation, March 22–25,Baltimore, Maryland, ed. D. M. Mueller, 411–22, Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Atchison, A., and J. Bull. 2015. Will open access get me cited? An analysis of the efficacy of open access publishing in political science. PS: Political Science and Politics 48 (1):129–37. doi:10.1017/S1049096514001668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, C. W. 2007. Open access and libraries. Collection Management 32 (3–4):351–83. doi:10.1300/J105v32n03_07.
   Google Scholar
• Barbaro, A., M. Zedda, D. Gentili, and R. L. Greenblatt. 2015. The presence of high-impact factor open access journals in science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM) disciplines. Italian Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science 6 (3):57–76. doi:10.4403/jlis.it-11257.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, B. C. 2017. Gold, green, and black open access. Learned publishing 30(2):173–175. doi:10.1002/leap.1096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, G. R. 2015. Cost impact in managing the transition to open access model. The 34th Annual Charleston Conference, Charleston SC, November 5–8, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10722/218000.
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate. 2021. Web of Science journal evaluation process and selection criteria. Accessed September 7, 2021. https://clarivate-com.proxy.libraries.rutgers.edu/webofsciencegroup/journal-evaluation-process-and-selection-criteria/.
   Google Scholar
• Corrall, S., M. A. Kennan, and W. Afzal. 2013. Bibliometrics and research data management services: Emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends 61 (3):636–74. doi:10.1353/lib.2013.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlin, D. M., and B. J. Jansen. 2016. Modeling journal bibliometrics to predict downloads and inform purchase decisions at university research libraries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (9):2263–73. doi:10.1002/asi.23549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, M. A., and D. Solomon. 2017. Leveraging librarian liaison expertise in a new consultancy role. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 43 (2):121–27. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2017.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsevier. 2021. Ei Compendex content policy and selection. Accessed September 7, 2021. http://www.elsevier.com/solutions/engineering-village/content/selection-criteria.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, H. 2021. Analysis of the new scopus CiteScore. Scientometrics 126 (6):5321–31. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03964-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, J., and C. Wolff-Eisenberg. 2020. Academic library strategy and budgeting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ithaka S+R. doi: 10.18665/sr.314507.
   Google Scholar
• Haddow, G., and J. Mamtora. 2017. Research support in Australian academic libraries: Services, resources, and relationships. New Review of Academic Librarianship 23 (2–3):89–109. doi:10.1080/13614533.2017.1318765.
   Google Scholar
• Harnad, S., T. Brody, F. Vallières, L. Carr, S. Hitchcock, Y. Gingras, C. Oppenheim, C. Hajjem, and E. R. Hilf. 2004. The access impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review 34 (4):310–14. doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2007.12.005.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppenfeld, J., and M. M. Smith. 2014. Information-seeking behaviors of business faculty. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 19 (1):1–14. doi:10.1080/08963568.2014.852906.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, D. E. 2015. A local and multi-institutional study of open access engineering publishing. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA. https://peer.asee.org/23403 Accessed 6 May 2021
   Google Scholar
• LaBonte, K. B. Citation analysis: A method for collection development for a rapidly developing field. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship No. 45 (Summer 2005). December 15.
   Google Scholar
• LaBonte, K. B. 2005. Citation Analysis: A Method for Collection Development for a Rapidly Developing Field. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (43 https://doi.org/10.5062/F4TX3CB1).
   Google Scholar
• Mischo, W. H., and M. C. Schlembach. 2011. Open access issues and engineering faculty attitudes and practices. Journal of Library Administration 51 (5–6):432–54. doi:10.1080/01930826.2011.589349.
   Google Scholar
• Piwowar, H., J. Priem, V. Larivière, J. P. Alperin, L. Matthias, B. Norlander, A. Farley, J. West, and S. Haustein. 2018. The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ 6:e4375. doi:10.7717/peerj.4375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, D., and A. Michael. 2020. News & views: Open access market sizing update 2020. Delta Think. Accessed January 4, 2022. https://deltathink.com/news-views-open-access-market-sizing-update-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, K. R., and J. J. Elder. 2019. A bibliometric services workshop for subject librarians. Library Management 40 (5):305–12. doi:10.1108/LM-03-2018-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, F. T. 2020. A report on preparing the Council on East Asian Libraries’s (CEAL) statement on collection development and acquisition amid the COVID-19 pandemic: In collaboration with the North American Coordinating Council on Japanese Library Resources (NCC) and the Society of Chinese Studies Librarians (SCSL). Journal of East Asian Libraries 2020 (171):5. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jeal/vol2020/iss171/5/ Accessed 23 March 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, R. C., and R. Borchardt. 2014. Keeping up with … altmetrics. Accessed September 7, 2021. https://ala.org/acrl/publications/keeping_up_with/altmetrics.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, L., A. R. Chowdhury, and J. J. Smith. 2017. Faculty publications from a research university: The scholarly impact of open access versus non-open access. Science & Technology Libraries 36 (2):187–99. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2016.1273815.
   Google Scholar
• Severin, A., M. Egger, M. P. Eve, and D. Hürlimann. 2018. Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: An evidence-based review. F1000Research 7:1925. doi:10.12688/f1000research.17328.2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suber, P. 2012. Open Access Overview.Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10752204.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor and Francis. What are the gold and green open access publishing options? Accessed December 10, 2021. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/publishing-open-access/oa-green-gold/#
   Google Scholar
• University of Arkansas–Fayetteville. 2021. College of Engineering faculty directory, University of Arkansas–Fayetteville. Accessed September 5, 2021. https://engineering.uark.edu/directory/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Xia, J. 2012. Diffusionism and open access. Journal of Documentation 68 (2):72–99. doi:10.1108/00220411211200338.
   Google Scholar