“Ambiguous, Confusing, and Not Delivering Enough Housing”

References

• Adams, D., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Planners as market actors: Rethinking state–market relations in land and property. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649351003759631
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2019). Housing affordability. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-welfare/housing-affordability
   Google Scholar
• Biggar, J. (2017). Between public goals and private projects: Negotiating community benefits for density from Toronto’s urban redevelopment [PhD thesis]. University of Toronto. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/80665
   Google Scholar
• Brunick, N., Goldberg, L., Levine, S. (2004). Voluntary or mandatory inclusionary housing? Production, predictability, and enforcement. Business and Professional People for the Public Interest. http://bpichicago.org/documents/mandatoryv.voluntary5.06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• California Coalition for Rural Housing & Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California. (2003). Inclusionary housing in California: 30 years of innovation. http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/NPH-IHinCAfor30years2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Ellis, H., Henneberry, J., & Gladwell, C. (2000). Planning obligations, planning practice, and land-use outcomes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(5), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catney, P., & Henneberry, J. (2012). (Not) exercising discretion: Environmental planning and the politics of blame-avoidance. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(4), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.728002
   Google Scholar
• City of Port Phillip. (2020). Planning committee: City of Port Philip [Planning Committee Minutes]. https://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/media/dkelk3is/report-6-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Community Housing Industry Association. (2020). Affordable housing agreements: Understanding the community housing sector fact sheet. Municipal Association of Victoria. http://www.mav.asn.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/24803/Affordable_Housing_Fact_Sheet_Developers_PRINT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crook, A. D. H., & Whitehead, C. M. E. (2002). Social housing and planning gain: Is this an appropriate way of providing affordable housing? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34(7), 1259–1279. https://doi.org/10.1068/a34135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook, T., Henneberry, J., & Whitehead, C. M. E. (2016). Introduction. In T. Crook, J. Henneberry, & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Planning gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing (p. 1). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, G., Legacy, C., Liu, E., & Darcy, M. (2016). The factors driving the escalation of community opposition to affordable housing development. Urban Policy and Research, 34(4), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2015.1118377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. (2020). Planning permit activity monthly report. Reporting. https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/resource-library/planning-permit-activity-in-victoria/planning-permit-activity-monthly-report
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, R., Ferrari, E., & Watkins, C. (2016). Spatial variation in the incidence and value of planning obligations. In T. Crook, J. Henneberry, & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Planning gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, R., Lord, A., Keskin, B., & Buck, M. (2019). Is there a relationship between planning culture and the value of planning gain? Evidence from England. Town Planning Review, 90(4), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2019.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferm, J., & Raco, M. (2020). Viability planning, value capture and the geographies of market-led planning reform in England. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1754446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. L. (1981). Getting to YES: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2015). From brown envelopes to community benefits: The co-option of planning gain agreements under deepening neoliberalism. Geoforum, 67, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L., & Schuetz, J. (2017). Producing affordable housing in rising markets: What works? Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 19(1), 217–236. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscpe/vol19num1/article11.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garde, A. (2016). Affordable by design? Inclusionary housing insights from Southern California. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15600033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., Gilbert, C., Gibb, K., van den Nouwelant, R., James, A., & Phibbs, P. (2018). Supporting affordable housing supply: Inclusionary planning in new and renewing communities (AHURI Final Report, 297). Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.18408/ahuri-7313201
   Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., & Whitehead, C. (2011). Planning and affordable housing in Australia and the UK: A comparative perspective. Housing Studies, 26(7–8), 1193–1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2011.618982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, Z. (2018). Giving back to get ahead: Altruism as a developer strategy of accumulation through affordable housing policy in Toronto and Vancouver. Geoforum. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2020). Negotiation or schedule-based? Examining the strengths and weaknesses of the public benefit exaction strategies of Boston and Seattle. Journal of the American Planning Association, 86(2), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1691040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). Interests: The measure of negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 2(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1986.tb00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A., Burgess, G., Gu, Y., & Dunning, R. (2019). Virtuous or vicious circles? Exploring the behavioural connections between developer contributions and path dependence: Evidence from England. Geoforum, 106, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah, J., & Hackworth, J. (2011). Local politics and inclusionary housing in three large Canadian cities. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 20(1), 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Malpass, P. (2008). Housing and the new welfare state: Wobbly pillar or cornerstone? Housing Studies, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030701731100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, P., Street, E., & Wyatt, P. (2016). Governing calculative practices: An investigation of development viability modelling in the English planning system. Urban Studies, 53(11), 2363–2379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015589722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkel-Meadow, C. (2009). Chronicling the complexification of negotiation theory and practice. Negotiation Journal, 25(4), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mnookin, R. (2003). When not to negotiate: A negotiation imperialist reflects on appropriate limits. University of Colorado Law Review, 74, 1077–1107.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, S., & Crook, T. (2016). International experience. In T. Crook, J. Henneberry, & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Planning Gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing (pp. 227–268). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, N., & Burgess, G. (2014). Inclusionary housing policy in England: The impact of the downturn on the delivery of affordable housing through Section 106. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(3), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-013-9360-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhija, V., Das, A., Regus, L., & Tsay, S. S. (2015). The tradeoffs of inclusionary zoning: What do we know and what do we need to know? Planning Practice & Research, 30(2), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1008793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhija, V., Regus, L., Slovin, S., & Das, A. (2010). Can inclusionary zoning be an effective and efficient housing policy? Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange counties. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtoaro, J., & Kujala, J. (2007). Project negotiation analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 25(7), 722–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2009). Mutually dependent: Power, trust, affect and the use of deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9774-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning and Environment Act (Victoria, Australia). (1987). https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/in-force/acts/planning-and-environment-act-1987/146
   Google Scholar
• Porter, D., & Davison, E. (2009). Evaluation of in-lieu fees and offsite construction as incentives for affordable housing production. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 11(2), 27–59. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscpe/vol11num2/ch2.html
   Google Scholar
• Provis, C. (1996). Interests vs. positions: A critique of the distinction. Negotiation Journal, 12(4), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynor, K., & Whitzman, C. (2021). How intersectoral policy networks shape affordable housing outcomes. International Journal of Housing Policy, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2019.1697150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, G. (2017). Toronto’s condo-builders: Development approaches and spatial preferences. Urban Geography, 38(4), 606–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1179426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. J. (2010). Developer typologies in urban renewal in Sydney: Recognising the role of informal associations between developers and local government. Urban Policy and Research, 28(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140903356403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2010). Role conflict: Planners torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities. In J. Hillier & P. Healey (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to planning theory. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2009). 31 flavors of inclusionary zoning: Comparing policies from San Francisco, Washington, DC, and suburban Boston. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360903146806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2011). Silver bullet or Trojan horse? The effects of inclusionary zoning on local housing markets in the United States. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 48(2), 297–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009360683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclar, E., Baird-Zars, B., Ames Fischer, L., & Stahl, V. (Eds.). (2020). Zoning: A guide for 21st-century planning. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Shmueli, D. F., Kaufman, S., & Ozawa, C. (2008). Mining negotiation theory for planning insights. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(3), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X07311074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind, L. E. (1987). Negotiating better development agreements. Negotiation Journal, 3(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1987.tb00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaden, E., & Wang, R. (2017). Inclusionary housing in the United States: Prevalence, impact, and practices. Lincoln Institute. http://www.lincolninst.edu/sites/default/files/pubfiles/thaden_wp17et1_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wetzstein, S. (2017). The global urban housing affordability crisis. Urban Studies, 54(14), 3159–3177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017711649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, C. M. E. (2007). Planning policies and affordable housing: England as a successful case study? Housing Studies, 22(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030601024580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf-Powers, L. (2013). Teaching planners to deal: The pedagogical value of a (simulated) economic development negotiation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(3), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13482979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar