Who Cites Whom and How It Impacts the Knowledge Production Process across Disciplines?: A Methodological Insight

References

• Ananiadou, S., P. Thompson, and R. Nawaz. 2013. Enhancing search: Events and their discourse context. In International conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics, 318–34. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Batista-Navarro, R., G. K. Theresa, C. Mihăilă, P. Thompson, R. Rak, R. Nawaz, I. Korkontzelos, and S. Ananiadou. 2013. Facilitating the analysis of discourse phenomena in an interoperable NLP platform. In International conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics, 559–71. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, V. D., J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008 (10): P10008. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgohain, D. J., S. Zakaria, and M. K. Verma. 2021. Cluster analysis and network visualization of global research on digital libraries during 2016–2020: A bibliometric mapping. Science & Technology Libraries 1–22. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2021.1993422.
   Google Scholar
• Boyack, K. W., H. Small, and R. Klavans. 2013. Improving the accuracy of co‐citation clustering using full text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (9):1759–67. doi:10.1002/asi.22896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, A., S. Hockema, and G. Eysenbach. 2010. Contextual cocitation: Augmenting cocitation analysis and its applications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (6):1130–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., F. Ibekwe‐sanjuan, and J. Hou. 2010. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple‐perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (7):1386–409. doi:10.1002/asi.21309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., G. Chowdhury, and S. Foo. 1999. Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: An author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997. Journal of Information Science 25 (1):67–78. doi:10.1177/016555159902500107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., G. Zhang, T. Chambers, M. Song, X. Wang, and C. Zhai. 2014. Content‐based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (9):1820–33. doi:10.1002/asi.23256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkiss, A., S. Shen, A. Fader, G. Erkan, D. States, and D. Radev. 2008. Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (1):51–62. doi:10.1002/asi.20707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, S. B. 1996. Mapping the intellectual structure of research in decision support systems through author cocitation analysis (1971–1993). Decision Support Systems 16 (4):315–38. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(95)00026-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, S. 2008. All author cocitation analysis and first author cocitation analysis: A comparative empirical investigation. Journal of Informetrics 2 (1):53–64. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eto, M. 2019. Extended co-citation search: Graph-based document retrieval on a co-citation network containing citation context information. Information Processing & Management 56 (6):102046. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, C. L., K. D. Bollacker, and S. Lawrence. 1998. CiteSeer: An automatic citation indexing system. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on digital libraries (Pittsburgh, PA, USA: ACM), 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Gipp, B., and J. Beel. 2009. Citation proximity analysis (CPA): A new approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In ISSI’09: 12th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (Brazil), 571–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, S.-U., A. Akram, and P. Haddawy. 2017. Identifying important citations using contextual information from full text ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), Toronto, Canada. In , vols. 1-8. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, S.-U., M. Imran, S. Iqbal, N. R. Aljohani, and R. Nawaz. 2018. Deep context of citations using machine-learning models in scholarly full-text articles. Scientometrics 117 (3):1645–62. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2944-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, P. J., P. M. Andersen, I. B. Nirenburg, and L. M. Schmandt. 1990. Tcs: A shell for content-based text categorization. In Sixth conference on artificial intelligence for applications, 320–26. Santa Barbara, CA, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., and S. C. Hui. 2002. Mining a web citation database for author co-citation analysis. Information Processing & Management 38 (4):491–508. doi:10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00046-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, T., and K.‐H. Chen. 2017. Yet another method for author co‐citation analysis: A new approach based on paragraph similarity. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54 (1):170–78. doi:10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401019.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, S., S.-U. Hassan, N. R. Aljohani, S. Alelyani, R. Nawaz, and L. Bornmann. 2021. A decade of in-text citation analysis based on natural language processing and machine learning techniques: An overview of empirical studies. Scientometrics 126 (8):6551–99. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04055-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, Y. K., M. Song, and Y. Ding. 2014. Content-based author co-citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics 8 (1):197–211. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., Y. K. Jeong, and M. Song. 2016. Content-and proximity-based author co-citation analysis using citation sentences. Journal of Informetrics 10 (4):954–66. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., and C. Chen. 2011. The effects of co-citation proximity on co-citation analysis .Proceedings of ISSI Durban, South Africa. 474–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, K., and D. Wolfram. 2012. Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word‐based, topic‐based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (10):1973–86. doi:10.1002/asi.22628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacRoberts, M. H., and B. R. MacRoberts. 1984. The negational reference: Or the art of dissembling. Social Studies of Science 14 (1):91–94. doi:10.1177/030631284014001006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCain, K. W. 1990. Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1986-1998) 41 (6):433. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<433::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakov, P. I., A. S. Schwartz, and M. Hearst. 2004. Citances: Citation sentences for semantic analysis of bioscience text. Proceedings of SIGIR, Sheffield, UK, vol. 4, 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, F., J. Bobadilla, A. Gutiérrez, R. Hurtado, and L. Xin. 2018. Artificial intelligence scientific documentation dataset for recommender systems. IEEE Access 6:48543–55. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2867731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, O. 2001. All author citations versus first author citations. Scientometrics 50 (2):339–44. doi:10.1023/A:1010534009428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pride, D., and P. Knoth. 2017. Incidental or influential?–A decade of using text-mining for citation function classification 16th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, 16-20 Oct Wuhan. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01179-16.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, A., S. Robertson, and S. Teufel. 2008. Comparing citation contexts for information retrieval Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on information and knowledge management, Napa Valley, California, USA. 213–22.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., B. Larsen, and P. Ingwersen. 2009. A comparative study of first and all-author co-citation counting, and two different matrix generation approaches applied for author co-citation analyses. Scientometrics 80 (1):103–30. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2019-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shardlow, M., R. Batista-Navarro, P. Thompson, R. Nawaz, J. McNaught, and S. Ananiadou. 2018. Identification of research hypotheses and new knowledge from scientific literature. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 18 (1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s12911-018-0639-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, H. 1973. Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (4):265–69. doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, H. 2011. Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: A preliminary investigation. Scientometrics 87 (2):373–88. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0349-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teufel, S., A. Siddharthan, and D. Tidhar. 2006. Automatic classification of citations function Proceedings of the 2006 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing Sydney, Australia. 103–10.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., R. Nawaz, J. McNaught, and S. Ananiadou. 2017. Enriching news events with meta-knowledge information. Language Resources and Evaluation 51 (2):409–38. doi:10.1007/s10579-016-9344-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, M., V. Ha, and O. Etzioni. 2015. Identifying meaningfull citations Workshops at the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. D. 2003. Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (5):423–34. doi:10.1002/asi.10228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. D., and B. C. Griffith. 1981. Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32 (3):163–71. doi:10.1002/asi.4630320302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. D., and K. W. McCain. 1998. Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (4):327–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, A., and Y. Ye. 2021. Bibliometric analysis on bibliometric-based ontology research. Science & Technology Libraries 40 (4):435–53. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2021.1920555.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Y. Zheng, X. Cai, H. Dai, D. Mu, L. Guo, and T. Dai. 2018. A LSTM based model for personalized context-aware citation recommendation. IEEE Access 6:59618–27. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2872730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Y. Ding, and M. Staša. 2013. Citation content analysis (CCA): A framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (7):1490–503. doi:10.1002/asi.22850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, D. 2006. Towards all-author co-citation analysis. Information Processing & Management 42 (6):1578–91. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., and E. Logan. 2002. Citation analysis using scientific publications on the Web as data source: A case study in the XML research area. Scientometrics 54 (3):449–72. doi:10.1023/A:1016090601710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., and A. Strotmann. 2011. Counting first, last, or all authors in citation analysis: A comprehensive comparison in the highly collaborative stem cell research field. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 (4):654–76. doi:10.1002/asi.21495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., and E. D. Kolaczyk. 2022. Discussion of ‘co-citation and co-authorship networks of statisticians.’ Journal of Business & Economic Statistics Just-accepted 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., P. Turney, D. Lemire, and A. Vellino. 2015. Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (2):408–27. doi:10.1002/asi.23179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar