Mobility Niches: Jitneys to Robo-Taxis

References

• Allen, G. (1976). An analysis of subsidy issues in public transportation. Traffic Quarterly, 30(4), 595–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2015). Commuting in America: The national report on commuting patterns and trends. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• AngelList. (2017). Public transportation startups. Retrieved from https://angel.co/public-transportation
   Google Scholar
• Barnum, D., & Gleason, J. (1979). Measuring the influence of subsidies on transit efficiency and effectiveness. Washington, DC: Urban Mass Transportation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Bernick, M., & Cervero, R. (1997). Transit villages for the 21st century. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Broberg, B. (2016, June 15). Where are the new jobs going? On Common Ground, pp. 4–6. Retrieved from https://www.nar.realtor/articles/where-are-the-new-jobs-going
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2015). Passenger travel facts and figures, 2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1983). Cost and performance effects of transit operating subsidies in the United States. International Journal of Transport Economics, 10(3), 535–562. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42748003
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1984). Revitalizing urban transit: More money or less regulation? Regulation, 8(3), 36–42. Retrieved from https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/1984/5/v8n3-6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1985). Deregulating urban transportation. The Cato Journal, 5(10), 219–238. Retrieved from https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1985/5/cj5n1-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1986). Suburban gridlock. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1997a). Electric station cars in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Quarterly, 51(2), 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1997b). Paratransit in America: Redefining mass transportation. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1998). The transit metropolis: A global inquiry. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (2000). Informal transport in the developing world. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Centre for Human Settlements.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (2001). Informal transit: Learning from the developing world. Access, 18, 15–22. Retrieved from http://www.accessmagazine.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/07/access18-03-informal-transit-learning-from-the-developing-world.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (2003). City CarShare: First-year travel demand impacts. Transportation Research Record, 1839, 159–166. doi:10.3141/1839-18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., Golub, A., & Nee, B. (2007). City CarShare: Longer-term travel-demand and car ownership impacts. Transportation Research Record, 1992, 70–80. doi:10.3141/1992-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., Round, A., Reed, C., & Clark, B. (1994). The all-electric commute: An assessment of the market potential for station cars in the San Francisco Bay Area (Working Paper No. 628). Berkeley: National Transit Access Center, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Tsai, Y. (2004). City CarShare in San Francisco, California: Second-year travel demand and car ownership impacts. Transportation Research Record, 1887, 117–127. doi:10.3141/1887-14
   Google Scholar
• Davis, O., & Johnson, N. (1984). The jitneys: A study of grassroots capitalism. Journal of Contemporary Studies, 4(1), 81–102.
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy, R. (2001). Transit trends. Urban Land, 60(5), 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Dutzik, T., Inglis, J., & Baxandall, P. (2014). Millennials in motion: Changing travel habits of young Americans and implications for public policy. Washington, DC: US PIRG (Public Interest Research Group) Education Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Ekert, R., & Hilton, G. (1972). The jitneys. Journal of Law and Economics, 15(2), 293–325. doi:10.1086/466738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, A., & De Rouville, M. (1988). The potential of the jitney: A case study of the Baltimore metropolitan area. Transportation Quarterly, 42(1), 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Frankena, M., & Paulter, P. (1984). An economic analysis of taxicab regulation. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, P. (1983). Effects of taxi regulatory revision in Seattle, Washington; San Diego, California; Portland, Oregon. Washington, DC: Urban Mass Transportation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G., & Samuels, R. (1982). The taxicab: An urban transportation survivor. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Ibanez, J. (1976). Assessing the arguments for urban transit operating subsidies. Transportation Research Record, 573, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, A. (2016, March 16). Uber and Lyft just got a big boost from the public transportation world. The Verge. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/16/11248412/uber-lyft-APTA-public-transportation-study-last-mile
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren, J. (2007). Meta-analysis of public transit demand. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(10), 1021–1035. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. (2015). A new paradigm for urban mobility: How fleets of shared vehicles can end the car dependency of cities. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, International Transport Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, T., Petrovic, S., Ayyer, U., Tolani, A., & Husain, S. (2015). Self-driving cars: Disruptive or incremental? Applied Innovation Review, 1, 1–20. Retrieved from http://scet.berkeley.edu/applied-innovation-review/
   Google Scholar
• Juday, L. (2015). The changing shape of American cities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, Demographics Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.coopercenter.org/sites/default/files/node/13/ChangingShape-AmericanCities_UVACooperCenter_March2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, R., Bhatt, K., & Kemp, M. (1974). Paratransit: Neglected options for urban mobility. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kitch, E., Issacson, M., & Kasper, D. (1971). The regulation of taxicabs in Chicago. Journal of Law and Economics, 14(2), 285–350. doi:10.1086/466712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2015). The future isn’t what it used to be: Changing trends and their implications for transportation planning. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/future.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morlok, E., & Viton, P. (1985). The comparative costs of public and private providers of mass transit. In C. Lave (Ed.), Urban transit (pp. 233–254). San Francisco, CA: Pacific Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner, J., & Wachs, M. (1979). The cost-revenue squeeze in American public transit. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(1), 10–21. doi:10.1080/01944367908976934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickrell, D. (1985). Rising deficits and the use of transit subsidies in the United States. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 19(3), 281–298. Retrieved from http://www.bath.ac.uk/e-journals/jtep/pdf/Volume_X1X_No_3_281-298.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher, J. (1982). Effects of subsidies on transit costs. Transportation Quarterly, 37, 549–562.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J. (2002). Renaissance of public transit in the U.S.? Transportation Quarterly, 56(1), 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R., & Shaheen, S. (2016). Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy, 45, 168–178. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Rideshare Guy. (2016, February 10). Why did Sidecar fail? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://therideshareguy.com/category/sidecar
   Google Scholar
• Roth, G., & Wynne, G. (1982). Learning from abroad: Free enterprise urban transportation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sale, J., & Green, B. (1979). Operating costs and performance of American public transit systems. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(1), 22–27. doi:10.1080/01944367908976935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savas, E. (1982). Privatizing the public sector: How to shrink government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. (2012). Describing and illustrating the Extended Transit Oriented Development (E-TOD) concept. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/jbs/itrans/e-tod.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sivak, M., & Schoettle, B. (2016). Recent decreases in the proportion of persons with a driver’s license across all age groups (UMTRI-2016-5). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/∼umtriswt/PDF/UMTRI-2016-4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Statista. (2016). Average number of people per household in the United States from 1960 to 2016. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/183648/average-size-of-households-in-the-us/.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, P. (1995). Unregulated taxicabs. Transportation Quarterly, 49(1), 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., Blumenberg, E., Brown, A., Ralph, K., & Voulgaris, C. (2015). Typecasting neighborhoods and travelers: Analyzing the geography of travel behavior among teens and young adults in the U.S. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles Luskin School of Public Affairs, Institute of Transportation Studies. Retrieved from http://www.lewis.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/10/Geography-of-Youth-Travel_Final-Report.pdf?mc_cid=68d255b9a1&mc_eid=cc6e1ea4c7
   Google Scholar
• Teal, R. (1986). Transportation privatization: Experiences and issues. Urban Resources, 4(1), 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (1980). 1980 census: STF 4Pa, sample-based detailed population data, Table NTPA17: Country of birth. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (1990). 1990 census: STF 4a, sample-based detailed data, Table NPA23: Place of birth. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). 2000 census: SF 3a, sample-based data, Table NPCT019B: Foreign-born population by place of birth. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 census: SF 1a, P & H tables, Table P28: Household types by household size. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). 2012 American Community Survey: 5-year data, Table B05006: Place of birth for the foreign-born population in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Valletta, R., & van der List, C. (2015, June). Involuntary part-time work: Here to stay? San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Retrieved from http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/el2015-19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wachs, R. (1976). Consumer attitudes toward transit services: An interpretative review. Journal of the American Institute for Planners, 42(1), 96–104. doi:10.1080/01944367608977708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, R. (1997). The urban oasis: Guideways and greenways in the human environment. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, M. (1994). The marriage of autos and transit: How to make transit popular again. Access, 5, 26–31. Retrieved from http://www.accessmagazine.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/07/access05-05-The-Marriage-of-Autos-and-Transit.pdf
   Google Scholar