Estimates of Transaction Costs in Transfer of Development Rights Programs

References

• American Farmland Trust. (2008). Fact sheet: Transfer of development rights. Northampton, MA: Farmland Information Center.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, R. (2004). Linked landscapes: Creating greenway corridors through conservation subdivision design strategies in the northeastern and central United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(2–3), 241–269. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00157-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruening, A. D. (2008). The TDR siren song: The problems with transferable development rights programs and how to fix them. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 23(2), 423–440. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42842995
   Google Scholar
• Chomitz, K. M. (2004). Transferable development rights and forest protection: An exploratory analysis. International Regional Science Review, 27(3), 348–373. doi:10.1177/0160017604266030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinch, J. P., & O’Neill, E. (2010). Assessing the relative merits of development charges and transferable development rights in an uncertain world. Urban Studies, 47(4), 891–911. doi:10.1177/0042098009352365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinch, J. P., O’Neill, E., & Russell, P. (2008). “Pure” and “impure” Coasian solutions in planning. Town Planning Review, 79(6), 623–649. doi:10.3828/tpr.79.6.3
   Google Scholar
• Coggan, A., van Grieken, M., Boullier, A., & Jardi, X. (2015). Private transaction costs of participation in water quality improvement programs for Australia's Great Barrier Reef: Extent, causes and policy implications. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 59(4), 499–517. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggan, A., Whitten, S. M., & Bennett, J. (2010). Influences of transaction costs in environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1777–1784. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danner, J. C. (1997). TDRs: Great idea but questionable value. Appraisal Journal, 65(2), 133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Dehart, H. G., & Etgen, R. (2007). The feasibility of successful TDR programs for Maryland's Eastern Shore. Annapolis, MD: Maryland Center for Agro-Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer, K., & Saunders, C. (2002). Transaction costs for SSSIs and policy design. Land Use Policy, 19(2), 157–166. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F., Easter, K. W., & Brezonik, P. L. (2005). Point-nonpoint source water quality trading: A case study in the Minnesota River basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(3), 645–657. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03761.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, M. (1987). Over-stuffing the envelope: The problems with creative transfer of development rights. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 16(1), 43–67. Retrieved from https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1314&context=ulj
   Google Scholar
• Howitt, R. E. (1994). Empirical analysis of water market institutions: The 1991 California water market. Resource and Energy Economics, 16(4), 357–371. doi:10.1016/0928-7655(94)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen-Jansen, L. B. (2008). Space for Space, a transferable development rights initiative for changing the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(3), 192–200. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen-Jansen, L., Spaans, M., & van der Veen, M. (2008). New instruments in spatial planning: An international perspective on non-­financial compensation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. A., & Madison, M. E. (1997). From land marks to landscapes: A review of current practices in the transfer of development rights. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(3), 365–378. doi:10.1080/01944369708975929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperan, K., Abdullah, N. M. R., Pomeroy, R. S., Genio, E. L., & Salamanca, A. M. (2008). Measuring transaction costs of fisheries co-management. Coastal Management, 36(3), 225–240. doi:10.1080/08920750701681991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, L. W. C. (1994). The economics of land-use zoning: A literature review and analysis of the work of Coase. Town Planning Review, 65(1), 77–98. doi:10.3828/tpr.65.1.j15rh7037v511127
   Google Scholar
• Linkous, E. R. (2016). Transfer of development rights in theory and practice: The restructuring of TDR to incentivize development. Land Use Policy, 51, 162–171. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryland Association of Counties. (2016). Report of county employee salaries, health benefits and pensions—fiscal year 2016. Annapolis, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Maryland Department of Planning. (2016). Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) committee report. Baltimore, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Maryland State Archives. (2017). Maryland manual on-line. Retrieved from http://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/html/mmtoc.html
   Google Scholar
• The Maryland State Data Center. (2015). Maryland 2010 urban and rural population by jurisdiction. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Department of Planning.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, L., Colby, B., Easter, K. W., Kasterine, A., & Kuperan, K. V. (2005). Transaction cost measurement for evaluating environmental policies. Ecological Economics, 52(4), 527–542. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, L., & Easter, K. W. (1999). Transaction costs of policies to reduce agricultural phosphorous pollution in the Minnesota River. Land Economics, 75(3), 402–414. doi:10.2307/3147186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, V., Walls, M., & Kelly, F. (2007). Markets for preserving farmland in Maryland: Making TDR programs work better. Queenstown, MD: Maryland Center for Agroecology.
   Google Scholar
• Messer, K. D. (2007). Transferable development rights programs: An economic framework for success. Journal of Conservation Planning, 3, 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Micelli, E. (2002). Development rights markets to manage urban plans in Italy. Urban Studies, 39(1), 141–154. doi:10.1080/00420980220099122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., Pruetz, R., & Woodruff, D. (2011). The TDR handbook: Designing and implementing transfer of development rights programs. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ofei-Mensah, A., & Bennett, J. (2013). Transaction costs of alternative greenhouse gas policies in the Australian transport energy sector. Ecological Economics, 88(0), 214–221. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Labourforce statistics: Average annual hours actually worked per worker. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCode=ANHRS
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, M. J., & Lapping, M. B. (1994). Farmland preservation, development rights and the theory of the growth machine: The views of planners. Journal of Rural Studies, 10(3), 233–248. doi:10.1016/0743-0167(94)90051-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruetz, R. (2003). Beyond takings and givings: Saving natural areas, farmland and historic landmarks with transfer of development rights and density transfer charges. Marina Del Rey, CA: Arje Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruetz, R. (2016). TDR updates. Retrieved from http://smartpreservation.net/tdr-updates/
   Google Scholar
• Pruetz, R., & Pruetz, E. (2007). Transfer of development rights turns 40. Planning & Environmental Law, 59(6), 3–11. doi:10.1080/15480755.2007.10394447
   Google Scholar
• Pruetz, R., & Standridge, N. (2008). What makes transfer of development rights work? Success factors from research and practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1), 78–87. doi:10.1080/01944360802565627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard, V. (2007). Property rights and the “transfer of development rights”: Questions of efficiency and equity. Town Planning Review, 78(1), 41–60. doi:10.2307/40112701
   Google Scholar
• Shahab, S., Clinch, J. P., & O’Neill, E. (in press). Timing and ­distributional aspects of transaction costs in transferable development rights programs. Habitat International.
   Google Scholar
• Shahab, S., Clinch, J. P., & O’Neill, E. (2018). Accounting for transaction costs in planning policy evaluation. Land Use Policy, 70, 263–272. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, M., & Chang, H. B. (2015). Transfer of development rights and public facility planning in Taiwan: An examination of local adaptation and spatial impact. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1244–1260. doi:10.1177/0042098015572974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, J. T. B., & Dudek, D. J. (1989). Institutional guidelines for designing successful transferable rights programs. Yale Journal on Regulation, 6(2), 369–391. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol6/iss2/10
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2012). Census of agriculture: Maryland, county summary highlights. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.
   Google Scholar
• Walls, M. A., & McConnell, V. D. (2007). Transfer of development rights in U.S. communities: Evaluating program design, implementation, and outcomes. Retrieved from http://conservationtools.org/library_items/263-Transfer-of-Development-Rights-in-U-S-Communities-Evaluating-program-design-implementation-and-outcomes
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Tao, R., Wang, L., & Su, F. (2010). Farmland preservation and land development rights trading in Zhejiang, China. Habitat International, 34(4), 454–463. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar