Evaluating Geodesign for Community-Based Tribal Planning

References

• Alwaer, H., & Cooper, I. (2019). A review of the role of facilitators in community-based, design-led planning and placemaking events. Built Environment, 45(2), 190–211. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.45.2.190
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, K., Blandford, B., Grossardt, T., & Ripy, J. (2011). Planning, technology, and legitimacy: Structured public involvement in integrated transportation and land-use planning in the United States. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(3), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. (2013). Defining Geodesign (= GIS + Design?). Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1068/b4001ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett Freeze Rehabilitation Act. (2004). H.R. 5168.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., Portney, K., & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blue, G., Rosol, M., & Fast, V. (2019). Justice as parity of participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1619476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges, J., Jankowski, P., & Davis, C. A. (2015) Crowdsourcing for Geodesign: Opportunities and challenges for stakeholder input in urban planning. In C. Robbi Sluter, C. B. Madureira Cruz, & P. M. Leal de Menezes (Eds.), Cartography—Maps connecting the world: 27th International Cartographic Conference 2015—ICC2015 (pp. 361–373). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_25
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209104824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D. R., & Burby, R. J. (2003). Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308978018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 381–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, E. (1979). A participatory approach to urban planning. Human Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., & Ragin (Eds.). (2009). The Sage handbook of case-based methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Campagna, M., Di Cesare, E. A., & Cocco, C. (2020). Integrating green-infrastructures design in strategic spatial planning with Geodesign. Sustainability, 12(5), 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canfield, M. R. (2011). Field notes on science and nature. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerreta, M., Inglese, P., & Manzi, M. L. (2016). A multi-methodological decision-making process for cultural landscapes evaluation: The Green Lucania Project. Urban Planning and Architectural Design for Sustainable Development (UPADSD), 216, 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.026
   Google Scholar
• Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831). 30 U.S. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Cocco, C., Rezende Freitas, C., Mourão Moura, A. C., & Campagna, M. (2019). Geodesign process analytics: Focus on design as a process and its outcomes. Sustainability, 12(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, S., & Kalt, J. P. (1998). Sovereignty and nation-building: The development challenge in Indian country today. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 22(3), 187–214. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicr.22.3.lv45536553vn7j78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., Pijawka, D., Wentz, E. A., & Hale, M. (2020). Evaluation of community-based land use planning through Geodesign: Application to American Indian communities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203, 103880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, D. (1997). Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept? Journal of Planning Literature, 11(3), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229701100309
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagence, M. (1977). Citizen participation in planning. Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2016). Participatory governance: From theory to practice. In S. S. Fainstein & J. Defillipis (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (4th ed., pp. 348–362). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fixico, D. (1998). The invasion of Indian country in the twentieth century: American capitalism and tribal natural resources (2nd ed.). University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, K. (2016). Geodesign parsed: Placing it within the rubric of recognized design theories. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, L. (2014). Making space for reconciliation in the planning system. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(4), 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.963650
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., & Pijawka, D. (2013). Review and recommendations for updating the community-based land use plans for the Navajo Nation. Office of the President.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1068/b230217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2010). Making better places: The planning project in the twenty-first century. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, P. (2011). Community planning: Integrating social and physical environments. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbard, M. (2006). Tribal sovereignty, the white problem, and reservation planning. Journal of Planning History, 5(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513206286237
   Google Scholar
• Hu, H., Lin, T., Wang, S., & Rodriguez, L. F. (2017). A cyberGIS approach to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in biomass supply chain optimization. Applied Energy, 203, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G. (2017). Protecting urban river views with Geodesign approach. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2, 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G., & Zhou, N. (2016). Geodesign in developing countries: The example of the master plan for Wulingyuan National Scenic Area, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulse, D., Branscomb, A., Enright, C., Johnson, B., Evers, C., Bolte, J., & Ager, A. (2016). Anticipating surprise: Using agent-based alternative futures simulation modeling to identify and map surprising fires in the Willamette Valley, Oregon, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. (1988). 25 U.S.C. § 2703.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Reorganization Act. (1934). 25 U.S.C. 476.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act. (1975). 25 U.S.C. § 450, Pub. L. 93–638.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson v. M’Intosh. (1823). 21 U.S. 543.
   Google Scholar
• Jojola, T. (2008). Indigenous planning—An emerging context. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 17(1), 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Jojola, T. (2013). Indigenous planning: Towards a seven generations model. In R. Walker, T. Jojola, and D. Natcher (Eds.), Reclaiming Indigenous planning (pp. 457–472). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalvelage, K., Dorneich, M. C., Seeger, C. J., Welk, G. J., Gilbert, S., Moon, J., Jafir, I., & Brown, P. (2018). Assessing the validity of facilitated-volunteered geographic information: Comparisons of expert and novice ratings. GeoJournal, 83(3), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-017-9781-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2017). Teaching coastal resilience using Geodesign: A study of Virginia Beach. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2, 279–286. https://doi.org/10.14627/537629029
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, M., Bailey, K., Wei, F., Fowler, J., Tong, D., Zhong, Q., Lopez, O., & Sheaffer, W. (2018). Collaborative Geodesign for alternative-fuel station location using “Collablocation” software. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(24), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118790375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V. (2012). 101 design methods: A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., & Shaw, M. M. (2009). Evaluation of public participation: The practices of certified planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08326532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Milburn, L.-A. (2016). The evolution of geodesign as a design and planning tool. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. (2012). The three historic currents of city planning. In G. Bridge, & S. Watson (Eds.), The new Blackwell companion to the city (pp. 643–655). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Matunga, H. (2013). Theorizing indigenous planning. In R. Walker, T. Jojola, and D. Natcher (Eds.), Reclaiming indigenous planning (pp. 3–34). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElvaney, S. (2012). Geodesign: Case studies in regional and urban planning. Environmental Research Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• McHarg, I. (1995). Design with nature (25th ed.). Wiley. (Original work published 1969)
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. J. (2013). Reservation capitalism: Economic development in Indian country. University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno Marimbaldo, J. F., Manso-Callejo, M.-Á., & Alcarria, R. (2018). A methodological approach to using Geodesign in transmission line projects. Sustainability, 10(8), 2757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navajo Nation Local Governance Act, no. Title 26, Navajo Nation. (1998). http://www.grandcanyontrust.org/sites/default/files/na_lga.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norton, R. K., Buckman, S., Meadows, G. A., & Rable, Z. (2019). Using simple, decision-centered, scenario-based planning to improve local coastal management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(4), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1627237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyerges, T., Ballal, H., Steinitz, C., Canfield, T., Roderick, M., Ritzman, J., & Thanatemaneerat, W. (2016). Geodesign dynamics for sustainable urban watershed development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 25, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulahen, G., & Doberstein, B. (2012). Citizen participation in post-disaster flood hazard mitigation planning in Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/1944-4079.1098
   Google Scholar
• Patton, J. (1999). Qualitative evaluation methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, D. (2000). The teacher and town planner as facilitator. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/135580000750052982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkl, R. M. (2016). Geodesigning landscape linkages: Coupling GIS with wildlife corridor design in conservation planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, C. J., Hawken, S., Ticzon, C., Leao, S. Z., Afrooz, A. E., Lieske, S. N., Canfield, T., Ballal, H., & Steinitz, C. (2019). Breaking down the silos through geodesign: Envisioning Sydney’s urban future. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(8), 1387–1404. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318812887
   Google Scholar
• Rich, R. C. (1986). Neighborhood-based participation in the planning process: Promise and reality. In R. B. Taylor (Ed.), Urban neighborhoods: Research and policy. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. J., Maclean, K., Hill, R., Bock, E., & Rist, P. (2016). Participatory mapping to negotiate indigenous knowledge used to assess environmental risk. Sustainability Science, 11(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0292-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepardson, M. (1963). Navajo ways in government: A study in political process. American Anthropological Association Memoir 96. The American Anthropological Association, ix.
   Google Scholar
• Slotterback, C. S., & Lauria, M. (2019). Building a foundation for public engagement in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1616985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, F. R., & Shearer, A. W. (2016). Geodesign—Changing the world, changing design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinitz, C. (2012). A framework for Geodesign: Changing geography by design. Environmental Research Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinitz, C. (2014). Which way of designing? In D. J. Lee, E. Dias, & H. J. Scholten (Eds.), Geodesign by integrating design and geospatial sciences (pp. 11–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_2
   Google Scholar
• Teufel-Shone, N. I., & Williams, S. (2010). Focus groups in small communities. Preventing Chronic Disease, 7(3), A67–A67. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20394706/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W. (1998). Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration & Society, 30(2), 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399798302003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. M. (2008). The minority-race planner in the quest for a just city. Planning Theory, 7(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208094822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). The American Indian and Alaska Native Population: 2010. https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R., Jojola, T., & Natcher, D. (2013). Reclaiming indigenous planning. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, R. C. (1992). The spirits will leave: Preventing the desecration and destruction of Native American sacred sites on federal land. Ecology Law Quarterly, 19(4), 796–843. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38FZ56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D. E. (2013). The Navajo political experience. Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. W. (2015). On the criticality of mapping practices: Geodesign as critical GIS? Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissen Hayek, U., von Wirth, T., Neuenschwander, N., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2016). Organizing and facilitating Geodesign processes: Integrating tools into collaborative design processes for urban transformation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worcester V. Georgia. (1832). 31 U.S. 515.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2015). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1995). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 120–135). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. W. (1978). A political history of the Navajo tribe. Navajo Community College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaferatos, N. (1996). Political sovereignty in Native American community development: Implications for tribal planning strategies. University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaferatos, N. (1998). Planning the Native American tribal community: Understanding the basis of power controlling the reservation territory. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(4), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808976000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaferatos, N. (2015). Planning the American Indian reservation: From theory to empowerment. Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar