Testing a Mature Hypothesis: Reflection on “Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities: Urban Planning and the Contradiction of Sustainable Development”

References

• Agyeman, J., & Angus. B. (2003). The role of civic environmentalism in the pursuit of sustainable communities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(3), 345–363. doi:10.1080/0964056032000096901
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. D. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312. doi:10.1080/01944369608975696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J., Oliver, A., & Robinson, J. (2013). Regenerative design, socio-ecological systems and co-evolution. Building Research and Information, 41(2), 237–247. doi:10.1080/09613218.2013.747130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Essays in experimental logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• du Plessis, C., & Cole, R. J. (2011). Motivating change: Shifting the paradigm. Building Research & Information, 39(5), 436–449. doi:10.1080/09613218.2011.582697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 4(1), 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. P. (1995). Technological momentum. In M. R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history (pp. 101–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• John, D. (1993). Civic environmentalism: alternatives to regulation in states and communities. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• John, D. (1994). Civic environmentalism. Issues in Science and Technology, 10(4), 30–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, D. (2004). Civic environmentalism. In R. F. Durant, D. J. Fiorino, & R. O'Leary (Eds.), Environmental governance reconsidered: Challenges, choices, and opportunities (pp. 219–254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lanham, H. J., Jordan, M., & McDaniel, R. R., Jr. (2016). Sustainable development: Complexity, balance, and a critique of rational planning. In S. A. Moore (Ed.), Pragmatic sustainability: Dispositions for critical adaptation (pp. 49–66). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring science into democracy (C. Porter, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A. (2010). The moral journey of environmentalism: From witness to place. In S. A. Moore (Ed.), Pragmatic sustainability: Theoretical and practical tools (pp. 136–148). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, J. T. (1994). Regenerative design for sustainable development. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. A. (Ed.). (2016). Pragmatic sustainability: dispositions for critical adaptation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. A., & Walsh, E. (2012). Why go beyond LEED? Platform: The University of Texas at Austin School of Architecture, ( Fall), 8–21. http://soa.utexas.edu/publications/platform
   Google Scholar
• Oden, M. (2010). Equity: The forgotten E in sustainable development. In S. A. Moore (Ed.), Pragmatic sustainability: Theoretical and practical tools (pp. 30–49). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oden, M. (2016). Equity: The awkward E in sustainable development. In S. A. Moore (Ed.), Pragmatic sustainability: Dispositions for critical adaptation (pp. 30–47). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Picon, A. (2015). Smart cities: A spatialized intelligence. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, H., & Taylor, B. (2003). John Dewey's aesthetic ecology of public intelligence and the grounding of civic environmentalism. Ethics & the Environment 8(1), 74–92. http://www.phil.uga.edu/content/ethics-environment-journal-0
   Google Scholar
• Resilience Alliance. (2001). Resilience Alliance [website]. Retrieved from http://www.resalliance.org/
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., & Cole, R. J. (2014). Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability. Building Research & Information, 43(2), 1–11. doi:10.1080/09613218.2014.979082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (Eds.). 1994. Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svec, P., Berkebile, R., & Todd, J. A. (2012). REGEN: Toward a tool for regenerative thinking. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 81–94. doi:10.1080/09613218.2012.629112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (2016). The many meanings of sustainability: A competing paradigms approach. In S. A. Moore (Ed.), Pragmatic sustainability: Dispositions for critical adaptation (pp. 16–28). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. M. (2014). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, E., & Moore, S. A. (2015). Redefining the limits of architectural judgment. In W. F. E. Preiser, A. T. Davis, & A. M. Salama (Eds.), Architecture beyond criticism: Expert judgment and performance evaluation (pp. 252–264). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar