Gender Influence on Authorship Pattern: A Case Study

References

• http://op.niscair.res.in/index.php/ALIS/index. Accessed December 19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bibliometrics.
   Google Scholar
• Acedo, F. J., C. Barroso, C. Casanueva, and J. Luis Galan. 2006. Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis*. Journal of Management Studies 43 (5):957–83. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrighi-Allisan, A. E., D. C. Shukla, A. M. Meyer, S. M. Kidwai, S. H. Barazani, M. K. Cosetti, and M. S. Teng. 2020. Gender trends in authorship of original otolaryngology publications: A fifteen-year perspective. The Laryngoscope 130 (9):2126–32. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/LARY.28372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baro, E. E., O. Oni, and G. O. Onyenania. 2009. Gender and publication output of librarians in edo and Delta state university libraries in Nigeria. Performance Measurement and Metrics 10 (3):180–92. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/14678040911014185.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, D. D., and R. Rosen. 1978. Studies in scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 1 (1):65–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besselaar, P. V. D., and U. Sandstrom. 2017. Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact. PLoS One 12 (8):e0183301. Public Library of Science. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0183301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Bibliometrics Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster.” 1828. Accessed January 7 2023. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bibliometrics
   Google Scholar
• Bisaria, G. 2018. DESIDOC journal of library and information technology: A gender perspective. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology 38 (6):410–15. Defence Scientific Information and Documentation Centre. doi:10.14429/DJLIT.38.6.13238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, D., and J. Stadmark. 2012. A call to commission more women writers. Nature 488 (7413):590. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/488590a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costas, R., and M. Bordons. 2011. Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics 88 (1):145–61. Akadémiai Kiadó, co-published with Springer Science+Business Media B.V., Formerly Kluwer Academic Publishers B.V. doi:10.1007/S11192-011-0368-Z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson, B. 2011. Women as authors in the pharmacy literature: 1989–2009. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 68 (18):18–391736–39. Oxford Academic. doi:10.2146/AJHP100597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feramisco, J. D., J. J. Leitenberger, S. I. Redfern, A. Bian, X. J. Xie, and J. S. Resneck. 2009. A gender gap in the dermatology literature? Cross-sectional analysis of manuscript authorship trends in dermatology journals during 3 decades. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 60 (1):63–69. Mosby. doi:10.1016/J.JAAD.2008.06.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. W., C. S. Burns, A. D. Muncy, and J. A. Meyer. 2016. Gender differences in patterns of authorship do not affect peer review outcomes at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology 30 (1):1–39126–39. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingras, Y., V. Larivière, B. Macaluso, and J. P. Robitaille. 2008. The effects of aging on researchers’ publication and citation patterns. PLoS One 3 (12):e4048. Public Library of Science. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0004048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, S., T. A. Shah, S. N. Hamade, R. Mushtaq, and I. Koul. 2016. Effects of gender in library and information science research: A case study of the electronic library. Electronic Library 34 (3):488–503. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. doi:10.1108/EL-08-2014-0126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, L., D. Stuart-Fox, and C. E. Hauser. 2018. The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS biology 16 (4):e2004956. Public Library of Science. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.2004956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley, V., E. Teijlingen, and P. Simkhada. 2013. Academic authorship: Who, why and in what order? Health Renaissance 11 (2):99–101. http://www.biomedcentral.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Jagsi, R., E. A. Guancial, C. C. Worobey, L. E. Henault, Y. Chang, R. Starr, N. J. Tarbell, and E. M. Hylek. 2006. The ‘Gender Gap’ in authorship of academic medical literature — A 35-year perspective. The New England Journal of Medicine 355 (3):281–87. Retrieved from nejm.org on January 25, 2023. Massachusetts Medical Society. doi:10.1056/NEJMSA053910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., C. Ni, Y. Gingras, B. Cronin, and C. R. Sugimoto. 2013. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature 504 (7479):211–13. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/504211a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Y. Yin, W. Liu, and M. Dunford. 2015. Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 103 (1):135–58. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. 2004. The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review 69 (2):213–38. doi:10.1177/000312240406900204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narin, F. 1976. Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, 334–37. New Jersey: Computer Horizons.
   Google Scholar
• Negi, U. 2018. Research productivity and gender: A study of annals of library and information studies. Research Productivity and Gender: A Study of Annals of Library and Information Studies 4 (2):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Okiy, R. B. 2003. A comparative analysis of the characteristics of authors in four Nigerian librarianship journals. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science 13 (1):55–64. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajlais/article/view/26076.
   Google Scholar
• Olsgaard, J. N., and J. K. Olsgaard. 2000. Authoring in five library periodicals. College and Research Libraries 41 (91):49–53. doi:10.5860/crl_41_01_49.
   Google Scholar
• Price, D. J. D. S. 1963. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/pric91844.
   Google Scholar
• Rigg Lesley, S., S. McCarragher, and A. Krmenec. 2012. Authorship, collaboration, and gender: Fifteen years of publication productivity in selected geography journals. The Professional Geographer 64 (4):491–502. doi:10.1080/00330124.2011.611434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu, R., P. Rajashekhar, V. L. Lavin, J. Parry, J. Attwood, A. Holdcroft, and D. S. Sanders. 2009. The gender imbalance in academic medicine: A study of female authorship in the United Kingdom. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 102 (8):337–42. SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2009.080378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. C. 1981. Citation analysis. Library Trends. 83–106. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/7190/?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor & Francis. 2017. Co-authorship in the humanities and social sciences a global view. 1-20. Accessed August 19. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Coauthorship-white-paper.pd.
   Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M. A. 2020. Authorship and citation gender trends in immunology and microbiology. FEMS Microbiology Letters 367 (2):21. Oxford Academic. doi:10.1093/FEMSLE/FNAA021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uriona Maldonado, Mauricio, Vaz, Caroline 2017 The evolution of sustainability transitions and technological innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis 15th Globelics International Conference Athens, Greece 11-13 october
   Google Scholar
• van den Besselaar, P., and U. Sandstrom. 2017. Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact. PLoS One 12 (8):e0183301. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J. D., J. Jacquet, M. M. King, S. J. Correll, and C. T. Bergstrom. 2013. The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS One 8 (7):66212. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren, J. D., K. Z. Kozak, K. R. Johnson, S. J. Deakyne, L. M. Schilling, and R. P. Dellavalle. 2007. European Molecular Biology Organization 8 (11):988–91. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401095.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., and K. A. Shauman. 1998. Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American sociological review 63 (6):847–70. American Sociological Association. doi:10.2307/2657505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar