What is a “Great Neighborhood”? An Analysis of APA's Top-Rated Places

References

• Aitken, S. C. (2000). Mothers, communities and the scale of difference. Social & Cultural Geography, 1(1), 65–82. doi:10.1080/14649369950133494
   Google Scholar
• American Planning Association. (2014). Great places in America: Neighborhoods. Retrieved from https://www.planning.org/greatplaces/neighborhoods/characteristics.htm
   Google Scholar
• Appler, D. (2015). Affordable housing in National Register Districts: Recognizing the advantages of historic urban neighborhoods in -Louisville and Covington, Kentucky, USA. Journal of Urbanism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17549175.2015.1056209
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., Gannon, M., Kearns, A., Livingston, M., & Leyland, A. H. (2013). Living apart, losing sympathy? How neighbourhood context affects attitudes to redistribution and to welfare recipients. Environment and Planning A, 45(9), 2154–2175. doi:10.1068/a45641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, T., & Baer, W. C. (1984). Beyond the neighborhood unit: Residential environments and public policy. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beatley, T., & Manning, K. (1997). The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy, and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, M. (2007). Designer neighbourhoods: New-build residential development in nonmetropolitan UK cities—The case of Bristol. Environment and Planning A, 39(1), 86–105. doi:10.1068/a39144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. de S. (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cebula, R. J. (2009). The hedonic pricing model applied to the housing market of the city of Savannah and its Savannah Historic Landmark District. Review of Regional Studies, 39(1), 9–22. Retrieved from http://journal.srsa.org/ojs/index.php/RRS/article/view/182
   Google Scholar
• Chapple, K. (2009). Mapping susceptibility to gentrification: The early warning toolkit. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Center for Community Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. (2005). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. Retrieved from http://www.equality-of-opportunity.org/images/mto_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cortright, J. (2009). How walkability raises home values in U.S. cities. Retrieved from http://blog.walkscore.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/WalkingTheWalk_CEOsforCities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. E. (Ed). (2010). The community land trust reader. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1991). The advisory commission on regulatory barriers to affordable housing: Its behavior and accomplishments. Housing Policy Debate, 2(4), 1095–1137. doi:10.1080/10511482.1991.9521082
   Google Scholar
• Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2010). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream (10th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. (2005). Displacement or succession? Residential mobility in gentrifying neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), 463–491. doi:10.1177/1078087404273341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geolytics, Inc. (2014). Neighborhood Change Database 1970–2010 tract data. Branchburg, NJ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., Riggs, W. W., & Meares, W. L. (2015). Does walkability matter? An examination of walkability's impact on housing values, foreclosures and crime. Cities, 42 ;(Part A), 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S. (2002). Putting faith in neighborhoods: Making cities work through grassroots citizenship. Noblesville, IN: Hudson Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2014). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design since 1880 (4th ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, R., Brooks, A., & Nedwick, T. (2009). Preserving affordability and access in livable communities: Subsidized housing opportunities near transit and the 50+ population. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Haughey, R., & Sherriff, R. (2010). Challenges and policy options for creating and preserving affordable housing near transit and in other location-efficient areas. Washington, DC: Reconnecting America. Retrieved from http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/resource-center/browse-research/2011/challenges-and-policy-options-for-creating-and-preserving-affordable-housing-near-transit-and-in-other-location-efficient-areas/
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. W., & Seneca, J. J. (2004). The beginning of the end of sprawl? (Rutgers Regional Report, Issue Paper No. 21). New Brunswick, NJ: Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ijla, A., Ryberg, S., Rosentraub, M. S., & Bowen, W. (2011). Historic designation and the rebuilding of neighborhoods: new evidence of the value of an old policy tool. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 4(3), 263–284. doi:10.1080/17549175.2011.635262
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Larice, M. A. (2005). Great neighborhoods: The livability and morphology of high density neighborhoods in urban North America (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (Order No. 3211411)
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, J. (2009). The effect of ethnic diversity and community disadvantage on social cohesion: A multi-level analysis of social capital and interethnic relations in UK communities. European Sociological Review, 27(1), 70–89. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? Urban Studies, 45(12), 2449–2470. doi:10.1177/0042098008097099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, B., Lee, B., & Lipton, G. (1986). The determinants of gentrification in the United States: A city-level analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 21(3), 369–387. doi:10.1177/004208168602100307
   Google Scholar
• Maher, T., Haas, A., Levine, B., & Liell, J. (1985). Whose neighborhood? The role of established residents in historic preservation areas. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 21(2), 267–281. doi:10.1177/004208168502100208
   Google Scholar
• McGirr, E., Skaburskis, A., & Donegani, T. S. (2015). Expectations, preferences and satisfaction levels among new and long-term residents in a gentrifying Toronto neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 52(1), 3–19. doi:10.1177/0042098014522721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, S. G. (2001). As long as they don't move next door: Segregation and racial conflict in American neighborhoods. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, W. (2013). Five. In E. Talen & Congress for the New Urbanism (Eds.), Charter of the New Urbanism (2nd ed., pp. 57–61). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Moudon, A. V. (2013). Street connections. In E. Talen and <s>Congress for the New Urbanism</s> (Eds.), Charter of the New Urbanism (2nd ed., pp. 122–123). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Moudon, A. V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A. D., Garvin, C. W., Johnson, D. B., Schmid, T. L., & Weathers, R. D. (2007). Attributes of environments supporting walking. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21(5), 448–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C. (2012). Reshaping metropolitan America: Trends and opportunities to 2030. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, K., & Wyly, E. (2006). The right to stay put, revisited: Gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies, 43(1), 23–57. doi:10.1080/00420980500388710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(2), 125–142. doi:10.1080/01944360008976094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., & Caruthers, J. I. (2003). Does density exacerbate income segregation? Evidence from U.S. metropolitan areas, 1980 to 2000. Housing Policy Debate, 14(4), 541–589. doi:10.1080/10511482.2003.9521487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C. A. (1929). Neighborhood and community planning (Regional Survey of New York and Its Environs v.7). New York, NY: Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, B. (2005). Affordable housing—Toward zero energy (Report 0507). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Building Science Press. Retrieved from http://www.buildingscienceconsulting.com/presentations/documents/Affordable_Housing_Toward_Zero_Energy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rauterkus, S. Y., & Miller, N. G. (2011). Residential land values and walkability. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 3(1), 23–43. Retrieved from http://www.josre.org/josre-issues/
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, W. W. (2011). Walkability and housing: A comparative study of income, neighborhood change and socio-cultural dynamics in the San Francisco Bay area. eScholarship. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5970164x
   Google Scholar
• Ryberg-Webster, S., & Kinahan, K. L. (2014). Historic preservation and urban revitalization in the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature, 29(2), 119–139. Retrieved from http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=444AB5EEE79EB104FFDE
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, S. (1976). The idea of social mix in town planning: An historical overview. Urban Studies 13(3), 231–246. doi:10.1080/00420987620080521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, C. (1985). Neighborhood planning in historical perspective. Journal of the American Planning Association, 51(2), 161–174. doi:10.1080/01944368508976207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. M. (2007). Reassessing dentrification: Measuring residents’ opinions using survey data. Urban Affairs Review, 42(4), 583–592. doi:10.1177/1078087406295828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tach, L., Pendall, R., & Derian, A. (2014). Income mixing across scales: Rationale, trends, policies, practice, and research for more inclusive neighborhoods and metropolitan areas. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/publications/412998.html
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2010). Affordability in new urbanist development: Principle, practice, and strategy. Journal of Urban Affairs. 32(4), 489–510. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00518.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E., & Koschinsky, J. (2014). The neighborhood quality of subsidized housing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(1), 67–82. doi:10.1080/01944363.2014.935232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, J. (2008, August 24). Home, small home: 250 square feet in SoMa/New condo development targets young first-time buyers without too much stuff. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Home-small-home-250-square-feet-in-SoMa-3271925.php
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E., Rosenbaum, D., & Schmitz, B. (2011). Property values on the plains: The impact of historic preservation. Annals of Regional Science, 47(2), 477–491. doi:10.1007/s00168-010-0373-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.-Y. G., Knox, K. J., & Hite, G. E. (2013). The impact of historical designation on property values before and following Hurricane Ike: The case of Galveston Texas. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 19(3), 225–234. Retrieved from http://login.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1506937920?accountid=4485
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. (1991). Gentrification as consumption: Issues of class and gender. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 9(2), 223–232. doi:10.1068/d090223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, E. (2013). Role of walkability in driving home values. Leadership & Management in Engineering, 13(3), 123–130. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000222
   Google Scholar