Planning as Bargaining

References

• Allred, D., & Chakraborty, A. (2015). Do local development outcomes follow voluntary regional plans? Evidence From Sacramento region’s Blueprint plan. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(2), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1067574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. H. (2019). Modeling effective local government climate policies that exceed state targets. Energy Policy, 132, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson-Palombo, C., & Kuby, M. J. (2011). The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000–2007. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Joseph, E. (2003). Subdivision regulations: Practices & attitudes. A survey of public officials and developers in the nation’s fastest growing single family housing markets [Working Paper]. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. http://web.mit.edu/ebj/www/LincolnWP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boarnet, M. G., & Compin, N. S. (1999). Transit-oriented development in San Diego County: The incremental implementation of a planning idea. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho, A. E. (2005). Mustering the missing voices: A collaborative model for fostering equality, community involvement and adaptive planning in land use decisions. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 24(1), 3–70.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. (2008). Performance measurement in planning: Towards a holistic view. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(2), 428–454. https://doi.org/10.1068/c62m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., Murphy, S., Ferrell, C., Goguts, N., Tsai, Y-H., Arrington, G.B., Boroski, J., Smith-Heimer, J., Golem, R., Peninger, P., Nakajima, E., Chui, E., Dunphy, R., Myers, M., & McKay, S. (2004). Transit-oriented development in the United States: Experiences, challenges, and prospects. TCRP Report 102. The National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23360/transit-oriented-development-in-the-united-states-experiences-challenges-and-prospects
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, T. S., Deyle, R. E., & Baker, E. J. (2008). A parcel-based GIS method for evaluating conformance of local land-use planning with a state mandate to reduce exposure to hurricane flooding. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, N. P. (2015). Factors affecting planned unit development implementation. Planning Practice & Research, 30(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1015832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, M. (2010). The persistent effects of Peru’s mining Mita. Econometrica, 78(6), 1863–1903. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., & Freeman, L. (2011). Planning for evaluation: Using regression discontinuity to evaluate targeted place-based programs. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11412784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyle, R. E., Chapin, T. S., & Baker, E. J. (2008). The proof of the planning is in the platting: An evaluation of Florida’s hurricane exposure mitigation planning mandate. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802229612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2002). Bringing power to planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(4), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbe, C. J. (2018). Why are regulations changed? A parcel analysis of upzoning in Los Angeles. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 38(3), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17696034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., & Ward, B. A. (2009). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from greater Boston. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra, E., Cervero, R., & Tischler, D. (2012). Half-mile circle: Does it best represent transit station catchments? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2276(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.3141/2276-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyadeen, D., & Seasons, M. (2016). Plan evaluation: Challenges and directions for future research. Planning Practice & Research, 31(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1081335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyadeen, D., & Seasons, M. (2018). Evaluation theory and practice: Comparing program evaluation and evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 38(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16675930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt, S. (2012). Mixed use by default: How the Europeans (don’t) zone. Journal of Planning Literature, 27(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412212451029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honey-Rosés, J., & Stevens, M. (2019). Commentary on the absence of experiments in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17739352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, L. D. (2001). Urban development: The logic of making plans. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, L. D. (2012). Plan assessment: Making and using plans well. In R. Weber & R. Crane (Eds.), Oxford handbook of urban planning (pp. 803–822). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibraeva, A., Correia, G. H., de, A., Silva, C., & Antunes, A. P. (2020). Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. (2016). Do land use regulations stifle residential development? Evidence from California cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 91, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlinsky, S. (2008, July). The long road home. The Urbanist. https://www.spur.org/publications/urbanist-article/2008-07-31/long-road-home
   Google Scholar
• Kaza, N., & Hopkins, L. (2009). In what circumstances should plans be public? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(4), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08330978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaap, G.-J., Hopkins, L. D., & Donaghy, K. P. (1998). Do plans matter? A game-theoretic model for examining the logic and effects of land use planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9801800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L., Warner, M. E., & Homsy, G. C. (2020). When do plans matter? Tracking changes in local government sustainability actions from 2010 to 2015. Journal of the American Planning Association, 86(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1667262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manville, M., & Osman, T. (2017). Motivations for growth revolts: Discretion and pretext as sources of development conflict. City & Community, 16(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastop, H., & Faludi, A. (1997). Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(6), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1068/b240815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, G. (2018). Sand castles before the tide? Affordable housing in expensive cities. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, A. (2012). Do city climate plans reduce emissions? Journal of Urban Economics, 71(3), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2011.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, A. (2013). The limits to planning. Causal impacts of city climate plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12449742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, A., & Kim, K. (2020). Mixed methods research. In R. Ewing, K. Park, & D. Proffitt (Eds.), Advanced quantitative research methods for urban planners (pp. 274–286). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, A., Weinberger, R. R., & Hampshire, R. C. (2013). Comment on Pierce and Shoup: Evaluating the impacts of performance-based parking. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(4), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.918481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monkkonen, P., Lens, M., & Manville, M. (2020). Built-out cities? How California cities restrict housing production through prohibition and process. Terner Center for Housing Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2010). Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412210364589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogodzinski, J. M., & Sass, T. R. (1994). The theory and estimation of endogenous zoning. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(5), 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(94)02059-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, J. M., & Raphael, S. (2005). Regulation and the high cost of housing in California. American Economic Review, 95(2), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, K. A., & Goetz, A. R. (2013). The reshaping of land use and urban form in Denver through transit-oriented development. Cities, 30, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. D., & Gao, S. (2019). Plan implementation challenges in a shrinking city: A conformance evaluation of Youngstown’s (OH) comprehensive plan with a subsequent zoning code. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(4), 424–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1637769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciara, G.-C. (2020). Measuring land use performance: From policy to plan to outcome. In E. Deakin (Ed.), Transportation, land use, and environmental planning (pp. 105–129). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815167-9.00006-2
   Google Scholar
• Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections. (2009). Rezones: Process and application requirements. http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/publications/cam/cam228.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seattle’s Land Use Code. (2011, June 18). Just not my type: Type IV and V rezones. https://seattleslandusecode.wordpress.com/2011/06/18/just-not-my-type-type-iv-and-v-rezones/
   Google Scholar
• Selmi, D. P. (2011). The contract transformation in land use regulation. Stanford Law Review, 63(3), 591–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1996a). After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9601600201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1996b). Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 10(3), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229601000302
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied Social Research Methods series, Vol. 46. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, M. (2016). TAMS: Text Analysis Markup System: An open source qualitative analysis system [Computer software]. http://tamsys.sourceforge.net/
   Google Scholar
• Winship, C., & Morgan, S. L. (1999). The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 659–706. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar